It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Rape? In a game? Those are not real people.

For real people there could be laws, i just dunno what it got to do with gamers and adult content.

avatar
marcob: That's unintuitively one reason not to ban those things heavily or entirely: they give additional value to the product, they make it rare and prized while it often is not worth such reputation.

I noticed that even the most trivial non free adult game is typically at the same price as big name sagas with much more meat to them! Ten euros for a whole collection of arcade classics, two indie gems at day one or a graphics-heavy strategy with basic campaigns; fifteen or twenty euros for a visual novel with on-screen written dialogues and mostly static pictures...(!)
Games, and everything, got the price "worth it to them". If a price is to high it simply will not sell sufficiently, with all of its effects. There are many factors playing a role, scarcity is one of them; although adult games are not per se rare, ONLY the good ones... those are really very rare.

Often i see a 10 hours, non adult games, going for 20 or even 30 coins, especially metroidvania games with a high popularity and some other games can offer several times this playtime for lesser money. It got nothing to do with "how much is inside"... rather if those buying it are sufficiently valuing it which can happen to any game for different reasons.

avatar
marcob: Shimoneta was right? I'm baffled. Weren't left-wing feminists about sexual freedom? Did it go so far that went full circle back?!?
THEIR sexual freedom, not the freedom of others.
Post edited July 25, 2025 by Xeshra
avatar
HeavilyAugmented: In other news, itch.io just shadowbanned adult tagged media hosted on their store, deleted some titles, and allegedly, even if you bought them prior, they can't be downloaded anymore. If a digital store smaller than GOG is getting hit with this as well, expect a reaction from GOG too very soon.
avatar
Cavalary: No kidding. As I was saying, so far if you sorted by top selling, you got pages and pages on which all but a few titles, count-on-your-fingers sort of thing, were definitely X-rated. Now do the same thing and they're all gone.
... Which makes me wonder how will itch stay afloat, if they banned what quite clearly made a majority of their income.
So far they just deindexed these games WHILE sorting them manually. Those games they deindexed also still can be downloaded (at least those I tested). However they went from approx. 17000 games tagged "adult" to 47(!). So there is a whole lot of games that MIGHT get affected. IN opposite to what has claimed I personally am not aware that they actually reved games from those they have deindexed. Do we have examples (other than No Mercy which they removed months ago because of the screaming lunatics)?.
avatar
Xeshra: Games, and everything, got the price "worth it to them". If a price is to high it simply will not sell sufficiently, with all of its effects. There are many factors playing a role, scarcity is one of them; although adult games are not per se rare, ONLY the good ones... those are really very rare.
That's like this ideally. But market self-regulation to the best outcome for the customer is quite a wishful thought. It does it slowly, badly and partially.
Sometimes things stay overpriced or, more rarely, underpriced, for external and debatable reasons and "wallet karma" do not really reach. Sometimes it's just out of stubborness and the seller is likely to be hurt as well in the mid-long term, but still doesn't change their tag!

I mean "rare" in a specific sense (not quantity wise: we're drowned in it since it's easy to make mediocre tit-pics and hope to float along a bit of - mild- shock value to make up for the so-so content). I mean less convenient to obtain, actually. It gives it (undue) immaterial value that typically transaltes in a price addition.

THEIR sexual freedom, not the freedom of others.
Oh, come on. Seems to be talking to one of them, genders swapped.
It was never "them" and "the others", a right for some and not for all is not a right to begin with and it's gonna undo itself(unless the difference of possibilities is soundly grounded in different situations, of course). They should know, as well as you: it was the movement's strong point, one that was widely agreed upon back into the previous generation, before all communication (in a majority of topics, not just this one) turned into a big exercise in self-centering.
Post edited July 25, 2025 by marcob
avatar
Paratech2008: So will they go to GOG and make demands, and what games will be forced to be removed?
avatar
Work_Account_1: Not enough cats. Hoping more will switch to drm free gaming after this but my cynicism says otheriwse.
GOG rejected "Stars in the Trash" which in fact could be called a hand drawn and animated cat simulator.
https://www.gog.com/dreamlist/game/stars-in-the-trash-2024
avatar
Xeshra: Rape? In a game? Those are not real people.

