The graphics do show their age, but maybe I raise the bar a bit too high. Maybe. One issue are the characters. They are forgettable and it's very hard to build a relationship with them, with few exceptions. 'V' has that terrible brutforced voice over "please like me". 'V' should have been from the get-go on par with Adam Jensen from Deus Ex, or Joel Badass from the Last of us. Why to create such a weak protagonist is beyond me. The tremarkable open world of Night City is a gem and leaves you hours of exploring the dark and wicked parts of this Cyberpunk environment. CD Red dit a fantastic job. 100% The controls feel solid. The interasctions and button combos don't make sense at time and can be frustratingly overcomplicated especially for people with motoric disabilities. This makes Cyberpunk to the most unfriendly game and should be played by people without any disabilities. A game pad can help, but not everyone does have a gamepad or can use one. Big MINUS The Story is only a bonus and feels detached. I personally got more story out of Mass Effect, Deus Ex and the Last of us. I thought I get something similar with Cyberpunk. Cyberpunk remains a disappointment.
Playing outside the Arcade Shooters in the 90's, watching the movies etc... This feels weird, given the fact that high tech has almost overtaken Robocop. It's a unique gaming experience. However, I consider Robocop Rogue City a strictly Fan-Game. The younger generation probably will not get out as much as we do, who grew up with 90's B-Flix. As they are known to bring retro genres back to screen on the PC and console I might suggest a decent Battlestar Galactica, perhaps. If one can pull that off, it's Teyon. The Controls in the game feel solid and performance is with minor frame drops OK. Visually they did a fantastic job matching the 90's vibe of Sci-Fi to the core, very similar to the classic Alien Isolation from Creative Assembly. Do read the system requirements. They are about right.
Weird ending like you wanna sit down and someone is snatching your chair away. But still a good game, regardless. Human Revolution was better, but the graphics show their age. Excellent Soundtrack in both titles. The game is by no means "easy". You won't speed-run this like Super Mario. Some scenes you will die and die again. Be warned. Still, enjoyable, over all. Nice that this is DRM-free
they are getting better by delivering what they promised. (not every game studio does) The early bad days are history. I enjoy the game for its easy controls and the more simple concept art-ish rendering style. It's a great fun gap filler game for me, nothing too serious, more about exploring than fighting. I have no complaints at the time. What can I say? What you see is what you get. great job try to get it on discount if you can, but it's worth the money, regardless.
The first thing that came to my mind was when reading that my faction is the European Union, that if they continue like they do, they really are forced to look for a new home in space, and that even without aliens attacking them. Well, let's see what else there is appart from invading a new galaxy and start already fighting like mad. Seems games like that cannot take a peaceful approach. For example you are game over if you start fighting. Nope. Impossible. Graphics are good, not next-gen, but OK-ish. Controls are fine. The game is playable. Is this game for you? Probably yes, because you love to fight and shredd others to pieces.
Well, first, one star has to go because we are required to downgrade Fallout 4 in order to play Fallout London. If we want to play the original Fallout 4 game we have to reinstall Fallout 4. Another Star has to go because the game is badly or not optimized at all and feels rushed out. I'd take another Star off the game but it could be due to a buggy downgrade or because Fallout London is still and remains early access sort of. Another issue, that's rather subjective that I don't like spending too much time in the prologue with too much guesswork. It feels the developers must underline they are special. But they are not. Period. One has to assume Fallout London in the category of failed hype fan projects. Because that's what it is. The visual quality is mediocre compared to Fallout 4 TOG. Little effort was made to pretend it is somewhat relatet to the Fallout alternative reality genre. The pretentious Pib-Boy replacement was unimportant. The masonic vipe didn't add anything to the game but confusion and why. Fallout has nothing to do with Freemasonry. But I get it that the Scottish Rite must find its way even into games. And that's why the game content can't be of good quality. Performance I can't stop to rant and rave and won't get into detail. But that the game crawls to a halt where Fallout 4 had no problems is even more a good point to get off the hype bandwagon. Conclusion: Play this masonic trash if you must because you won't need to pay for it which would have been a ripoff if they would have charged money for this… and back to Fallout 4.
