cLaude83: Nice try, but I was developing both software and to a lesser extent hardware before your parents had the accident.
That's some insightful self-analysis you're projecting there.
Ryvors: im open to everything as long as its not pure stupidty, and you are just prooving my point trying to insult me instead of really think about what we are trying to say to you guys.
Uh-huh. Sure you are. Okay then, that bring us back to:
cLaude83: - Why is CDPR suppressing critical questions about their games on their own forum and on Steam?
- Why did GOG remove a joke tweet saying "Classic PC games #WontBeErased on our watch. Yeah, how's that for some use of hashtags?"?
- Why did GOG then apologize for that tweet, saying "Yesterday, we posted a tweet containing a trending hashtag as a pun. The tweet was neither intended as a malicious attack, nor as a comment to the ongoing social debate. GOG should focus only on games. We acknowledge that and we commit to it."?
- Why was the author of he first tweet, Sean 'Linko' Halliday, then still fired and subsequently libeled by GOG?
- Why did CDPR remove a joke tweet saying "Did you just assume my gender?"
- Why did CDPR then apologize for that tweet, saying "Sorry to all those offended by one of the responses sent out from our account earlier. Harming anyone was never our intention."?
- Why did CDP and daughter companies then revise hiring policy so as to increase the number of lurid-haired feminazis and gender blenders employed?
- Why is Galaxy 2.0 suddenly so much greedier with the personal data it gathers?
You really are going to have to do better than:
Ryvors: None of your points were prooven :) and you are completely wrong and dont have any clue about this genre. Your previous comment clearly shows your lack of understanding on this topic.
Because they clearly are factual and thereby 'proven' -- bit of a strange word to use when talking about undisputed events. And deflecting by pretending I talked about the genre doesn't work, because I hadn't, other than to say that made a weak argument, based on false comparisons, that has already been shot to bits several times in other topics. If you want to address those, do that in those topics -- I can't be arsed to go through the same charade of a discussion about them again.