It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Elmofongo: Becasue as of now to play the latest games at max graphics while still at 60+ FPS my 970 is not gonna cut it anymore.

So I am asking this question by asking long time GTX users who upgrades regularly how long does it usually take for Nvdia to reduce the prices on their graphics cards?
Get your $30 back from the NVIDIA settlement first. Then dream about NVIDIA lowering their prices later.

Unless you're running at 144hz then a 1060 or 480 are fine for 1080p.
avatar
Siegor: Interesting thread. I've been meaning to upgrade my own graphics cards but I'm clueless as to what to buy. Are those you mentioned good for someone who doesn't really care for graphics but likes to be able to run the newest games without problems? Any other reccomendations?
AMDs new RX 480 is worth checking out, especially if you play in 1920 x 1080 resolution. It costs roughly 200 -250 depending whether you go for the 4GB or 8GB model.
If that is too expensive the RX 470 is due out soon and should be good enough for most games at that resolution.
avatar
Elmofongo: Yes I have a 1080p monitor and I run a GTX 970 on my PC.

And let's just say Witcher 3 at ultra still has Framerate dips.

Also the PC is at risk overheat shutdown playing the game because I clocked the game at 69 celsius (is that too hot?)
avatar
Elisebathe: 69 degrees on your CPU, or your GPU? If it is your GPU then no, it is not too hot, in fact you should start worrying only if it gets past 85 degrees, even if the maximum temperature that is specified by Nvidia is 98 degrees, though I would advise not to get to that point, however if it is your CPU then yes, that is too hot. You can check this site what is the maximum temperature your CPU can reach until the BIOS shut down.

http://www.cpu-world.com/index.html
Well that is reassuring since I can confirm its GPU temp.

And I disabled the auto shutdown if GPU gets too overheated, I will just stop playing the game after awhile.
avatar
MaximumBunny: Get your $30 back from the NVIDIA settlement first.
valid only for US
avatar
Doc0075: RX 470 is due out soon
AMD Announces Radeon RX 470 & RX 460 Specifications, Shipping in Early August
Post edited July 31, 2016 by mobutu
2 years
avatar
Elmofongo: Becasue as of now to play the latest games at max graphics while still at 60+ FPS my 970 is not gonna cut it anymore.

So I am asking this question by asking long time GTX users who upgrades regularly how long does it usually take for Nvdia to reduce the prices on their graphics cards?

I assume they do it the moment they release a new one?

And if so how much is reduced like say the 1070 right now is 400+ dollars, once they release a 1100 or something they cut the price of the older model in half?
The 970 still has some longevity, I originally purchased mine to handle Longest Journey 2 and ultimately The Witcher 3 after it was announced. I think I paid $341.99 for mine in May 2015, looking at the same card now, it is $279.99, roughly $60 less a year later.

It played The Witcher 3 quite well and is fairly adequate for playing today's VR games too, even with a slight adjustment to the super-sampling for clarity.

Unless you are a philanthropist and prefer to be frugal, don't purchase "founder edition" cards, they are just stock implementations and there are usually tweaked cards put out by 3rd party hardware vendors at a lower cost (of course nVidia doesn't want to compete with them, which is why they are priced much higher).

I think my my next card (but I'll be saving my pennies for the next several months) is going to be a GTX 1080, however, I don't expect it to go down in price very much (hopefully I can catch a good one on sale), but I do want it to be able to keep up with the emerging VR titles, as I think it will be important when the AAA titles start hitting the medium.
As for the new cards dropping in price - whenever the next gen comes out

I managed to pick up a brand new 2nd 980 TI for <$550AUD (RRP was ~$1100 at the time - now around $800ish) a couple of weeks ago - the 980 TI in SLI tends to beat 1 1080 in SLI supported games - for quite a bit cheaper

And I'll still be rocking out decent FPS for a while yet in any respect
Post edited July 31, 2016 by Bigs
avatar
Bigs: I managed to pick up a brand new 2nd 980 TI for <$550AUD (RRP was ~$1100 at the time - now around $800ish) a couple of weeks ago - the 980 TI in SLI tends to beat 1 1080 in SLI supported games - for quite a bit cheaper
The one issue with games in VR is that they really need to be kept around 90 fps and the current engines don't support an SLI configuration at them moment, while custom engine changes or software can take advantage of it.

