It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Kardwill: The man gleefully described how anyone different from himself was bound to the lower pits of hell, and took an obvious great pleasure in doing so.
...and sharing this same attitude (which OP apparently does) is somehow better because...your opinion is more "right", I guess?
low rated
avatar
babark: I don't think he was influential enough to really dislike so much. The only people who took him seriously were conspiracy nutters anyhow.
And their children suffered as a result.

--
I'm sad that he died before Nov 9. Phillies Schlafly, Chick... if Pat Robertson doesn't make it, it'll be a minor (inter)national tragedy.
low rated
avatar
Darvond: I didn't cry when Antonin Scalia died, I won't cry when Trump dies, I won't cry when Rush Limbaugh dies. They first need to earn the basic respect of showing human decency.
avatar
tremere110: Not crying and feeling joy when somebody dies are different things. Schadenfreude is a sign you could be a sociopath after all.
Are you saying that when a blight like Trump or Alex Jones goes off the mortal coil, that I cannot feel happy that the world is without them?

As Max Plank said,
"Truth never triumphs — its opponents just die out."
and
"Science advances one funeral at a time."

People like Jack Chick have had plenty of times to let go of their hatred. To lose them is not of consequence, but rather a shining moment. Because it means one less person is out there who believes playing D&D is a great way to get in contact with the occult, rather than just attending the weekly meetings and asking nicely.

Am I happy that he's dead? Perhaps a bit. Would it have been wrong to be reading the obituaries in 1945 only to read that Adolf was gone? At the very least, I think I could take some satisfaction in reading that obituary.
avatar
joelandsonja: Not cool dude ...
Well, neither is implying that turning down witness to a man is a ticket straight to Hades.
Post edited October 28, 2016 by Darvond
avatar
Darvond: Would it have been wrong to be reading the obituaries in 1945 only to read that Adolf was gone? At the very least, I think I could take some satisfaction in reading that obituary.
Adolf Hitler tortured and killed millions of people.
Jack Chick drew cartoons.

If you equate somebody sharing a controversial viewpoint with a mass murderer, I'm not sure what to tell you, because you're just as filled with hate as you accuse him of being.

He believed D&D players were setting themselves up for occultism and sought to share his beliefs because he legitimately felt that he was trying to help save people by doing so. You believe he was the scum of the earth for holding this viewpoint/writing a cartoon about it and believe that by rejoicing, you can triumph as The One With The Best Opinion and have others agree with your wonderful mindset.
In that sense, he was a better individual than you're acting like right now.
Post edited October 28, 2016 by zeogold
avatar
Darvond: So you remember those unfunny, weird, racist, and factually ignorant little comic books with the distinct covers?
I can't say I do, even though I was born before 2000. Must be some US-only thing then.

What was that linked cover about anyway? Three red devils laughing together, and a text "Somebody goofed. J.T.C.".

Oh the horror, what an awful cover! I feel sooooo disgusted now! (not really)
Post edited October 28, 2016 by timppu
low rated
avatar
Darvond: Would it have been wrong to be reading the obituaries in 1945 only to read that Adolf was gone? At the very least, I think I could take some satisfaction in reading that obituary.
avatar
zeogold: Adolf Hitler tortured and killed millions of people.
Jack Chick drew cartoons.

If you equate somebody sharing a controversial viewpoint with a mass murderer, I'm not sure what to tell you, because you're just as filled with hate as you accuse him of being.
Jack Chick wishes a fate worse than death upon millions of people, imagining them in an eternal fire that never ceases.
avatar
Darvond: So you remember those unfunny, weird, racist, and factually ignorant little comic books with the distinct covers?
avatar
timppu: I can't say I do, even though I was born before 2000. Must be some US-only thing then.
Well, I've linked a few throughout the thread. Feel free to peer into the well of insanity.
Post edited October 28, 2016 by Darvond
avatar
zeogold: Adolf Hitler tortured and killed millions of people.
Jack Chick drew cartoons.

If you equate somebody sharing a controversial viewpoint with a mass murderer, I'm not sure what to tell you, because you're just as filled with hate as you accuse him of being.
avatar
Darvond: Jack Chick wishes a fate worse than death upon millions of people, imagining them in an eternal fire that never ceases.
So imagining a whole bunch of people in worse fates than death is worse than actually going out and killing them?

You know, when you say stuff like that you do realize it makes you sound as much a nutjob as those you decry.
avatar
Darvond: Jack Chick wishes a fate worse than death upon millions of people, imagining them in an eternal fire that never ceases.
And you wish that same fate on him, Trump, and others.

