It's not right. They've got too much in common as players. Narratively it would be dissatisfying for them to be on a team together and I'm hoping the universe has better taste than that.


It's that you tried to follow ZFR's argument how you did. The way he misunderstood you as well has influenced me a bit, which it probably shouldn't do...
but reading up the old games that zfr was referring to and then disagreeing with the argument. That's a special kind of effort.

Why I think only town vitek can do that effort? I don't know. That doesn't really follow does it....


From my POTU (pool of the uneliminated) three are being voted for by others: trent, hunter and catte.
trent's name comes up the most in Gym's list of preferred lunches. I've heard the argument that collecting the data in the way Gym is easily manipulated by the mafia, but I'm up for seeing how this goes

unvote flubbucket
vote trentonlf

I don't play. I've just heard that expression.

So that's currently three Votes for trentonlf's lynch.

If lynched does it tell us anything about ZFR or GymHenson or someone else I'm overlooking??

You can take yourself out if this list. I thought I made that clear.

Depends on how paranoid you are or how much credit you give Trent and ZFR. If Trent is scum I'd say ZFR would be clear as Trent was backing him up a lot which might have been buddying up. Of course, it might have been a way to "buy" into blotunga's wagon without the need of too much explanation on Trent's side but I honestly think that's a stretch and they are better players than that. So probably would make ZFR look good.

Is it not a lynch you approve?

So you're saying the (afaik) standard procedure (get people players suspect to claim range, and change wagons if need be or it seems the best thing to do) is a bad thing? If not then what are you saying?

Also are you suggesting waiting till the last minute than all hurriedly voting and possibly mislynching(like we've done in the past) is a better idea?

No, it wasn't a joke. I don't want to risk a rush to lynch again each game "day" like last game if I can help it.

Also I see your/ZFR'S point somewhat...that said: I am willing to change my playstyle entirely if I find something else that I know/think will benefit the team.....unlike some others (no offense) who don't seem as flexible.

Also also: Sorry for not seeing the reference.....my mind has been busy with IRL and other things online as of late, plus sometimes I have a tendency to not see things staring me smack dab in the face like that.

Also big question: Why have you not posted your top lynch choices? If you're against it, why not tell me "I don't do such" or if you don't have any atm why don't you say "I don't have any/any concrete list atm"?

Why silence and seemingly sidestepping on this?

++++++++

(Boomp needed)

OK, I get what you're saying now. It was more like "The butler can't be the killer because it would make an anticlimatic mystery novel" than "The butler can't be the killer because of evidence X, Y and Z".

Post 447 is what I felt ZFR might be doing....that said, if he is town: why ask him this question & possibly mess with his little "experiment"?

(I mean doctors/etc don't tell the patients in a placebo study what they're taking, now do they? ;))

Well obviously I wanted you to choose from them.....I like playing so much(oh and helping my team as well, of course).

(That said, I wouldn't mind being voted on and/or pushed to claim at some point...for the reasons I stated before and some others...though of course i'd rather we check other players first, as I already know my own alignment)

+++++++++++++++++++++

(Another boomp needed)

Also to ZFR: Lynch candidate list, if you plox.....or at least say "not interested" or "don't have one atm" if either is the case.

Bump it up!

First off, sorry to hear you're so exhausted...hope you feel better/well rested soon enough.

Also sorries for all the posting(like 1/3 or so of the post count seems to be me in these games, so sorry for all the extra text...I am trying to cut back, though, fwiw).

Noice

GH proceeds to check said poster for any clues, including moving around the capital letters to see if they mean anything & putting the words on a board with little red pins and string connecting them, as per how it's usually done.

+++++++++++++++

Also as time is running out, and almost player is viable for me to vote for atm:

Unvote Blotunga

Vote Trent

(Sorry btw trent....I sense how much you dislike some of my tactics such as getting people to claim range, but it's getting near deadline and time is short)

(Everyone else may now feel free to opine on my vote or not......or heck, even cast votes themselves maybe.

Btw again plz note Vitek and ZFR seem to keep sidestepping my call for their top lynch choices, and won't even say "not interested", or "not my thing" or reply in some way to said request....not saying it means they're scum necessarily, but it tis odd)

Yeah. And a bit of "the butler can't be the killer because I doubt I can guess who the killer is just by looking at the picture on the cover of the book".

Vote JoeSapphire.

That's mafia Joe to me. Willing to latch on something with weak reasoning even if he doesn't really suspect the person much.

No. It's that you are going the path of least resistance to get out of peeps what you declared you want since the beginning (get claim out of anyone). Basing it on your lists is silly and you are only doing it to get claim, no other reason.
Also those lists, there are several people who were like "OK, I guess I suspect A, B and if I have to say T I guess" and your list is like, hmm that's vote for A, B and C.

It's not about point of that post at all. It's about how you, not for the first time, manage to completely misreperesent what the other person is saying and answer it in way that doesn't answer it at all.
But don't mind me, I am just passing by.


Can people sum up why the suspect trent?

You know, I think when I'm mafia I tend to find more reasons why we shouldn't be voting for the people I don't really suspect much.

I'd be like "vote trent"
and then 10 minutes later I'd be like "no wait but look! trent said this! unvote trent! wow, being town is hard am I rite guys?"

though the last few games I've been playing process-of-elimination style and I think that changes up things quite a lot. So... maybe? Except no because I'm not.

Wrong. I want us to get the claim out of the one people most suspect. I happen to not know who to suspect atm so I myself am willing to go along with the majority pick.....but I do NOT want people to just get anyone to claim.

The list is to help us build consensus so we can get a wagon going in time so we can have ample time to change course if the person's claim causes people to feel the need to.

Yes, we get a claim out of it, but the primary motivation behind my push is to make sure we have time to react and change course if need be(which i've said several times btw).

Well, that's sorta what I asked for: Whom people would be ok with voting "today"(D1).

Btw I listed the posts so people can read them and see the details behind each player's picks...people are free to go and read them to get the full details.

Like you're doing now with what i'm trying to do "today"(D1)?

Also sort of like how you keep avoiding answering my query on your top viable lynches for today(you could say "I won't do it" or similar, but you do not...why is that I wonder?)?

Dude, we have less than a day afaik till EOD.....yeah, let's waste even more time...not like we have a deadline or anything.

Bess has a few hours of free time, so gets her daily coffee (what, you've never seen a brahmin drink coffee before?, that's the new world baby...) and starts reading what's been written since her absence.


Unvote bucktoothgamer, just incase.
Vote Vitek

He seems to be trying to deflect the attention to a different source, and he also seems ready to "buss" trent, which I believe is a common mafia tactic from what I have read.

Lol, I suddenly felt like I am in a Survivor type of game.