Posted March 27, 2019
Can we stay on topic please? 
 
No? All right then, just a quick note regarding the EU, and centralized decisionmaking in certain areas in general: It's not that the EU is a bad thing, far from it. Without the EU, environmental standards, food safety, workers' rights, consumer protection, public services, individual rights and freedoms, privacy regulations, citizen input and participation at the national level, corporate control, large scale tax evasion, corruption, in some places even the justice system, overall situation of the less wealthy countries, and in a number of ways of the wealthy ones as well, all of these, and I'm sure I missed plenty, would be way worse. Often, due to the need to obtain majority approval from groups with very different and often conflicting interests, the EU's decisions lack courage and vision, they end up being very watered down, a mere shadow of what they'd need to be, and that's what needs fixing, but even so in most cases the end result is a far lesser evil than what they'd be without the EU, or something similar to it.
 
In this particular case, the EU caused a huge problem, but that's due to wrong decisions made by the people currently leading it and making decisions there, so demand to change the people (as long as you know who you'd rather change them with), add principles that must be adhered to, checks and balances, but not the dismantling of the whole thing. That's like, I don't know, demanding to ban trains and take out train tracks because a drunk conductor messed with the controls and derailed a train into a crowd. It's a major tragedy, but not the fault of trains or train tracks, which are very good things that need to be improved and promoted a whole lot more, over other means of transportation.
No? All right then, just a quick note regarding the EU, and centralized decisionmaking in certain areas in general: It's not that the EU is a bad thing, far from it. Without the EU, environmental standards, food safety, workers' rights, consumer protection, public services, individual rights and freedoms, privacy regulations, citizen input and participation at the national level, corporate control, large scale tax evasion, corruption, in some places even the justice system, overall situation of the less wealthy countries, and in a number of ways of the wealthy ones as well, all of these, and I'm sure I missed plenty, would be way worse. Often, due to the need to obtain majority approval from groups with very different and often conflicting interests, the EU's decisions lack courage and vision, they end up being very watered down, a mere shadow of what they'd need to be, and that's what needs fixing, but even so in most cases the end result is a far lesser evil than what they'd be without the EU, or something similar to it.
In this particular case, the EU caused a huge problem, but that's due to wrong decisions made by the people currently leading it and making decisions there, so demand to change the people (as long as you know who you'd rather change them with), add principles that must be adhered to, checks and balances, but not the dismantling of the whole thing. That's like, I don't know, demanding to ban trains and take out train tracks because a drunk conductor messed with the controls and derailed a train into a crowd. It's a major tragedy, but not the fault of trains or train tracks, which are very good things that need to be improved and promoted a whole lot more, over other means of transportation.
 
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
 

 
  
  
  
 
 
  
 