It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
flubbucket: So help me understand what you're using to deduce a target.

*pokes Lifthrasil's lifeless body*
avatar
HypersomniacLive: *drags flubbucket to tentonlf's lifeless body*

And adaliabooks continues to avoid engaging in discussion...
I did mean to ask - were you ultimately satisfied by mchack's answers? And how are you reading him right now?
avatar
flubbucket: So help me understand what you're using to deduce a target.

*pokes Lifthrasil's lifeless body*
avatar
HypersomniacLive: *drags flubbucket to tentonlf's lifeless body*

And adaliabooks continues to avoid engaging in discussion...
I don't know what you're talking about.

Look, over there!
A badger with a gun!
Shoot Badger
avatar
flubbucket: Shoot Badger
*Illegal move!*
avatar
bler144: I did mean to ask - were you ultimately satisfied by mchack's answers? And how are you reading him right now?
I'm rather surprised you have to ask.



avatar
adaliabooks: I don't know what you're talking about.

Look, over there!
A badger with a gun!
Go on.
Look Sternly At Badger
avatar
bler144: I did mean to ask - were you ultimately satisfied by mchack's answers? And how are you reading him right now?
avatar
HypersomniacLive: I'm rather surprised you have to ask.
Uhhh...I just re-read to see what I'm missing as I'm...surprised you're surprised. You mention your suspicion in #68, and then don't really appear to address him again.

In #122 you ask wyrm why he targets mchack.
in #128 you respond to mchack about a voting technicality

I don't see anything else.

Are you assuming I should know just because you haven't shot (at) him in the 1 shot you've taken since then?
avatar
flubbucket: Look Sternly At Badger
*click*
*yawn* Did you know that the highly sought after "Lucky Bastard Award" is still tied between bookwyrm and flub? both surviving 4 shots... wonder who gets it in the end.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Go on.
Look, what do you expect?

There have been two scum deaths, unfortunately neither of them said or did a single thing in game or were targeted by any other players and the shots that killed them were taken by the mod.
Therefore we can read absolutely nothing into them. Everyone else has killed town, and considering about half of us (rough guess as I can't be bothered to check) half killed someone we can't all be scum.

So we keep shooting people on whatever suspicion we can muster until we've hit scum.

I kind of like bler's reasoning, I could see Bookwyrm being the last scum.

Equally I could see flub playing us (if he killed himself then it's game over, if not he looks reasonably townie for taking the risk).

Or you could be scum. Your push on Lift (and someone else.. mchack?) at the start of the game seemed contrived.

I could be scum, let's face it it's basically a 90% chance these days whatever ZFR will say about statistics.


So we just keep shooting.. nothing else to it, until someone does something to arouse actual suspicion.

If we wanted to do this properly then nobody should be allowed to shoot until we all pick a target, then we take it in turns to shoot until they are dead. Anyone deviating from that plan is shot too as scum.
But with one scum left that doesn't really work either as they no longer have anyone else to worry about shooting or protecting.


How was that?
avatar
adaliabooks: Equally I could see flub playing us (if he killed himself then it's game over, if not he looks reasonably townie for taking the risk).
I actually gave him more credit for his joke @ HSL. Sharp, no defensiveness shows he's still trying when scum!flub really wouldn't have much motive to.
avatar
bler144: Uhhh...I just re-read to see what I'm missing as I'm...surprised you're surprised. You mention your suspicion in #68, and then don't really appear to address him again.

In #122 you ask wyrm why he targets mchack.
in #128 you respond to mchack about a voting technicality

I don't see anything else.

Are you assuming I should know just because you haven't shot (at) him in the 1 shot you've taken since then?
No, you should know because I didn't address him again when he's made a number of actual posts.



avatar
adaliabooks: Look, what do you expect? [...] How was that?
Not sure if you're annoyed that I tried to get you to talk.


I"m off to bed, so I'll take my turn as to not stall the game while I'm asleep.

Shoot Bookwyrm627
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Shoot Bookwyrm627
*click*
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Not sure if you're annoyed that I tried to get you to talk.
No, you should know I'm not annoyed because I didn't shoot you again.


;)




Yet.
avatar
mchack: .... wonder who gets it in the end.
If enough tequila is consumed I guess we could try it......once.