It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Oh, a puzzle giveaway! Can't resist a puzzle...
I am a bit late for the fun, but thanks to the discussion of clues up until now I have a bit of a headstart, I guess :)
So, let's see if I can puzzle this out...

And Kudos to grimwerk, of course, for the lovely giveaway!
avatar
Graerth: Didn't actually know that codes were limited to A-F, so that did give some options to do with my answers.
Still doesn't make it logical to me so I will probably not solve the code.
avatar
mrkgnao: The old 16-letter codes carried all letters; the new 20-letter codes are simply hexadecimal (hence, 1-9, A-F; I have never seen a zero).
I didn't know that either. With that knowledge maybe I'll take another crack.

Thanks!
avatar
huN73R: It looks like relationship can be seen if you've got all right answers.
I have all the right answers (confirmed) but still haven't puzzled out the relationship. Knowing now the keys are hexidecimal might help.

But I still haven't puzzled out why the difference between 'exposition' and 'exhibition' is relevant, so I'm guessing it may still elude me.
Post edited March 31, 2015 by bler144
Yeah! I figured it out... Oh, that sweet sweet feeling of a puzzle being solved :)
That was quite a brain teaser! In hindsight, the solution seems so simple, but actually getting there...

I haven't redeemed the game, mind you, I feel kind of bad sneeking in "through the backdoor" and snatching the price...

avatar
bler144: I do see some possible similarities in answers - an answer that starts with 'ver' and another with 'vir' and 8 & 15 are very close. But still not sure what to do with that info or if it's even relevant.
avatar
mrkgnao: It is very relevant.

avatar
bler144: 16 & 20 have a lot of letters in common.
avatar
mrkgnao: Also very relevant.
Actually, those hints (while I'm sure they were well intentioned) totally sent me on a wild goose chase... So, if anyone is still having a go at this puzzle, do not start comparing words back and forth, it will get you absolutely nowhere ;)
Post edited April 01, 2015 by WildHobgoblin
avatar
WildHobgoblin: Yeah! I figured it out... Oh, that sweet sweet feeling of a puzzle being solved :)
That was quite a brain teaser! In hindsight, the solution seems so simple, but actually getting there...
Well done, Hobgoblin!

That was quite quick.

It seems the puzzle is still up in the air!
I can't figure out some of them! :-(

The only NATO codes I can discover are the phonetic alphabet and the flags.

Also, "if not p then not q", as far as I know, is the same as "if q then p". In English, the name I found was "Transposition", which has too many letters.

Any more tips?
avatar
Gede: The only NATO codes I can discover are the phonetic alphabet and the flags.
Exactly!

avatar
Gede: Also, "if not p then not q", as far as I know, is the same as "if q then p". In English, the name I found was "Transposition", which has too many letters.
If p then q is the default expression when learning [propositional] logic. (Well, for me, in 1980something!)
If not p then not q is the _______ of that expression.
avatar
Gede: I can't figure out some of them! :-(

The only NATO codes I can discover are the phonetic alphabet and the flags.

Also, "if not p then not q", as far as I know, is the same as "if q then p". In English, the name I found was "Transposition", which has too many letters.

Any more tips?
If you wish, you can solve both by googling grimwerk's clues exactly as is and looking through the first few results.
avatar
mrkgnao: If you wish, you can solve both by googling grimwerk's clues exactly as is and looking through the first few results.
haha
Maybe all my clues!
And it may be that google autocomplete handles most of them.

My next puzzle will be somewhat google-resistant.

edit:
Although, google results vary by user history and region. So maybe I'm wrong.
Post edited April 01, 2015 by grimwerk
avatar
mrkgnao: If you wish, you can solve both by googling grimwerk's clues exactly as is and looking through the first few results.
avatar
grimwerk: haha
Maybe all my clues!
And it may be that google autocomplete handles most of them.
Well, I'm not sure I could have figured out the Speed Stick thing by myself...
As for the other clues, I think google is definitely a good friend there :)
avatar
WildHobgoblin: Well, I'm not sure I could have figured out the Speed Stick thing by myself...
As for the other clues, I think google is definitely a good friend there :)
That Speed Stick nonsense was a brief (and probably offensive) internet phenomenon. I was expecting those unfamiliar to fall back on google, so I hope it works everywhere. Still, in our home, "It's not expensive." is code for "You should probably take a shower." So everyone is obliged to endure my stupid clue.
avatar
WildHobgoblin: Well, I'm not sure I could have figured out the Speed Stick thing by myself...
As for the other clues, I think google is definitely a good friend there :)
avatar
grimwerk: That Speed Stick nonsense was a brief (and probably offensive) internet phenomenon. I was expecting those unfamiliar to fall back on google, so I hope it works everywhere. Still, in our home, "It's not expensive." is code for "You should probably take a shower." So everyone is obliged to endure my stupid clue.
I had to google that one. Most Speed-Stick is anti-perspirant, so at first I thought the answer you were pointing to was "deodorant" which fit the letter count.

Though the more I thought about it, while not all deodorants are anti-perspirants, anti-perspirants generally also are deodorants. And speed-stick sells both in any case ;)
Curious if the first element of the code is a 'B'
avatar
bler144: Curious if the first element of the code is a 'B'
I'm afraid not.
avatar
bler144: Curious if the first element of the code is a 'B'
avatar
mrkgnao: I'm afraid not.
Back to square one then. ;)

I'd tried summing the letters of each word (a=1, etc.) then taking the remainder dividing by 16 and converting the result to hexadecimal.
avatar
mrkgnao: I'm afraid not.
avatar
bler144: Back to square one then. ;)

I'd tried summing the letters of each word (a=1, etc.) then taking the remainder dividing by 16 and converting the result to hexadecimal.
It's a lot simpler than that. Don't give up.