For real people there could be laws, i just dunno what it got to do with gamers and adult content.
avatar
marcob: Nope, not in a game. They would be drawings if so. That's the point. Levels are and have always been almost three:
a real action, its representation (or a depiction of fictional events mixing a substantial part of real people and/or elements in it) and a representation of a more or less believable imagined action involving equally imagined "people" (quotes, very big quotes).
It works for most topics actually. Giving each level flatly the same meaning and weight is distortion. That's why I came out with that. That would be the "level 1" counterpart to the most controversial games (that, however, happens at level 3, giant difference).

What pisses me off is your bitter grudge against women (in this worlds, as they're treated in this world) seems not fictional as well..
I definitely got no grudge because this matter is very individual and is able to affect any entity; toward women rather in some broader cases hate-love or love-hate, because i am prone to love them as my natural destiny, despite many issues and differences that may come out, and with, it. So, it can be a struggle but a struggle i love to take, because it is worth it to me. Anyway, this is purely personal and not bound to the "adult game matter" affecting the gamers in general, beyond my personal world.

In general any group, be it women, men or something in between including non binary, got a lot of bad treatment in this world and it is as well very dependable on the personal circumstances and location. The struggle or bad treatment may differ in many aspects but everyone can potentially be affected by it. I feel it is important to look from every angle toward this matter, never become stuck on a fixed point of view.

What i want to know more specific is, how you draw "your line"... perhaps those levels in order to decide "what is as a purely artistic expression acceptable" and where is the point... the level, where it becomes not acceptable anymore. What is actually the core matter, the expression and act itself, lack of expressed or clearly visible consent or everything at once?

avatar
Xeshra: THEIR sexual freedom, not the freedom of others.
avatar
marcob: Oh, come on. Seems to be talking to one of them, genders swapped.
It was never "them" and "the others", a right for some and not for all is not a right to begin with and it's gonna undo itself(unless the difference of possibilities is soundly grounded in different situations, of course). They should know, as well as you: it was the movement's strong point, one that was widely agreed upon back into the previous generation, before all communication (in a majority of topics, not just this one) turned into a big exercise in self-centering.
Well, if there are so many issues world wide related to this matter, did everyone fully agree on those terms or was it rather a thing certain groups was demanding? If not, guess everyone will have to sit down together in plenum and check it out why those rights are not going as smooth as planned. As well rights are not granted, they are given... and in usual if some groups are asking for certain rights they may have to give something back in exchange, some other rights. It may not work very well if most of the rights being asked for are actually rather one sided. Although, in a patriarchy men usually are the ones able to attribute more rights to them and in a matriarchy it is obviously reverse order. I do consider it perfect if there is some sort of... rather rarely seen, balance.

We would not even discus this matter if not... it is not even being "moved" into adult games with certain demands and effects.
Post edited July 25, 2025 by Xeshra
avatar
Kaliesto: Is it really actually justice to let certain types of people just get lost in such things like being attracted to your cousin and need video games around this subject just to stop the intrusive thoughts? Aren't the developers in a way victimizing them further, and continuing their taboo urges and profiting off their own disgust and misery?
That statement is wrong on two levels:
1) You are assuming that people who play these games do have the actual urge to do these things in reality.
2) If the very few people who actually do have the urges to act out on them in reality would not have these games, dolls or whatever - they would act out on them in reality. Not having these alternatives would not stop the urges.

However - the devs are not aiming at the very few disturbed people, they aim for the majority of them who is pretty normal. Just read some forum threads in f95zone which is one of the biggest adult gaming forums. Even those who enjoy playing rape and domination games are extremely normal. Some even played them while their partners were with them ... they know that they are playing a game.

avatar
Kaliesto: Reminder to everyone that people are attracted to taboo things are likely victims of abuse in most cases (but not all), and I don't think its right when developers glorify certain fantasies that it furthers that mental abuse. (these people were not born this way, they were molded into this by a abuser).
That's wrong as well. Tha majority of people attracted to taboo things IN GAMES are just curious. There are some victims of rape and/or abuse who do use these games to regain control - to cope with the traume - and they do help. You can find those comments in the mentioned forum as well. The majority however was not a victim to anything.

