Posted February 10, 2017
Hunter65536: If I had seen what Hijack would post now back when I voted on him, I'd still call for a lynch is what I'd like to say in conclusion. (Top pick) I guess trent agrees with my philosophy for lynching inactive players from next game, must be my game improving. :)
Not only trent agrees to lynching inactive players. Usually I am also in favour of lynching all lurkers ... but at LyLo we can't afford to let that be the only lynching reason. In a normal play the argument brought by someone against Sage has some validity. Even if a lurker turns out to be town, it still removes an otherwise hardly solvable unknown from the game, since someone who lurks isn't readable. But at lylo it's game over, should the lurker turn out to be town. Therefor your push for lynching HijacK based purely on his absence looked scummy to me. Talking about possible scum. I don't see Hunter and HijacK as cooperating. So I guess if one of them is scum, the other is town. Unfortunately I still see both as possible scum candidates. Nacho is a bit back and forth for me. Sometimes he appears scummy, sometimes, like in his last post, rather towny. Of course everyone could be scum, but at the moment he feels less scummy than Hunter or HijacK. Trent, as I detailed, might have been converted tonight and I see it as quite possible, that CL-HijacK is using him. Either as bus-victim or as mis-lynch-push.
So, at the moment my lynch candidates would be, in order of preference, HijacK, Hunter and trent (if all else fails). I definitely won't lynch dedo or myself.
And to get things moving, I vote according to my preference:
vote HijacK