It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Barefoot_Monkey: and this one
avatar
Shambhala: Is it supposed to show blank pages in case you own all games from that page or should it group the non owned games on the first pages?

I don't know if I made sense, but when I browse the games I see the first page with one single game, the second with three of them and so one so forth.
What you see is the normal behaviour. Barefoot cannot move games from page to page, he just hides the owned ones in the GOG-generated page. You can easily end up with an entirely empty page.
I noticed today the colorfull logo of GOG in the upper left corner and I'm really happy!
avatar
Shambhala: Is it supposed to show blank pages in case you own all games from that page or should it group the non owned games on the first pages?

I don't know if I made sense, but when I browse the games I see the first page with one single game, the second with three of them and so one so forth.
avatar
mrkgnao: What you see is the normal behaviour. Barefoot cannot move games from page to page, he just hides the owned ones in the GOG-generated page. You can easily end up with an entirely empty page.
Ok thanks, it is still really usefull when you own a good chunk of the catalog.
avatar
mrkgnao: What you see is the normal behaviour. Barefoot cannot move games from page to page, he just hides the owned ones in the GOG-generated page. You can easily end up with an entirely empty page.
avatar
Shambhala: Ok thanks, it is still really usefull when you own a good chunk of the catalog.
I agree, although frankly I no longer use the catalogue for anything. I do all my game browsing directly from MaGog.
Another great update...thanks! :D
How are you guys getting an update? Mine is still 2.0.1 I think.
avatar
Nirth: How are you guys getting an update? Mine is still 2.0.1 I think.
On Firefox:
Tools => Greasemonkey => Manage User Scripts...
Right click on Barefoot Essentials => Find Updates

But usually it just updates automatically for me at some point.

P.S. Current version: 2.1.7.
Post edited September 26, 2014 by mrkgnao
I use Chrome with Tampermonkey but it said there were no updates available, maybe I've downloaded it from some temporary link so mine won't update.
avatar
Nirth: I use Chrome with Tampermonkey but it said there were no updates available, maybe I've downloaded it from some temporary link so mine won't update.
You can always redownload the script anew. That should regardless of anything.
P.S. Congrats on reaching 1000.
Post edited September 26, 2014 by mrkgnao
avatar
Barefoot_Monkey: Version 2.1.7 is up, with a couple of new features. I think from now on I'll try to reply directly to those who made the feature request :)
avatar
HeDanny: Back in the olden days, we used to have a toggle that hid games we already owned in the catalog. Any chance this can be done?
avatar
Barefoot_Monkey: and this one
I love you.

Fair Dinkum, I've been asking GOG to re-instate this function for years. I suggest it in here and you get it done before the nest time I read the thread.

Total Legend.
avatar
mrkgnao: You can always redownload the script anew. That should regardless of anything.
P.S. Congrats on reaching 1000.
It worked, I don't know why I didn't think of that.

Very nice to see this still being updated.
Is there any chance that discounted games in the wishlist show the percentage of discount, the way it's on promo pages?
avatar
Barefoot_Monkey: .
Hi. Thank you very much for keeping the great work on BE2. I love many of it's features.
mrkgnao has implemented a feature involving taking information for the wishlist of the user pages in GOGWiki.

I think his job would be easier if the <ol> that encompasses the list would have an id or additional class so that any tool could easily distinguish between the wishlist and the shelf.

What do you think?
avatar
Barefoot_Monkey: .
avatar
madth3: Hi. Thank you very much for keeping the great work on BE2. I love many of it's features.
mrkgnao has implemented a feature involving taking information for the wishlist of the user pages in GOGWiki.

I think his job would be easier if the <ol> that encompasses the list would have an id or additional class so that any tool could easily distinguish between the wishlist and the shelf.

What do you think?
Trust madth3 to come up with the straightforward solution. I should probably have asked for that myself before embarking on this, but I'm not too good at asking others for help.

However, doing so now might be less beneficial, as I believe I have already ironed out the algorithm so that it correctly identifies all the 203 public wishlists on the wiki. Changing the <ol> at this point would likely break my script (e.g. I scan for the following string '<ol class="GOGUser_list">').

So if you decide to do it (and I'm not sure it's worth the trouble because I'll probably use it only to corroborate my existing algorithm (i.e. as a kind of assert)), please give me a 24-hour alert. Same goes for any major change to the gog-wishlist, gog-shelf and gog-list generators, if possible. Thanks.

P.S. May I suggest (based on [url=http://www.gogwiki.com/wiki/Special:ActiveUsers]this[/url]) that you make madth3 a wiki administrator?
avatar
mrkgnao: However, doing so now might be less beneficial, as I believe I have already ironed out the algorithm so that it correctly identifies all the 203 public wishlists on the wiki. Changing the <ol> at this point would likely break my script (e.g. I scan for the following string '<ol class="GOGUser_list">').
Well, I'd still commend you to consider if changing the script to search something like '<ol class="GOGUser_list" id="GOG_wishlist">' would not make it less susceptible to change. Thinking, for example, of new users.
:-)