Than go to Africa or China. And let's see if you white and male "privilege" will help you there. Heck - go and try to live a day in your own country without your home, money, or ID, like lots of other white homless people do. Join Yellow Jackets, to become even a little bit useful.

So, you're telling me that in Russia, it's worse to be a white male than to be black girl ? It's worse to be a white heterosexual than a muslim gay ? I'm quite sure it's not the case.

Oh, no, you're just saying that white men of 1940-1945 where so much racists and/or anti-communists that they even killed and/or raped white people (but not as "white" as they were, not as capitalist as they were).
So you've just proven my point again.

Well, I must also admit (without a second of doubt) that it's not really better today, not in term of mass killing of course (although I'm quite sure that capitalism will kill a lot more of people in the next decades than nazis+soviets+maoists, you have a lot of references, some in english here : https://blogs.mediapart.fr/jean-marc-b/blog/261217/victimes-du-capitalisme-un-devoir-de-memoire, of how much capitalism is already killing people. And no, I don't think a worldwide "communism" as seen in Russia or China would be better, I just think there are lots of other economics systems that would do better than any of those two)

Thanks again a lot.

Please, do continue.
Well, as I said earlier, it will be much more easy for me in Africa or China to be a white male hetero than to be :
- a white male homo
- a white female homo/hetero
- a black male homo
- a black female homo/hetero. And if you are JUST a bit intellectually honest, it will be easier for a white male without a home, money, or ID in my country than for a black/female without home, money or ID.

Again, thanks for proving I'm right!

I don't think it matters who would have it easier when they have no home, money or ID; anybody in that situation is having a bad time of it regardless of race or gender.

Also I don't see that it's useful to discuss who has more or less racism against them, the fact is nobody, no matter what race, should have racism directed at them.

No, it won't. Also, you left out black male hetero. And didn't evn mentioned Asians. Why?

I AM intellectually honest. It's you, who doesn't know (or doesn't want to know) about dozens of organizations that help homless non-white people, illegal migrants especially. White people are left on their own.
No, he is saying that even the blackes gayest muslim transgender or whatever group you think is most oppressed in Europe today, doesn't know half of hardship Russians endured (and continue to endure in some cases).

Also, did you just implied that muslims aren't white?

It's always hard to judge how harder (and to put a one-dimensional figure for it) it is for one or another when in such situation, but If you can read french:

http://www.ch-le-vinatier.fr/orspere-samdarra/rhizome/anciens-numeros/rhizome-n11-la-souffrance-est-elle-sexuee/etre-une-femme-sdf-est-ce-different-1639.html

https://www.francetvinfo.fr/societe/droits-des-femmes/j-ai-ete-violee-70-fois-en-17-ans-de-rue-le-grand-tabou-des-agressions-sexuelles-sur-les-femmes-sdf_2345935.html

Not at all. I'm only telling you that you do not know a shit about hardship.

Sorry - but this sentence (but not as "white" as they were, not as capitalist as they were) is stupid. You obviously misplaced one of "not" words.

Just for your information - there was NO communism in Russia. There was SOCIALISM.

I mean, I just said I don't care who has it worse off than someone else in any particular situation, when that situation is going to be bad for anyone. A homeless black man or a white man, both are in the same terrible situation. Conversely, a situation where someone is a millionaire is good, whether you're a black man or a white man. Race is irrelevant to how bad or good the situation is. It's a strange hobby these days, so many people seem obsessed with which arbitrary group is worse off than some other arbitrary group, when what matters are the individuals and their character.

There is nothing strange at all. Racism, sexism and many other different kind of prejudice were always flourishing among ignorant and stupid people. After all it's the most easy way to put a blame on one single group of people (regardes if they are black or white, or have whatever distinct characteristics) for everything wrong in the world.

Honestly, most annoying thing with people like francksteel is that they don't even try to dig the information. To look into different sources, check all sides of each story. And it's today, with every possible (well, almost every possible) document in the Internet being at their fingertips.

It's true economic class is kind of equal but I don't think you're even contemplating how your race or gender also influences how people treat you. People ridicule others all the time for their skin color, we've been through wars about this.

People struggle all the time whether it be from personal, economic, or racial struggles. It's about trying to decrease as much as we can.

Please take your own advice, you are completely ignoring the struggles of different people and almost being apathetic to people who actually want to talk about it. It's not "SJW propaganda" to look into these topics, it's an integral part of society. You need to stop acting ignorant and realize that instead of ignoring it like it doesn't exist.

Actually, I did. I've pulled quite a few sources to learn about black people history, history of women in power and also history of attitude towards sex and sexuality. And I didn't restrict myself to just one side. Can you say the same thing about yourself?

You're right, I don't bother contemplating it. I don't expect or need anything from anyone else. I don't find it useful to get into victim olympics to find out who is most hard done by, it encourages people to play victim instead of using what they've got and learning to be better.

What do you mean by "other side"? There is only one side when it comes to historical truth. If you know about class struggles then you know it's an issue worth talking about in the game.

It's about holding people of power accountable you can't better yourself when outside forces take you down. Not everyone's struggles are just personal. You must fight for you and others freedom.

Oh, really? Then, as someone from US, tell me did Bernie Sanders said that woman can't win presidential elections? Or was Elizabeth Warren lying? What is "historical truth" of this event?

We already have freedom.

Unless there's actual oppression going on, like say the government is locking up an ethnic group, there's no outside force trying to take you down, that's being overly dramatic. If all you're talking about is that, as a made up example, people in a society think that asian people are too arrogant. Those people are free to think what they like, and the asian people they're referencing are free to be or not be arrogant, or think whatever they like about anyone else as well; as long as they're not infringing on someone else's rights. That's what freedom looks like. If you try to stop people from thinking what they want, you're trying to implement the opposite of freedom.

It's already illegal to discriminate in jobs, unless there's actual discrimination happening you're just making problems up. It's silly, like that 'air conditioning is sexist' article I saw awhile back. You're tilting at windmills and pretending to be fighting some noble fight while doing it.

What are you talking about? What does a political debate have anything to do with history? If there is evidence that it happens then it's true. I still dont understand what you mean by "the other side"