Posted December 11, 2014
dedoporno: I'm not entirely sure that I understand you question. I'm pretty sure that if some of the winners are scum they will talk about their actions in a post factum manner. Like they did something and they achieved whatever result. This may or may not be true, though (most likely the latter, especially if the ability is something that is worth keeping for mid to end game). It's quite probable that they didn't really use their action that night or in the way they said, or the action was used but the effect was entirely different, etc. These unknowns are why I believe everything that comes from the winners as a result from their supposed actions should be analyzed and put to question rather than taken at face value. Again, I'm not sure I understood you properly and if this answer satisfies your question.
HypersomniacLive: It does, thank you. What are your thoughts about RWarehall eagerness to answer all questions that were asked about the prizes? He's also the only one to talk about his prize in more details.
This is actually a question for all, so whoever wants to chime in, please do.
Still, it is to be expected to see someone per game play like that. Mrkgnao had a way of gaining credo points early on. Gonna advise you from now, when you play with him, never believe a damn thing 100%, no matter what others say. He knows how to sugar coat things better than anyone I've seen, and I've been places.