Well, thanks for the comments guys, I'm glad the debate got some traction.
I want to add some clarifications.
First, funny how triggered someones were with the GNU/Linux use, jajaja, well, I'm and old timer huge GNU fan so it sticks with me...
Second, I'm glad GOG exist and was a big fan but to me GNU/Linux support if THE most important issue when I get soft or hard, I know GNU/Linux market is not huge but that's because the support is limited, and that's because the Redmond lobby thought the ages. I believe it can change, but as always, we the consumers must demand it. If we dont care, they dont care.
Third, I really "feel" Steam support is better, not only for the native client working exactly the same in any platform, but also for all the work Steam itself is putting in to make their library compatible. If you follow some of the GNU/Linux gaming forums/news you can, like every day, find some news about Valve and some contribution to the kernel, the drivers, the wine code, some of their own devs working here and there to that goal.
Their close work with Code weavers to get Proton improve also help Wine, with in the side benefits all the GNU/Linux community. You don't want Steam, fine, you can use Wine or Lutris (with Wine) to use GOG games on GNU/Linux. That gaming improvement, in a small portion, is push by Valve's involve in get their library compatible.
https://www.codeweavers.com/about/blogs/aeikum/2019/8/20/a-year-since-protons-launch https://www.gamingonlinux.com/articles/codeweavers-on-how-proton-steam-play-helped-improve-wine-42.13845 I'm not even asking GOG to make such and effort. I only asked for a native Galaxy client. They don't even care about that. That's why I'm disappointed with the platform. I still think they are great with their DRM free policy and their games, (CDPR games) are gold, so I will still buy those games (in Steam), but the platform, GOG, not.
But that's me. Thanks for all the comments and the good vibe. I really like this community.