For people who are considering VR options, the 970 GTX is still the minimum (and at least for me) adequate requirement without having 2 cards in SLI. For people who want the highest graphics quality in VR, the 1080 is recommended, as nVidia has introduced some new technology with specific optimizations for the medium and people who are getting 2 1080's for SLI are just hedging their bets.

However, some people have gotten a 1080 and used their existing 980ti card to specifically handle PhysX processing with success. So at the moment, it's kind of a mixed bag.

I'm sticking with my single 970 until I can save up to get a 1080.
avatar
Doc0075: AMDs new RX 480 is worth checking out, especially if you play in 1920 x 1080 resolution. It costs roughly 200 -250 depending whether you go for the 4GB or 8GB model.
If that is too expensive the RX 470 is due out soon and should be good enough for most games at that resolution.
That's sounds like a cheap price. I don't mind paying more since I don't update very frequently. I've been using a radeon HD 5700 for 5 years or so.
I just upgraded my old GTX 760 to a GTX 1060. If the 3 year old 760 didn't die on me and I didn't want to risk food poisoning roasting the card in the oven, I wouldn't have gotten the 1060 and waited another year or two before upgrading. The 760 is still fine for my gaming needs.
avatar
Elmofongo: Becasue as of now to play the latest games at max graphics while still at 60+ FPS my 970 is not gonna cut it anymore.
avatar
Pheace: What resolution are you playing at? 1920x1080 you should mostly still be fine I'd imagine? Depending on the rest of your rig of course.
I've been finding 1280x720 to be more than sufficient 90% of the time. Maybe my rig is clearly in the lower end of the mid-powered gaming machine, or maybe I've just not been blown away with HD like everyone else.
avatar
Elmofongo: Becasue as of now to play the latest games at max graphics while still at 60+ FPS my 970 is not gonna cut it anymore.

So I am asking this question by asking long time GTX users who upgrades regularly how long does it usually take for Nvdia to reduce the prices on their graphics cards?

I assume they do it the moment they release a new one?

And if so how much is reduced like say the 1070 right now is 400+ dollars, once they release a 1100 or something they cut the price of the older model in half?
I'm looking at the 1060 myself. 250 for what you get is just too good to pass up, and more importantly, I won't have to upgrade my PSU if I went for the 1080.
avatar
Siegor: Interesting thread. I've been meaning to upgrade my own graphics cards but I'm clueless as to what to buy. Are those you mentioned good for someone who doesn't really care for graphics but likes to be able to run the newest games without problems? Any other reccomendations?
avatar
Doc0075: AMDs new RX 480 is worth checking out, especially if you play in 1920 x 1080 resolution. It costs roughly 200 -250 depending whether you go for the 4GB or 8GB model.
If that is too expensive the RX 470 is due out soon and should be good enough for most games at that resolution.
I would honestly say the 1060 is a better bargain. For the same price as the 8 gig 480, you get more power at competitive power consumption.
Post edited August 01, 2016 by LiquidOxygen80
This is a nice little comparison article from Tom's showing relative prices, basic specs and grouping them into display preference categories for review of recent GPU's
Post edited August 02, 2016 by Zoltan999
avatar
Elisebathe: 69 degrees on your CPU, or your GPU? If it is your GPU then no, it is not too hot, in fact you should start worrying only if it gets past 85 degrees, even if the maximum temperature that is specified by Nvidia is 98 degrees, though I would advise not to get to that point, however if it is your CPU then yes, that is too hot. You can check this site what is the maximum temperature your CPU can reach until the BIOS shut down.

http://www.cpu-world.com/index.html
avatar
Elmofongo: Well that is reassuring since I can confirm its GPU temp.

And I disabled the auto shutdown if GPU gets too overheated, I will just stop playing the game after awhile.
Good to hear it. I would recommend to use an program that reads your GPU's temperatures when you play a game that is more demanding, like GPU-Z or other program for your GPU. I would also recommend if your warranty is over to clean your old thermal and put some new thermal paste on your GPU and CPU. If you do not know how, I would either say to get someone who knows, or watch some videos and learn by yourself.
avatar
Siegor: Interesting thread. I've been meaning to upgrade my own graphics cards but I'm clueless as to what to buy. Are those you mentioned good for someone who doesn't really care for graphics but likes to be able to run the newest games without problems? Any other reccomendations?
I'm buying a RX 470 for this purpose. I believe it releases in two days :)