avatar
Kaliesto: If we had any empathy for these people then other people need to reach out to them, and see if they need actual help rather than trying to cleanse their urges through these taboo games which might as well be taking hard drugs just to stave off the intrusive thoughts.
Video games is literally not the answer to their own problems, seeking help from others if gamers cared enough about this subject should be the solution.
Speaking about those very few who actually are using these games to cope they don't only use these games they also have psychologic guidance. Nobody is forcing anyone to play any game ... even if they exist - it's still a CHOICE to buy and/or play them.

avatar
Kaliesto: Though lately through recent developments, I see now they been taking down adult games that had nothing to do with those subjects and now its being a oppressive atmosphere for everyone. I was afraid this was gonna happen, and now we're all paying the price for it and could affect run of the mill games like The Witcher.
The adult games are not at fault ... you are blaming the wrong things here. You are paying the price for some peopel thinking that they could dictate the world what's right and what's wrong and the payment processors hyaving too much power and doing their will. That is the problem. Adult content is just a scapegoat.
avatar
Cavalary: No kidding. As I was saying, so far if you sorted by top selling, you got pages and pages on which all but a few titles, count-on-your-fingers sort of thing, were definitely X-rated. Now do the same thing and they're all gone.
... Which makes me wonder how will itch stay afloat, if they banned what quite clearly made a majority of their income.
avatar
MarkoH01: So far they just deindexed these games WHILE sorting them manually. Those games they deindexed also still can be downloaded (at least those I tested). However they went from approx. 17000 games tagged "adult" to 47(!). So there is a whole lot of games that MIGHT get affected. IN opposite to what has claimed I personally am not aware that they actually reved games from those they have deindexed. Do we have examples (other than No Mercy which they removed months ago because of the screaming lunatics)?.
So they said that less games are considered adult, thus *actually reducing* censorship warnings? Plus hoping to discourage them (on the surface) by not showing they have it (so offering them "cover", or at most creating some inconvenience that some aficionados can easily go round by manually doing a list of links (giving them a fake "forbidden" allure in the process)..

Is this "No Mercy" gonna be the new "Rule of rose", that is something that would never rise to fame if someone would not call it out in disgust. Are they actually Barbara-Straisanding the titles that are most controversial (and possibly in bad taste)? That's definitely another way to circle back to the opposite outcome..! And older producers, especially in television know it so well. They thrived on it in the nineties ("Parental advisory, explicit lyrics" and then edgy teens flock to get a CD that would likely be ignored without the -advertising- warning label)
Post edited July 25, 2025 by marcob
The fall of itch.io is indeed worrying, I really can't see GOG making a stand and if anyone was interested in seeing the rest of the Rance series here... yeah, you can kiss that goodbye

Best case scenario, the unrated patches get hidden and the games with explicit cotent shadowbanned
avatar
marcob: So they said that less games are considered adult, thus *actually reducing* censorship warnings? Plus hoping to discourage them (on the surface) by not showing they have it (so offering them "cover", or at most creating some inconvenience that some aficionados can easily go round by manually doing a list of links (giving them a fake "forbidden" allure in the process)..
No, they just deindexed them so that they have time to check them manually to find out if they could be considered to be okay according to the rulesof their payment processors or not. It is a temporary and ongoing thing. We still have to wait to see how many games will actually be removed in the end. However in opposite to GOG and Steam on itch it would mean that the download links for those who bought the games before will be gone as well.

avatar
marcob: Is this "No Mercy" gonna be the new "Rule of rose", that is something that would never rise to fame if someone would not call it out in disgust. Are they actually Barbara-Straisanding the titles that are most controversial (and possibly in bad taste)? That's definitely another way to circle back to the opposite outcome..! And older producers, especially in television know it so well. They thrived on it in the nineties ("Parental advisory, explicit lyrics" and then edgy teens flock to get a CD that would likely be ignored without the -advertising- warning label)
That's actually exactly what happened with this game. There are far more extreme games out there but the collective shout group was informed about this one and started to aim at it. They attacked it on Steam - and the dev who did not want to fight or harm Steam decided to remove it. The only way to get it was itch.io and a few days later it was removed there without any announcement (download links and even discussion links also removed). Now they retracted even further to subscribestar which is not as well known as Patreon but you could call it very niche ... and now it has been shadowbanned there as well. It is a manhunt - nothing more. This group won't just say "okay, if it is only accessible to adults we are fine" they also won't say "oh, if it is only on this store it is fine" - they simply want those games to be eradicated completely. Modern book burning. They affect not just gamers but also the devs creating these games to pay their bills ... and who believe it or not ... also often have families.REAL people.
Post edited July 25, 2025 by MarkoH01
@Marko

You made some few interesting points I didn't think about, but have to agree to disagree on a few other things just mainly how I feel about those types of games in general, and we'll leave it at that. At the end of the day I got too caught up in this, and I'll just going to leave everything be.

