It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Hickory: It doesn't answer the question: it is irrelevant.
If by "relevant" you mean "conclusive", then you are correct. As it stands, that doe not fit any definition of "relevant" that I am familiar with.
avatar
Hickory: It doesn't answer the question: it is irrelevant.
avatar
Jonesy89: If by "relevant" you mean "conclusive", then you are correct. As it stands, that doe not fit any definition of "relevant" that I am familiar with.
To answer a question the reply must be conclusive, otherwise it's supposition. It is irrelevant.
avatar
Hickory: To answer a question the reply must be conclusive, otherwise it's supposition. It is irrelevant.
I disagree; perfect conclusiveness (i.e. the response tells you with 100% certainty that one version of the game is preferable) would be ideal, but some level of probative value of the supplied data is still responsive to the question and provides an idea as to how the consumer will react upon purchase.
avatar
Hickory: To answer a question the reply must be conclusive, otherwise it's supposition. It is irrelevant.
avatar
Jonesy89: I disagree; perfect conclusiveness (i.e. the response tells you with 100% certainty that one version of the game is preferable) would be ideal, but some level of probative value of the supplied data is still responsive to the question and provides an idea as to how the consumer will react upon purchase.
Spoken like a lawyer. :)

Maybe it's the question at fault, at least in my eyes: if a question asks 'what's best?', you will get this kind of response from me. But if it asks 'what differences can I expect?', then my response would be entirely different: I tend to deal in absolutes with regard to queries.

Let's just agree to disagree and move on, eh?
avatar
Hickory: Spoken like a lawyer. :)
I'm feeling tired, so I'll try to take that as a compliment and assume that no ad hominem was intended.
avatar
Hickory: Spoken like a lawyer. :)
avatar
Jonesy89: I'm feeling tired, so I'll try to take that as a compliment and assume that no ad hominem was intended.
It was an observation, nothing more. Take that as you will.