It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Shinook: Seems like they are just testing the water, which is reasonable.
So, is a good moment to go to the grenlight and say: "First fix the current game" ?
Because I didn't had enough patience for the interface and glitches (And the stamina).
avatar
Marrik: I really hope they get someone who is fluent in both Polish and English to do the translation this time. The translation is what really kept me from getting into it.
I think they redid it some time ago and it's supremely well-written in the English translation now.
Good to hear a sequel to Inquisitor is planned. Hope it comes to GOG.
avatar
Marrik: I really hope they get someone who is fluent in both Polish and English to do the translation this time. The translation is what really kept me from getting into it.
avatar
drealmer7: I think they redid it some time ago and it's supremely well-written in the English translation now.
Although I didn't enjoy the stamina system (to the point to kill my interest on the game), I didn't find hard to read their english texts (I tried the game the last year).
avatar
drealmer7: I think they redid it some time ago and it's supremely well-written in the English translation now.
avatar
Belsirk: Although I didn't enjoy the stamina system (to the point to kill my interest on the game), I didn't find hard to read their english texts (I tried the game the last year).
The potion quaffing is a huge drag, as well as the general monster difficulty level. I highly recommend playing it in EASY difficulty to reduce the difficulty of combat and make it more enjoyable. Just spam spam spam those drink-potion keys. It is really worth it!
I'd go for a spin-off or maybe a prequel.

Style-wise, I think an adventure game with RPG elements would fit nicely.
avatar
Belsirk: Although I didn't enjoy the stamina system (to the point to kill my interest on the game), I didn't find hard to read their english texts (I tried the game the last year).
avatar
drealmer7: The potion quaffing is a huge drag, as well as the general monster difficulty level. I highly recommend playing it in EASY difficulty to reduce the difficulty of combat and make it more enjoyable. Just spam spam spam those drink-potion keys. It is really worth it!
I bought it, enjoyed it, up until an assassin killed me in town...Too easily as the game's difficulty is in potion-spamming and an infuriating randomized dice roll-button-masher which is worthless in an action RPG...I consoled my attributes/Skills up to near fifty and it STILL took more than 5 re-fills of my health (As well as 4 of my newly repaired weapons) and eight of the stamina in order to beat him...

And since I don't cheat stats-to-win (Testing the "balance" of the game, didn't save) nor do I ever play on "easy" I will however, console potions which is why I ended up buying this game, but I still ended up uninstalling it, as it's too unbalanced for the battle mechanic that it uses, if it was turn-based, it would have been on par with Baldur's gate/Divine Divinity/Torment as it stands, my HDD has been lightened, unfortunately, as it's a flawless piece of work nonetheless...
avatar
takezodunmer2005: ...
It is the only game I have ever played on EASY. I'm normally a medium/normal difficulty guy and sometimes I'll do advanced/hard depending on how I feel. But Inquisitor is plenty hard enough on easy, like, wow, it's hard! I can't imagine trying to do some of the harder battles on anything but easy. But also, my first char (and only char I've played with) was a Paladin, and they apparently are harder to play with than the Thief or Priest, but still, yeah, easy is the wtg for this game simply because of the combat mechanics/potion-quaffing, it's well worth it though!
avatar
takezodunmer2005: ...
avatar
drealmer7: It is the only game I have ever played on EASY. I'm normally a medium/normal difficulty guy and sometimes I'll do advanced/hard depending on how I feel. But Inquisitor is plenty hard enough on easy, like, wow, it's hard! I can't imagine trying to do some of the harder battles on anything but easy. But also, my first char (and only char I've played with) was a Paladin, and they apparently are harder to play with than the Thief or Priest, but still, yeah, easy is the wtg for this game simply because of the combat mechanics/potion-quaffing, it's well worth it though!
Hmmm, seeing as I started out on Paladin, I might reinstall to try out the thief, even though I like the Paladin's lawful good ethos as far as this game's world is concerned...Bah, I'm usually a chaotic good char anyways, I suppose I could try again...
avatar
drealmer7: It is the only game I have ever played on EASY. I'm normally a medium/normal difficulty guy and sometimes I'll do advanced/hard depending on how I feel. But Inquisitor is plenty hard enough on easy, like, wow, it's hard! I can't imagine trying to do some of the harder battles on anything but easy. But also, my first char (and only char I've played with) was a Paladin, and they apparently are harder to play with than the Thief or Priest, but still, yeah, easy is the wtg for this game simply because of the combat mechanics/potion-quaffing, it's well worth it though!
avatar
takezodunmer2005: Hmmm, seeing as I started out on Paladin, I might reinstall to try out the thief, even though I like the Paladin's lawful good ethos as far as this game's world is concerned...Bah, I'm usually a chaotic good char anyways, I suppose I could try again...
I actually semi-planned out 3 characters that I wanted to play for the 3 classes since it has such role-playing variety+consequences. The Paladin (on pause for now, I haven't played in a while because got a bug that made me start over [don't tab out of the game] and, well, I am thinking maybe I'll start the Thief I'm thinking about) I am doing a mixed character, making moral choices and not too influenced by the church but still doing his job and where he can, doing things that advantage him and making money, more out for himself, wary of the authorities but not getting too far out of line, also will turn to torture out of duty to make sure he has the Truth - a little bit of a grey character.

