Hi everyone, I wanted to know if there's some place where I could get info on whats best BG EE or GOG version with all the mods and what do I miss if I play one or the other.

Also a list of must have mods for the BG saga and Icewind Dale Saga.

Thanks in advance.

What's best depends entirely on you. You, and nobody else. Try them; don't rely on third party information.

There is no such thing as 'must have'. See above.

And taking other peoples' advice guarantees nothing; less than nothing. You could spend one amount (whichever), not like what you see and say 'to hell with that', and end up never trying the other/s. It's just silly relying on other people to determine if you will prefer one over another.

It's not a perfect guarantee that the person will have a perfectly flawless conclusion of whether or not they will like it, but it provides far more data to the ends of predicting the desirability of playing it than purchasing without having conducted any prior inquiry.

With regards to OP, pi4t's links have covered the subject in great detail, so they should prove to be a helpful resource.

I disagree. It only provides flawed data. And flawed data is the same as no data.

I'm not sure how you arrive at this conclusion. Not doing research prior to purchase is akin to failing to do research before making any other commitment of time and energy to something without any investigation. Let's take books, for instance. I could read every single book that comes up on my radar, but given that my GoodReads to-read shelf is in excess of 200, it would be a massive waste of time and money if I were to start buying them without determining their gnere, their style of writing, whether they are pretentious or not, whether they are genre fiction, and if so, how do they stack up, and any number of factors that affect whether or not the book is my cup of tea. By doing research into the specific things that made people like or dislike the book, not their mere conclusions, I can better determine if, say, the copy of 50 Shades of Grey is decent erotica or an insultingly awful bit of vomiting through a pen that I should avoid. Granted, it's not a foolproof process, as there is always the possibility of everyone not addressing a particular facet of the book or otherwise failing to understand it, but that's a concern that is almost nil nowadays what with the internet expanding the amount of data to analyze astronomically. That's not to say that by doing research my opinion about the book after I have read it magically changes due to doing research beforehand; rather, I am better able to predict what my reaction to the book will be like before I have sunk in valuable time on a bad book.

tl;dr: just replace the relevant bits below with any given game, and I think you can see my point

Subject: Dracula the Undead

Option1: no research
Estimated probability of not liking the book: I dunno
Estimated probability of liking the book: I dunno
Amount of time spent reading book: Had to spend fair amount of time to read a good portion if not the entirety in order to determine if the book was at all worthwhile; what can I say, there is always the possibility the ending redeems it, and I don't know if it does because I didn't do research (granted, I could do it now, but why didn't I do it before investing this much time and possibly money?)

Option 2: research
Estimated probability of not liking the book: Dacre Stoker did little to nothing in the way of actual writing? Ian Holt previously wrote for direct to DVD action films? This smells like a blatant cash grab, and from what I can gather the plot is a mess that pisses on the original's continuity and has all the artistry of a boot to the head as conceived of by the studio that does Disney sequels, serving only to confirm this; the odds of suckage are off the charts
Estimated probability of liking the book: HELL no

End result either way: WHAT IS THIS I DON'T EVEN

Well said. After all, I think we can all agree that the BG series is one of the best series of games made? Yet I'd never have discovered it if it hadn't been recommended to me by some people on another forum. Without looking at others' responses and thoughts on the game, there's nothing to distinguish BG from all the poor quality RPGs that pop up regularly on Steam. Information from neutral sources, including other players of the game, is one of the best ways to find out whether you'll appreciate a game or not, especially since the publishers' information about their games is designed to get you to buy it.

Now now, don't go putting words in my mouth; my posts regarding BG elsewhere go against any indication that I think it is one of the best series of games made. It just so happens that the things I hate about the series are either, as I have stated elsewhere, that people seem to love or not mind for reasons that are beyond me.

My apologies: I assumed that since you had enough interest to post here, you probably did like the game. My remarks were mainly addressed to HIckory, anyway (who I've seen use words to the effect of what I said).

No, I can't. All that mumbo-jumbo is irrelevant when the question asked is 'what is best'.

Eh, I might not care for it, but that's no reason to not provide something in the way of useful aid in relation to it.

It is relevant insofar as it can help a consumer determine which is more likely to appeal to them without investing money and time into both of them. It'd be like me buying and reading both versions of Stephen King's The Gunslinger; a massive waste of time and money that could have avoided by doing preliminary research.

There are objective as well as subjective judgments that can be made about BG:EE. It costs more, uses activate-on-install DRM and isn't compatible with many existing mods for BG.

Issues like the quality of the new content, design of the UI or look of the new cutscenes are subjective in nature. However the fact that opinion is polarised on these should be a good indication that Beamdog could have done better.