He can imagine all he wants, as can you. Neither of you, however, have actually DONE anything. That's the difference.
I could make the argument that he doesn't actually wish that fate upon these people, but I'm going to avoid turning this into the inevitable path of a Christian/religion-bashing thread, which I can already see this heading in.
Post edited October 28, 2016 by zeogold
May he rest in piss. Fuck him.
avatar
Kardwill: The man gleefully described how anyone different from himself was bound to the lower pits of hell, and took an obvious great pleasure in doing so.
avatar
zeogold: ...and sharing this same attitude (which OP apparently does) is somehow better because...your opinion is more "right", I guess?
Well, you have a point (and I'm not particularly proud of the fact that I smiled when I learned about his death). I could say there's at least a quantitative difference (wishing it upon 1 guy vs wishing it upon pretty much 90% of the human population like Chick did), but that feels silly

And, well, Chick is (err... was) a private bogeyman for the TTRPG community. Part of the big anti-D&D craze a few years ago, which let to much bad blood. For some players, book burning/pastor or family interventions/gaming circle forcibly closed were real life stuff and not simply silly comic books from a madman.
So for many, it's a personal feud and not simply a disagreement.

But I agree on one point : Dancing on his grave feels inappropriate. And more importantly, it gives the nutter too much importance. He was a pathetic fool, and that kind of guy should not be hated, but mercilessly mocked and ridiculed. Like what was attempted by the guys who made the movie adaptation of "Dark Dungeon" and offered a RPG as a stretch goal of the kickstarter.

So I think I will purchase my first movie on GOG (https://www.gog.com/movie/dark_dungeons). You know, to properly celebr.. err.. commemorate the event.
Post edited October 28, 2016 by Kardwill
low rated
avatar
Darvond: Jack Chick wishes a fate worse than death upon millions of people, imagining them in an eternal fire that never ceases.
avatar
tremere110: So imagining a whole bunch of people in worse fates than death is worse than actually going out and killing them?

You know, when you say stuff like that you do realize it makes you sound as much a nutjob as those you decry.
The implication is that regardless of how they died, they now have to suffer beyond their normal deaths. Would you wish that on anyone?
avatar
Kardwill: And, well, Chick is (err... was) a private bogeyman for the TTRPG community. Part of the big anti-D&D craze a few years ago, which let to much bad blood. For some players, book burning/pastor or family interventions/gaming circle forcibly closed were real life stuff and not simply silly comic books from a madman.
So for many, it's a personal feud and not simply a disagreement.
This may have been an opinion of his, but how does that make him responsible? As you said, there were family interventions, book burnings, etc., so....isn't that the fault of the people doing it? From what I can tell, Chick did nothing but parrot opinions which were already there, unless you're saying people followed his every comic and revered him like the head of a cult or something.
avatar
Darvond: Would you wish that on anyone?
You sure seem to.

And again, I point out that, from what I can tell, Chick didn't seem to actually want people to experience these fates. Seems more like a warning than a willful "I WANT YOU TO BURN IN HELL" sort of thing, which is fairly consistent with most Christians, save for some of the more radical groups.
Post edited October 28, 2016 by zeogold
avatar
Darvond: Jack Chick wishes a fate worse than death upon millions of people, imagining them in an eternal fire that never ceases.
avatar
zeogold: And you wish that same fate on him, Trump, and others.

He can imagine all he wants, as can you. Neither of you, however, have actually DONE anything.
I don't think the OP is wishind eternal damnation on him, he's just happy that the guy won't be spreading his hate propaganda any more. I agree with you that rejoicing at someone's death is not very nice, it's generally frowned upon in our calture and all, but at least try to understand where the OP is coming from - that man didn't just hold some "differing opinions", he was actively spreading hatred and "informing" about non-existant conspiracies, trying to make certain groups like the jews or gays or (gasp) nerds into enemies. That is not "doing nothing". That is very dangerous.
Post edited October 28, 2016 by Breja
avatar
Kardwill: And, well, Chick is (err... was) a private bogeyman for the TTRPG community. Part of the big anti-D&D craze a few years ago, which let to much bad blood. For some players, book burning/pastor or family interventions/gaming circle forcibly closed were real life stuff and not simply silly comic books from a madman.
So for many, it's a personal feud and not simply a disagreement.
avatar
zeogold: This may have been an opinion of his, but how does that make him responsible? As you said, there were family interventions, book burnings, etc., so....isn't that the fault of the people doing it? From what I can tell, Chick did nothing but parrot opinions which were already there, unless you're saying people followed his every comic and revered him like the head of a cult or something.
avatar
Darvond: Would you wish that on anyone?
avatar
zeogold: You sure seem to.

And again, I point out that, from what I can tell, Chick didn't seem to actually want people to experience these fates. Seems more like a warning than a willful "I WANT YOU TO BURN IN HELL" sort of thing, which is fairly consistent with most Christians, save for some of the more radical groups.
Take a look at this.

Now which group do you think he fell into?
avatar
Breja: that man didn't just hold some "differing opinions", he was actively spreading hatred and "informing" about non-existant conspiracies, trying to make certain groups like the jews into enemies. That is not "doing nothing", That is very dangerous, and while it not equivalent to Hitler's crimes, let's remember those crimes would never heave happened have the groundwork for the hatred that fueled them was not laid by people like Chick.
There's gotta be a hundred or so other cartoonists out there doing the same thing, though. How is it that Chick deserves some kind of special hatred to the point that OP's made a grave-dancing thread about it?

avatar
Darvond: Take a look at this.

Now which group do you think he fell into?
Could you point me to a specific comic? There's no way in heck I'm reading all of those.
Post edited October 28, 2016 by zeogold