冰汽时代

已在库内

4.4/5

( 851 Reviews )

4.4

851 Reviews

中文(简体), English & 10 更多

Posted on: April 25, 2018

TheTrueChild

验证所有者

游戏: 147 评论: 2

THE CITY MUST SURVIVE

Survival. Rarely in a game does it force you to think on the active consequences of how you decide to save a small band of refugees fighting an apocalyptic winter. Do you establish a new world order, where tyranny and rebellion is extinguished through the drone of propaganda and the burning steam of the execution chamber? Or do your citizens establish their fanatical beliefs through religion and faith, rooting out discontent by praying to the gods above? This is FROSTPUNK: a survival, city-management simulator that forces you to adapt to the cold around you and make harsh decisions that will determine the fate of your city. GAMEPLAY: -FROSTPUNK establishes a simplistic, hub section based placement of various buildings and landmarks throughout the course of your game time. Overall, it's simple enough to efficiently organize your various buildings, but gives tricky management on how you decide to place where they go. However, buildings need to be maintained through workers and connections through roads, or streets. Either way, managing building placement and worker production is key to surviving the winters. -There are three main scenarios, with three difficulty levels for you to tackle. Future content is planned, perhaps with the addition of a sandbox or more new scenarios. -Resource management dwindles quickly as the raging blizzard continues on. This is mediated through mining more resources or exploring out into the unknown. Additionally, outposts can be constructed at various places to provide you with valuable materials, -Replayability is very high, as there are many strategies you can test to further challenge your city to survive in different conditions. Overall, FROSTPUNK offers a chilling entry into the simulation genre, with lots of surprises in store. At first, it may not be easy to grasp, but beginners can quickly catch on while veterans can experiment with lots of new strategies to try out in various scenarios. THE CITY MUST SURVIVE.

这对您有帮助吗？

Posted on: May 5, 2018

kaleid0

验证所有者

游戏: 8 评论: 1

极其优秀 98/100

游戏堪称完美，很好的体现了什么叫做物质决定意识，一趟玩下来再去看考研政治会有极其深刻的体会。唯一的缺憾就是继续等待官方去更新后续内容。还有我希望能针对道路规划做更好的引导，以及加入修改道路的功能。（强迫症嘛（国情），道路修修补补改改很正常的） ———————————————————————————————————————————————————— 睿智的唯物主义者+10

这对您有帮助吗？

Posted on: March 18, 2020

shenhaitaozai

验证所有者

游戏: 9 评论: 2

改善一下平台吧！

3.18趁着打折在gog上又买了几款游戏，冰汽时代、空洞骑士和极乐迪斯科，有点冲动消费，因为我没有那么多时间玩。现在这个平台跟steam比还是有很大差距，对中国用户的友好度不是很好，几乎所有游戏都没有中文简介，界面很多地方也没有汉化，每次启动游戏时，同步总是出错。我在库里居然不能直接评论，还要跑到商店页面下找到这个游戏才能评论！真是惊呆了！希望蠢驴能改善一下

这对您有帮助吗？

Posted on: July 8, 2019

PatisonMarynowany

验证所有者

游戏: 评论: 5

Game is bad from design

This game is vastly overrated. I suspect most people giving it high scores have played one campaign on normal, got overwhelmed by beautiful graphics, music and writing, as I was at first and then forgot about it. The game suffers heavily from Early Game Hell syndrome, where playing early game is the only part worth playing that provides any difficulties. I've played main scenario on normal, hard and extreme, but all of the challenge is in the first week. After that, all you have to do is upgrade your wood and steel production, so that you have a reasonable margin to build on and as much coal and food as possible. Congratulations, you've beaten the game. The strategic "choices" that the game throws at you is managing discontent/hope and choosing between two ways of making a resource. The two ways are: the more efficient one, that costs a limited resource of steam cores, and less efficient one, where you have to use more workers for less resource, but it doesn't cost you steam cores. So in "Ark" scenario, where you have only 45 workers you use only steam core branches, in "Refugee" scenario, where you have very little steam cores on the map and a lot of people, you use only labour heavy branches, and in other scenarios you commit half of your resource production to one branch and other half to the other. That's it. Discontent/hope management is similarly laughable. Most of the time one comes at cost of the other, so you just keep discontent at almost maximum level and pump as much hope as you can. It pays to keep your people's lives more miserable than they have to be, so that you get easy quests for more hope. The Order/Faith choices are inconsequential. All they differ in is that they have slightly different boosters: order raises your hope passively through guard towers, hope actively through special buttons in the church. If you plan to buy this 30$ game for one 5-hour long playthrough, go ahead. If you want to get it's money's worth out of it, don't.

这对您有帮助吗？

Posted on: December 10, 2018

Shuffleblade

验证所有者

游戏: 35 评论: 10

Does not capitalise on its strengths

This game has an impressive setting and story but sadly the game is a simulator/strategy game with heavy focus on resourcemanagement and timemanagement. This focus in gameplay reduces the population of your city to "numbers", they are ants that does what needs to be done to creep closer to the next objective of the game. Because of this the "moral" choices never have any ethic/moral weight to them at all, you will pick the choice that makes the most sense to progress in the game. If that means putting the children to work in the factories or building carecenters where they will assist with research is a choice made by necessity. So that aspect of the game is basically nullified, what about they gameplay you ask? It is a drag, sadly for 60% of the time I spent playing this game I wished I was doing something else. Its busy work, a strategy game with a puase button where you need to micromanage stuff all the time. It is not fun stuff either, put on heater, shutdown heaters, add workers, take away workes most of the time playing this game you will do mundane task with little to none strategic relevance. The interesting choices you make in this game feel few and far apart due to the oceans of meaningless micromanaging that is needed to maximise the chances of the citys survival. I mean you could just let the time roll on and hope for the best and I did that multiple times. Sad when you realise you are purposefully skipping the gameplay due to boredom even though you know it lessens your success of victory in the end.

这对您有帮助吗？

...

124

用户评论

出错，请尝试刷新页面。

This game is waiting for a review. Take the first shot!

{{ item.percentage }}%

Awaiting more reviews

An error occurred. Please try again later.

Other ratings

Add a review

Edit a review

Your rating:

Stars and all fields are required

Not sure what to say? Start with this:

What kept you playing?
What kind of gamer would enjoy this?
Was the game fair, tough, or just right?
What’s one feature that really stood out?
Did the game run well on your setup?

不当内容。您的评论包含不良语言。不当内容。不允许使用链接。不当内容。内容包含乱码。评论标题太短。评论标题太长。评论描述太短。评论描述太长。

不知道该写什么？

由于以下原因，您无法保存您的评论:

您需要选择星级评分
您需要输入评论标题
您需要输入您的评论内容

筛选：

没有与您的要求相匹配的评论

English Deutsch polski français русский 中文(简体) 其他人

已验证所有者其他人

最近30天最近90天最近6月任何时间

发售后早期访问期间

探索 CD PROJEKT RED 的游戏

精选

Featured

接近，但不是完全匹配

冰汽时代

城市必须生存下去

制定法律

塑造你的社会

斟酌你的选择

开发新技术

探索霜冻之地

无尽模式

Other ratings

Add a review

Edit a review

Delete this review?

举报此评价

其他详情（必填）：

举报此评价