It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Seriously? These votes are based on me recalling the role name incorrectly?

For a false claim, don't you think I would have verified the role name? It is in the first post after all, but i didnt bother to check because I've known my role since the start of the game!

Town roles claimed: vigilante, prankster, gun mule.
Scum roles claimed: conversationalist.

If scum hadn't already voted, I would have expected to be hammered by now. Killing me off and then another town during the break would give them a good chance on day 3, especially with town's only form of protection out of the way.

Saying that, I'll be killed off during the break anyway, so I'd vote trent today, then blotunga tomorrow.
Here's the problem folks...
Someone had to be Jailed...
Since Town is expected to be telling the truth and no one is counter-claimed they have been Jailed, nmillar was jailed.

If nmillar was Jailed, he could not have taken a gun last night. Similarly, if Red could have self protected, Red would not be dead.

I double-checked and do not have any PM from Lift, thus I was not Jailed.
avatar
RWarehall: Here's the problem folks...
Someone had to be Jailed...
Since Town is expected to be telling the truth and no one is counter-claimed they have been Jailed, nmillar was jailed.

If nmillar was Jailed, he could not have taken a gun last night. Similarly, if Red could have self protected, Red would not be dead.

I double-checked and do not have any PM from Lift, thus I was not Jailed.
I agree with this line of reasoning. Scum couldn't have been jailed since a NK happened. I wasn't, you wasn't and nmillar is the only one who claims he was.
@Gamerager thoughts? Were you by chance prankstered?
@Rwarehall: odds that trent is scum?

unvote nmillar
avatar
nmillar: Seriously? These votes are based on me recalling the role name incorrectly?

For a false claim, don't you think I would have verified the role name? It is in the first post after all, but i didnt bother to check because I've known my role since the start of the game!

Town roles claimed: vigilante, prankster, gun mule.
Scum roles claimed: conversationalist.

If scum hadn't already voted, I would have expected to be hammered by now. Killing me off and then another town during the break would give them a good chance on day 3, especially with town's only form of protection out of the way.

Saying that, I'll be killed off during the break anyway, so I'd vote trent today, then blotunga tomorrow.
Who else was trying to paint RedFireGaming as scum on Day 2, oh yeah your buddy SPF. That being said, why would you still suspect RedFireGaming once SPF flipped scum?
avatar
nmillar: Seriously? These votes are based on me recalling the role name incorrectly?

For a false claim, don't you think I would have verified the role name? It is in the first post after all, but i didnt bother to check because I've known my role since the start of the game!

Town roles claimed: vigilante, prankster, gun mule.
Scum roles claimed: conversationalist.

If scum hadn't already voted, I would have expected to be hammered by now. Killing me off and then another town during the break would give them a good chance on day 3, especially with town's only form of protection out of the way.

Saying that, I'll be killed off during the break anyway, so I'd vote trent today, then blotunga tomorrow.
avatar
trentonlf: Who else was trying to paint RedFireGaming as scum on Day 2, oh yeah your buddy SPF. That being said, why would you still suspect RedFireGaming once SPF flipped scum?
1. Why would SPF flipping scum have any bearing on RedFireGaming's alignment? The original post clearly states that the prankster can be either town or scum. Obviously we now know it was a town role, but there was no way to confirm this until he flipped.

2. I note that you weren't directly asked, but do you want to put in a claim of being role blocked?
When was the deadline again? I want to hear more about Gamerager's thoughts.
avatar
trentonlf: Who else was trying to paint RedFireGaming as scum on Day 2, oh yeah your buddy SPF. That being said, why would you still suspect RedFireGaming once SPF flipped scum?
avatar
nmillar: 1. Why would SPF flipping scum have any bearing on RedFireGaming's alignment? The original post clearly states that the prankster can be either town or scum. Obviously we now know it was a town role, but there was no way to confirm this until he flipped.

2. I note that you weren't directly asked, but do you want to put in a claim of being role blocked?
1) Because the only reason RedFireGaming would have been on SPF’s wagon so early was to bus him if they were both scum, and when he put his vote on him busing him made no sense as SPF wasn’t really under a lot of pressure at that time. The likelihood of RedFireGaming being SPF’s scum buddy was extremely low, and he was the most obvious choice for scum to target as the night kill since he could jail them.

