Thanks for the bump
++++++++++++++++
ZFR: They weren't reasons. At. All.
Then my mistake, as imo you
seemedto be suspecting me(at least in part) due to those reasons(lack of RP and hello post).
ZFR: I just mentioned them in parantheses to contrast with what you did this game. The reason I voted you was your reaction to Bookwyrm's RVS and the excuses you made about it later.
As I said, "me being me" often leads to such.
i.e. In cases of more complex thoughts/suspicions that delve into the more complex game aspects/mechanics/etc, I often have a general idea of my thought/suspicion, but sometimes don't know how to state such...so I sometimes "wing it" and try my best.....leading to things like that exchange we had earlier re: bookwyrm's post.
I try to improve as best I can with this, of course(with things like some more note taking when I remember to do so) but some things(like memory issues) are likely near impossible to improve upon.
ZFR: It takes lots of wilful misinterpretation to twist it into "Well they did focus on me for several)3-5, iirc) posts several pages back, with flimsy reasoning like the fact that I didn't start with a hello type post this game & also the fact I didn't roleplay much this game"
Well you did focus on me for several posts awhile back....albeit not with the "flimsy reasoning" I was talking about. To me that seemed a bit odd.
That said(and as you can see): I should've been more clear that those things I listed were more things that appeared to me to be part of your reasoning, that they seemed off/flimsy to me, and that you had other reasons.
(this sort of error on my part is also partly why I will likely be a perpetual newbie in these games)
ZFR: Twisiting someone's reasoning is very scummy. Vote stays.
Fair enough