Also I found out something about that Collective Shout group I think everyone should know about and you all can just google it. People dug out some old dirt and turns out they harbored and promoted some rather disgusting and disturbing things in the past that was largely almost forgotten about until the internet reminded everyone.
Post edited July 25, 2025 by Kaliesto
avatar
Kaliesto: @Marko

You made some few interesting points I didn't think about, but have to agree to disagree on a few other things just mainly how I feel about those types of games in general, and we'll leave it at that. At the end of the day I got too caught up in this, and I'll just going to leave everything be.

Also I found out something about that Collective Shout group I think everyone should know about and you all can just google it. People dug out some old dirt and turns out they harbored and promoted some rather disgusting and disturbing things in the past that was largely almost forgotten about until the internet reminded everyone.
Honestly most groups that behave even remotely like Collective Shout has such things they have done if not worse like they are trying to seem extremely good as a result when it cases the opposite affect making them worse with how ''try hard'' they go and usually whatever a group goes after is related to the thing they had done or had helped a being get away with or otherwise
On topic of censorship, the Online Safety Act and the Digital Services Act have just hit, making a ton of sites start requiring users from Europe to perform age verification to access (as in, scan your face, submit ID or get out). Social media also started geo-blocking posts until you do the same thing. Seen reports from X and Discord.

Smaller sites and forums with no funds to ensure such functionality are of course forced to cease operation in Europe.

What the hell is happening this July? Everybody going batshit insane wasn't on my bingo card for this year.
avatar
Kaliesto: You made some few interesting points I didn't think about, but have to agree to disagree on a few other things just mainly how I feel about those types of games in general, and we'll leave it at that. At the end of the day I got too caught up in this, and I'll just going to leave everything be.
Just one last thing.
If you personally dislike those games and feel bad about them I can't change this and tbh I don't even want to. Everybody should be and feel as they want - that's my idea of freedom. I just wanted to inform you - with no intention of changing your personal opinion about these games - that these games don't hurt anyone.

avatar
Kaliesto: Also I found out something about that Collective Shout group I think everyone should know about and you all can just google it. People dug out some old dirt and turns out they harbored and promoted some rather disgusting and disturbing things in the past that was largely almost forgotten about until the internet reminded everyone.
Yes, they are not really the most honest people ...
Post edited July 26, 2025 by MarkoH01
So was doing research on why other thensome out of teach higher ups in payment processors why they often bend to the demands of people and threaten to cut ties ... its because the fact happened around 2018 or so where companies even payment processors that can't keep tract of what people buy can get sued and has lost for how the legal systems of pretty much every country has deemed it where not just the one putting content of specific kinds are at fault .. but also the site itself and the people who buy said things .. or pay for the service that allows access to such even if the user never knew about it nor touched it and same for the payment processors or the site owners and staff..

Its basically a issue that goes back to how laws are written that needs properly updated or specific laws put back in place and better written

so ya every company in fact is bending to the whims of these people more so out of fear do to iether outdated laws or laws getting revoked that shouldn't have been revoked or people finding ways to bypass the laws via technicality's allowing loopholes . Which judges even are willing to piont out to people at times these loopholes and basically say''go for it''

edit as I suck at explaining things , a good run down of this is this vid I found just before my message https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmHHnPLllUk
Post edited July 26, 2025 by BanditKeith2
avatar
sqjzwpsr: Maybe in the US of A - in Europe it's likely more of a 50 50 or even a 40 60 ratio with alternative payment methods like PayPal being able to assert themselves.
avatar
Foxhack: PAYPAL is extremely anti porn. If they even get a whiff of your account being used to buy or pay for it, boom, it's gone, and with it any money you might have in it.

Fucking puritanical bullshit.
That's rich coming from Paypal conisdering the tribe that created the porn industry in the first place owns Paypal.