It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Swedrami: As per the last half of this thread Selaco was turned down via an automated reply system GoG had (still has?) in place at that time, to ease the workload for their relatively small staff or something. Allegedly the amount of submissions they receive is actually higher than you'd expect, so they inevitably have to pass up on a fair amount of titles without evaluating them beforehand. Again, allegedly.
If this was / is the case, GOG could simply contact those who have submitted that either wait times would be extended... or that they may want to resubmit in a few months (just in case of a submission being "lost in the shuffle"). But IMO a blanket rejection due to a clogged review system is...

... ABSOLUTE INSANITY. Blanket rejections? Devs claiming uncertainty in why they were rejected? Re-submitting multiple times? Many months for replies?

I really do value what GOG puts forth (catalogue) -- and have had good interactions with them -- but everytime I hear more about their business practices, GOG feels more-and-more misguided and unprofessional. I sincerely hope these stories are second hand and not how GOG actually works internally. If they are -- from the outside -- I fear GOG is sabotaging its own success.

Aside...

... I do have the distinct feeling through the years that GOG is so single-mindedly chasing a CDPR exclusives strategy (which they haven't gotten to work yet) as their key to success, that they've forgotten the road to success is paved one stone at a time. IMHO creating a fast and efficient submission / review environment for devs (especially indie devs) is one of the first and most necessary stones in the road to success.

Certainly hope the situation internally at GOG isn't what it looks like from the outside (this may very well be the case). If it is, they really need some training in building a successful customer-oriented business.

C'mon GOG, pulling for ya!
Lucy Dreaming, an oldschool point & click adventure scheduled to be released on 18th October, was turned down.

https://twitter.com/tallstorygames/status/1573585297668988929

The developers ask nicely to add your vote to the community wishlist to show GOG that there's a demand for this game:

https://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/lucy_dreaming
I have only briefly looked at a handful of titles on this list and that is already enough to piss me off considering the porno-games they are peddling now. What the actual fuck?
avatar
SonOfAThief: Lucy Dreaming, an oldschool point & click adventure scheduled to be released on 18th October, was turned down.

https://twitter.com/tallstorygames/status/1573585297668988929

The developers ask nicely to add your vote to the community wishlist to show GOG that there's a demand for this game:

https://www.gog.com/wishlist/games/lucy_dreaming
Well, we got that one some time ago, so off the list it goes :)

But you can add BadAss Babes. The dev said he applied, but got rejected.
Post edited March 06, 2023 by neumi5694
The Wardrobe, according to https://www.gog.com/forum/general/the_wardrobe_cinic_games_available_on_gog/post4
Wow, this list is frustrating to say the least. Lots of games I'd love to play on Gog...
Post edited January 17, 2024 by Andre8000