Then, when I play again, whenever that may be, a Priest that is absolutely corrupt, evil, loves to torture, pawn of the church who pushes their motives forward and, well, we will see where it leads me, I'm pretty sure it'll be fun (I typically play chaotic-good, but, when the options for evil are so fleshed out, it can be fun to play that way.)

And perhaps whenever I might play it again after that (could be 15 years!), I want to do a Thief who is a do-gooder, never for profit, but all for the right and good choice and finding the Truth and making sure the bad-guys are all caught and made to meet justice and never torturing any one.

You can play any way with any character, really, you don't have to be tied to any way with any character, though that might be obvious.

Definitely give it another go, it's great, despite its roughness.
avatar
takezodunmer2005: Hmmm, seeing as I started out on Paladin, I might reinstall to try out the thief, even though I like the Paladin's lawful good ethos as far as this game's world is concerned...Bah, I'm usually a chaotic good char anyways, I suppose I could try again...
avatar
drealmer7: I actually semi-planned out 3 characters that I wanted to play for the 3 classes since it has such role-playing variety+consequences. The Paladin (on pause for now, I haven't played in a while because got a bug that made me start over [don't tab out of the game] and, well, I am thinking maybe I'll start the Thief I'm thinking about) I am doing a mixed character, making moral choices and not too influenced by the church but still doing his job and where he can, doing things that advantage him and making money, more out for himself, wary of the authorities but not getting too far out of line, also will turn to torture out of duty to make sure he has the Truth - a little bit of a grey character.

Then, when I play again, whenever that may be, a Priest that is absolutely corrupt, evil, loves to torture, pawn of the church who pushes their motives forward and, well, we will see where it leads me, I'm pretty sure it'll be fun (I typically play chaotic-good, but, when the options for evil are so fleshed out, it can be fun to play that way.)

And perhaps whenever I might play it again after that (could be 15 years!), I want to do a Thief who is a do-gooder, never for profit, but all for the right and good choice and finding the Truth and making sure the bad-guys are all caught and made to meet justice and never torturing any one.

You can play any way with any character, really, you don't have to be tied to any way with any character, though that might be obvious.

Definitely give it another go, it's great, despite its roughness.
Thanks, you provide a very interesting and compelling case, yeah I re-started a thief and am killing the bats pretty quick so far as compared to my paladin, but it's still a bit pointless being an archer as unlike divinity I-IV, you can't run from enemies so fighting with a bow is absolutely pointless as they run up to you within melee distance anyways! X^D

I wonder how dex favors your hit rate? If it improves it I'll be pumping my characters with dex/con/int! What good is being strong when you have to miss 18 times in order to land 2 hits? ;^)
Any word on Inquisitor 2? I loved this one.
avatar
drealmer7: I actually semi-planned out 3 characters that I wanted to play for the 3 classes since it has such role-playing variety+consequences. The Paladin (on pause for now, I haven't played in a while because got a bug that made me start over [don't tab out of the game] and, well, I am thinking maybe I'll start the Thief I'm thinking about) I am doing a mixed character, making moral choices and not too influenced by the church but still doing his job and where he can, doing things that advantage him and making money, more out for himself, wary of the authorities but not getting too far out of line, also will turn to torture out of duty to make sure he has the Truth - a little bit of a grey character.

Then, when I play again, whenever that may be, a Priest that is absolutely corrupt, evil, loves to torture, pawn of the church who pushes their motives forward and, well, we will see where it leads me, I'm pretty sure it'll be fun (I typically play chaotic-good, but, when the options for evil are so fleshed out, it can be fun to play that way.)

And perhaps whenever I might play it again after that (could be 15 years!), I want to do a Thief who is a do-gooder, never for profit, but all for the right and good choice and finding the Truth and making sure the bad-guys are all caught and made to meet justice and never torturing any one.

You can play any way with any character, really, you don't have to be tied to any way with any character, though that might be obvious.

Definitely give it another go, it's great, despite its roughness.
I'm just restarting this game again, loved it the first time I played it years ago but I didn't finish. Did you manage to play through it again like you planned with your Thief character? If so, how'd it go? I've played Priest the first time, and now I'm doing a Paladin.
avatar
vulchor: I'm just restarting this game again, loved it the first time I played it years ago but I didn't finish. Did you manage to play through it again like you planned with your Thief character? If so, how'd it go? I've played Priest the first time, and now I'm doing a Paladin.
my first playthrough got bugged and I had to start over

started over as as thief, and am liking it a lot still, but haven't gotten very far