Posted July 27, 2015

Crosmando
chrono commando
Registered: Jan 2012
From Australia

227
New User
Registered: May 2011
From United States
Posted July 27, 2015

(Unless GOG wants to give me unlimited power, in which case I'm totally fine with it and vow to uphold the standards of megalomania set by moderators elsewhere.)
But seriously, the lack of moderation is one of the best things here. I've only seen a couple threads locked for bad behavior in all my years here, whereas on the CDPR forums, I've had untold numbers of posts replaced with pony pictures. Which is a thing that happens there.

CarrionCrow
.
Registered: May 2011
From United States
Posted July 27, 2015

Every other site aspect - Galaxy, the forums, the account system, every other thing, it's all in beta, with no timeframe for when any portion of it will leave that beta state.

its like this is the test forum before the results are rolled in to the cpr forums and we are left with the dregs
If they have limited resources, I'd rather they continue on getting more games and making sure they work as well as possible.
Not spending time comparing one forum to another since this is the only one I use, and the only one I intend to use.
If it all falls apart, either from technical failure, getting buried in shitheads, or both, I'll set up a forum and bring the good people I've met along when I go.

Goodaltgamer
New User
Registered: Oct 2014
From Germany

dick1982
-120 Club. ♥XX
Registered: Jul 2012
From United Kingdom
Posted July 27, 2015
i would vote for moving all witcher-related threads on gog.com to them (http://forums.cdprojektred.com/forums/6)
especially if they're left-handed,crippled and use steam.
especially if they're left-handed,crippled and use steam.

Emob78
jack and coke plz
Registered: Dec 2012
From United States
Posted July 27, 2015

jsjrodman
dorkface
Registered: Dec 2011
From United States
Posted July 27, 2015


Just think of moderation ;)
Can of worms, I only say ;)
Farming it out to random unaccountable joe-schmoes doesn't really work.

Goodaltgamer
New User
Registered: Oct 2014
From Germany
Posted July 27, 2015

Farming it out to random unaccountable joe-schmoes doesn't really work.
Farming it out, we do agree, it just doesn't work.
But just as a thought: Giving this to somebody elected by the community? (like minimum requirement to vote, being at least here for 6 month, for example?)
OK, would mean doing the job of somebody else, BUT the freedom we have here is priceless ;) AS mentioned by others, hey it feels like heaven (with also quite some drawbacks though....)
But back to the topic, what do you define high service for a free product?

BillyMaysFan59
gone (but still playing his games)
Registered: Nov 2013
From United States

timppu
Favorite race: Formula__One
Registered: Jun 2011
From Finland
Posted July 27, 2015
Because they feel we are not quite mature enough for the third class yet.

Grargar
Insert cat to continue
Registered: Aug 2012
From Greece

Cyraxpt
ZzZzZz
Registered: Feb 2011
From Portugal

jsjrodman
dorkface
Registered: Dec 2011
From United States
Posted July 28, 2015
I was talking about the overall "service level" for the "store".
In a physical store, I can talk to someone about the products. If the product does not work as advertised, I (theoretically) can ask about the problem in person and maybe it will get resolved.
For expensive products, some types of service may come free. For example I purchased a 1,800$US bicycle. The shop did a variety of parts exchanges and the service to get them installed at no cost to me, because they believed this was part of the service that they should offer as part of the purchase.
I'm not saying GOG *should* offer a high level of service, but responsiveness, accuracy, dealing with problems promptly, etc would to me be a high level of service for a digital software seller.
I don't know what that would really cost. I'm suspicious prices would have to be significantly higher, possibly over double, and I doubt there's a significant audience available to make such a thing viable in the face of lower prices elsewhere. Which was why i said it might not be possible.
In a physical store, I can talk to someone about the products. If the product does not work as advertised, I (theoretically) can ask about the problem in person and maybe it will get resolved.
For expensive products, some types of service may come free. For example I purchased a 1,800$US bicycle. The shop did a variety of parts exchanges and the service to get them installed at no cost to me, because they believed this was part of the service that they should offer as part of the purchase.
I'm not saying GOG *should* offer a high level of service, but responsiveness, accuracy, dealing with problems promptly, etc would to me be a high level of service for a digital software seller.
I don't know what that would really cost. I'm suspicious prices would have to be significantly higher, possibly over double, and I doubt there's a significant audience available to make such a thing viable in the face of lower prices elsewhere. Which was why i said it might not be possible.

Goodaltgamer
New User
Registered: Oct 2014
From Germany

jsjrodman
dorkface
Registered: Dec 2011
From United States
Posted July 28, 2015
Don't be tedious.
I was replying to this comment here.
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/why_are_we_being_treated_like_second_class_citizens/post41
It does not speak specifically of the forums.
Independently, GOG.com is effectively a store. The forums are not the the whole store, but they are indeed part of the overall experience.
Personally, I have no problems with the forums, and do not believe a change is needed (save perhaps the bugs.)
Your remaining comments are based around some idea that I believe such a level of service should be offered, and are arguing against it. Have fun with that straw man.
I was replying to this comment here.
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/why_are_we_being_treated_like_second_class_citizens/post41
It does not speak specifically of the forums.
Independently, GOG.com is effectively a store. The forums are not the the whole store, but they are indeed part of the overall experience.
Personally, I have no problems with the forums, and do not believe a change is needed (save perhaps the bugs.)
Your remaining comments are based around some idea that I believe such a level of service should be offered, and are arguing against it. Have fun with that straw man.