.Keys: Still, I will give myself the right to doubt that the majority of companies planned all of this line of thinking towards other stores. Maybe the majority just don't have enough communication with the DRM-Free community and principles?
GamezRanker: So you actually think the reason why some of the big AAA companies don't have some games here is because they're unaware of GOG and/or DRM free?
Some AAA companies, yes, AAA majority, don't.
Small to medium size companies, unaware of GOG and DRM Free market? Of course.
I mean, it's been proven time and time again that when we contact a indie dev / medium dev company, they start thinking and in fact release their game here on GOG, if GOG accept it.
~~~~~
MysterD: About Bethesda games, I would guess now w/ Microsoft owning them, you'll likely see their games - especially newer ones - more so pushed onto Xbox for PC Store and Game Pass.
I'm not a big fan of newer Bethesda games, really, so I don't care about them being drm full, if people like to enjoy them this way. (dlcs, lootboxes, denuvos and the like...) And if for them to be released here, GOG would need to stop being DRM Free, then please never release them here.
~~~~~
MysterD: Also, I don't think GOG sales overall are even close to what say Steam sales for games are. At this point, many are likely to just push their games onto Steam.
Marketing is fully on Steam. Steam even appear installed in movies pcs nowdays. You're right, still we can try. I will probably be contacting two Indie Devs to know if they can release their game here on GOG, hope they accept it too.
~~~~~
patrikc: Perhaps GOG can shed some light on the matter...
Thankfully, New Vegas is here. Which is arguably the best product Bethesda has put up for sale in years. And for that they have Obsidian to thank to.
"Obsidian's Fallout". You're just convincing me to buy New Vegas again here on GOG.
~~~~~
tfishell: Really though I continue to think it's ultimately just down to GOG not making enough money to interest them. edit: that may be an oversimplication, since a forced client as DRM allows data gathering and that can be important.
You got a valid point I believe. But to interest some of those companies, GOG would need to focus in a equal market style, a.k.a Steam like - drm'ed. Specially for data gathering, offline log storages, background connections etc which is, eh, really bad, right? :(
~~~~~
Good infos Canuck! Thank you! Inline with what I was asking for. Thanks for sharing, really.
That link isn't working by the way:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016762451000049 But I liked the first one, specially because of this:
"Depending on the market structure, higher content quality may strengthen or weaken the adoption of DRM. However, it would seem that, as the network environment becomes more decentralized and uncontrolled, weaker DRM protection should be a better strategy."
~~~~~
KetobaK: Big companies still think DRM Free is equal to easy piracy, even if their games were cracked ages ago, probably we will recive Skyrim later this year, Oblivion arrived 10 years after it's release, and they will tried to squez Skyrim for a few dollars more this year for sure, but nothing confirmed yet.
We know they're wrong about the DRM = less piracy, like people said before, it's exactly the contrary and they prejudice their own clients with this... I'd like to say again that the reason I came to GOG was that I was tired with Steam DRMs and layers of DRMs on top of layers to just launch a game. This is really annoying and a disrespect with clients.
Would be nice to have Skyrim here on GOG. Let's hope. :)