2) I was not roleblocked last night, if I was I would have mentioned it already.
avatar
blotunga: When was the deadline again? I want to hear more about Gamerager's thoughts.
“Deadline is Tuesday evening or Wednesday morning”
avatar
nmillar: 1. Why would SPF flipping scum have any bearing on RedFireGaming's alignment? The original post clearly states that the prankster can be either town or scum. Obviously we now know it was a town role, but there was no way to confirm this until he flipped.

2. I note that you weren't directly asked, but do you want to put in a claim of being role blocked?
avatar
trentonlf: 1) Because the only reason RedFireGaming would have been on SPF’s wagon so early was to bus him if they were both scum, and when he put his vote on him busing him made no sense as SPF wasn’t really under a lot of pressure at that time. The likelihood of RedFireGaming being SPF’s scum buddy was extremely low, and he was the most obvious choice for scum to target as the night kill since he could jail them.

2) I was not roleblocked last night, if I was I would have mentioned it already.
Then I assume when GameRager also confirms he wasn't role blocked, then you have to acknowledge that I'm telling the truth? As RWarehall pointed out already, if I was jailed, I could not have carried out the kill?
avatar
nmillar: Then I assume when GameRager also confirms he wasn't role blocked, then you have to acknowledge that I'm telling the truth? As RWarehall pointed out already, if I was jailed, I could not have carried out the kill?
If no one counter claims being jailed N2 I will absolutely agree that you could not have done the kill.
Another GameRager Proxy Post
(I'm on a mobile at the moment, so I won't quote, but leave the instructions where to vote which post as they were sent to me via PM. Please look up the quoted posts yourself)

Start of GRPP:
---------------------------------------
Hmm, more posts.....not many, but enough to work with(based on content).

As for blotunga: His vote on me in post#355 seems a tad suspicious after I made my suspicions on him known earlier, but is likely more OMGUS. I'd still like his reasoning for it, though, and also his leanings with regards to nmillar.


As for posts 356-360: Was Nmillar just mistyping the role name by accident? Are blotunga and trent piling on him too quickly and/or one of them a possible pacifist?

Trent/Blotunga.....both your possible reasons behind being suspicious of nmillar & your(blotunga's) prior vote on same being explained would be nice.

((quote post 261's last two sections))

You make some good points(which I snipped to save space), and as for this last bit: It seems(if your claim is true) that you are less viable to vote for, then.

As for your possible voting: Why trent over blotunga?

((quote post 363's line "@Gamerager thoughts? Were you by chance prankstered?"))

I wasn't that I am aware of, so no. Also I note you dropped your vote....any reason why you did so so readily?

===================================

Well I see NMillar's role claim(if valid) to be a reason not to vote for them, and I don't know who else to vote for besides blotunga....so

Aim at blotunga

for now until I see his replies and everyone else's.

------------------------------
End of the most recent GRPP
Unvote nmillar
avatar
RWarehall: ....
Who do you think is scum?
Just a short input. Today is family time so I won't be long online. I think that if I believe nmillar's claim, then GameRager is likely scum. Btw a but of wifom about who might be doubting me. If you were scum and would have a PR and a goon, which would execute the NK. Thus I think I can rule myself out as SPF's scumbuddy. I will check back tomorrow with a bit of recap, when I have time.
avatar
blotunga: Just a short input. Today is family time so I won't be long online. I think that if I believe nmillar's claim, then GameRager is likely scum. Btw a but of wifom about who might be doubting me. If you were scum and would have a PR and a goon, which would execute the NK. Thus I think I can rule myself out as SPF's scumbuddy. I will check back tomorrow with a bit of recap, when I have time.
I tend to agree with this. For me, it is between trent and GameRager for the scum role, and a potential very well played Serial Killer played by RWarehall.
Are we all assuming that there's only 1 scum left? If that's the case then the setup is:

7 town
2 scum
1 neutral

I'm no expert on how balanced that would be as a setup, especially as I haven't played for a few years, so does that seem reasonable?

Other floated possibilities are:

6 town
3 scum
1 neutral

Or even:

6 town
2 scum
2 neutral (including one serial killer)

The earlier mod post stated, "at least one more".