Posted on: June 20, 2025

AmirGame024
Games: 32 Reviews: 29
Good Game
I also like this game of Prince of Persia.
Is this helpful to you?
© 2005 Ubisoft® Entertainment. Based on Prince of Persia® created by Jordan Mechner. All Rights Reserved. Ubisoft and the Ubisoft logo are trademarks of Ubisoft Entertainment in the U.S. and/or other countries. Prince of Persia® and Prince of Persia The Two Thrones® are trademarks of Jordan Mechner used under license by Ubisoft Entertainment.
Please be advised that Windows 10 operating system will receive frequent hardware driver and software updates following its release; this may affect game compatibility
Please be advised that Windows 10 operating system will receive frequent hardware driver and software updates following its release; this may affect game compatibility
Game length provided by HowLongToBeat
Posted on: June 20, 2025
AmirGame024
Games: 32 Reviews: 29
Good Game
I also like this game of Prince of Persia.
Is this helpful to you?
Posted on: July 12, 2025
DADNDH
Verified ownerGames: 101 Reviews: 2
Dissapointing
Had very high expectation since I´ve played this game on my childhood and loved it. But I couldn´t pass the first 5 minutes of the game without crashing and havig compatibility issues.
Is this helpful to you?
Posted on: April 8, 2022
johnny_mcl
Verified ownerGames: 35 Reviews: 9
Janky but still enjoyable
You thought Warrior Within had a bad story? now its double worse. The gameplay is somewhat samey, decent audio and music, but graphics are worse.
Is this helpful to you?
Posted on: May 15, 2025
Fen_X490
Games: 204 Reviews: 1
The worst part of the series
The game may now be valued as a classic, but the game itself is the worst part of the series, where its creators did everything to ruin it. If it were up to me, I would make a remake of this part and so that it would be the one that should have been, that's all thanks for my unnecessary opinion.
Is this helpful to you?
Posted on: April 12, 2021
polysquirrel
Verified ownerGames: 274 Reviews: 28
If it ain't broken, don't fix it
Sands of Time had a strong identity: Arabian Nights theme, great platforming with traps, crowd fights, unique moves and an innovative time rewind mechanic tied to the plot. The only real weak spot were boring fights, reminiscent of mobile games. Warrior Within improved everything: it introduced many new attacks, it had a really good story, and easily one of the best level design of any platformer ever. The game would have been perfect if not for cringy character design, as if from a young teenager's wet dream. All that The Two Thrones had to do to become the best platformer of all times was to take the formula of the last game and move back to the fairy tale aesthetic. Ubisoft had everything in place to make the best 3D platformer of all times. And they kind of did, but also tried to, unnecessarily for a still short series, change things. They added quick time events and boring cart race levels. They also made the game much easier: there are hardly any traps, let alone long corridors of death, the platforming offers no challange - there is never any doubt where to go the jumps are automatic (as they were before) and no gauging distance or careful timing is necessary, resulting in a mediocre game. All in all, I'd give the game 3 stars, if not for a single boss fight, which was my most frustrating experience in all gaming. As in most such games, movement is relative to your opponent, not absolute, which always makes fights with multiple enemies tricky when you must land a couple hundered of hits and can take only ten. Worst of all, there is no manual targeting mode, while the whole idea behind the fight is a need to quickly switch targets at the right moments (you can't slow the time). To add insult to injury, automatic targetting is very wonky: sometimes you stand face to face with one opponent, but attacking makes the prince do three back flips and try to hit a monster behind him; sometimes the target switches to a monster after it attacks you, sometimes not.
Is this helpful to you?
Something went wrong. Try refresh page.
No reviews matching your criteria