It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Nirth: I don't understand how that is difficult to code, there must be a reason why they don't put any personnel to look at it.
I've worked with 1-2 other sites that have probably the size of GoG. They probably have 1-2 coders total for web based stuff. If they aren't available, then you just gotta wait until they are, unless they call them back as an emergency.

But more so is a badly written SQL statement can literally wipe the entire database clean. It's quite easy to do, although i haven't don't that personally. Still they have logs they can sift through, and a lot of them to figure out what the easiest way to block bot creation without resorting to IP blocking (as VPN/proxy gets around that).
I've reported some in the BG forum, but it just keeps coming. This has to be sorted from the site itself.
avatar
rtcvb32: But more so is a badly written SQL statement can literally wipe the entire database clean. It's quite easy to do, although i haven't don't that personally. Still they have logs they can sift through, and a lot of them to figure out what the easiest way to block bot creation without resorting to IP blocking (as VPN/proxy gets around that).
Doesn't a simple picture verification work?
avatar
Nirth: Doesn't a simple picture verification work?
You mean captcha. Sure that can work i suppose... but remember there's probably only 1-2 web developers. They might also be testing solutions on a testing environment to see how it works, if the solutions will even work, if it will be safe to implement without breaking the system or accidentally resetting the DB, etc.

It could be more than that, perhaps there's a license/fee they don't want to have to pay, or maybe they have their own picture verification they want you to use, or perhaps some simple logical puzzle i see on forums to get verification you're human, be it simple math, which isn't a vowel, which animals have hair, which names are months/planets/days, etc.

But if they stop it via captcha, what if the bot already has 50,000 accounts? Yeah i'm sure it will be easy to spot... but you can't blindly delete accounts, although the pattern they are using make it pretty easy to find them. (Although if they don't own any games, i'd happily delete them all and apologize if i accidentally hit a real user, re-signing up is minimal vs hours of manual labor for users).

I really don't know why they are taking so long. Some of the site changes have annoyed me, but nothing truly deal breaking...
avatar
Pangaea666: it just keeps coming. This has to be sorted from the site itself.
That's what i've been saying.
Post edited January 30, 2015 by rtcvb32
Just reported a bunch of them.
That gave me a good chuckle, though. :D
Post edited January 30, 2015 by Pardinuz
A simple CAPTCHA upon registering should keep some spambots at bay, right now it's way too easy for them to create new accounts. Not a complete solution, but it'd be a good (and easy to implement, i think) start.
What about a requirement that a register user has actually purchased something before being allowed to post in the forums? Not the best solution, I admit, but it might be better than having a captcha code every time you want to post.
avatar
blakekl: What about a requirement that a register user has actually purchased something before being allowed to post in the forums? Not the best solution, I admit, but it might be better than having a captcha code every time you want to post.
Not a CAPTCHA for every post, that'd be highly annoying and useless; just one when you register on GOG the first time.

Edit: A purchase requirement doesn't seem like a good idea, it could scare potential customers/community members away (I wouldn't have registered if a purchase was a prerequisite, for one).
Post edited January 30, 2015 by Aturuxo
avatar
darthspudius: No one likes you, go away! :D
avatar
snowkatt: sir permission to shoot spuddy sir !

in the groin sir !
Ehh. Permission granted.
avatar
snowkatt: sir permission to shoot spuddy sir !

in the groin sir !
avatar
zaine-h: Ehh. Permission granted.
sir yes sir !

ill get my cannon sir !
avatar
snowkatt: sir permission to shoot spuddy sir !

in the groin sir !
avatar
zaine-h: Ehh. Permission granted.
Traitor! Your soul will meet my blade in Hell!!! >_<
avatar
Pardinuz: Just reported a bunch of them.
That gave me a good chuckle, though. :D
Snitch :-)
avatar
Aturuxo: Edit: A purchase requirement doesn't seem like a good idea, it could scare potential customers/community members away (I wouldn't have registered if a purchase was a prerequisite, for one).
There are many users who don't come to the forums for years after they've used GoG. A purchase would add a huge level of risk to spammers as well. So honestly it's not a bad idea... Unless of course they start doing charge-backs on credit cards immediately after getting access to the fourms... That wouldn't be good.
So why hasn't that spammer been banned yet? Another 10-ish threads in BG now. If it's similar in many other subforums too, there is a ton and a half of this stuff. Sigh.
avatar
Aturuxo: Edit: A purchase requirement doesn't seem like a good idea, it could scare potential customers/community members away (I wouldn't have registered if a purchase was a prerequisite, for one).
avatar
rtcvb32: There are many users who don't come to the forums for years after they've used GoG. A purchase would add a huge level of risk to spammers as well. So honestly it's not a bad idea...
Yes it is. It's an extremely bad idea. It would be alienating potential customers, which is a very poor strategy for any business.