From the time when the games were good. Replayable, countless of times. Ageless. WIth the new thechnology, performace gets indeed better, but not always the games. Every re-edition, and fixes, of the older games in a new technology is: always worth doing it.
Great, in the Gog edition. Replay is worth it, as many times as you want, always a good game. And it has so many places and secrets you have missed around.
Now it's bad, with that controller spin bug. Camera looking left or right is causing it like every 10 seconds. It should be a bug fix by now, for it. It's 2025.
Old classic, always good to play again.
As we are all back to playing it again, after many years by currently Feb. 2025, with the patch now available for the high camera view: it's absolutely legendary to replay it, and many times over. One of the best RTS (3D) classics ever made. These quality classics can't get outdated, they only get better with the time.
Great game, but the player is massively underfunded. And the build times for everything are too long. Other than those two issues - it would earn our 5 stars. For now, we are leaving it at the 4 only, till that is improved. The Jan 2025, for this our review time, thanks.
Good, as we used to play this, from it's early days. But, for the campaign-wise: player is still heavily under-funded. It's very difficult to build anything, especially defense wise, due to the such under-funded default settings. Even on the 'easy' setting, it's the same problem, as well. Simply it takes too long to build anything, as the second point why it lost one from our five stars. Down to 4 stars only, for now, till perhaps another review time, once that is fixed, and the player is given some sufficient ongoing cash and shorter build times for the structures and critical units, at least. At the Jan 2025, at this review time.
