mobutu: hopefully there may be no ea in the future
Agreed completely. EA ceased to be useful when they stopped putting their new games on GOG and Steam, instead hoarding them on their sorry excuse off a platform named Origin and making all of their modern premium/"AAA" games Origin exclusive as a justification for its pitiful existence.
If Activision and Ubisoft move to streamed-only games, I'm predicting they will lock the stream to 30 fps (for a cinematic experience, whatever that means). Found the new Activision "Ninja Turtles" game in my Steam discovery queue and the reviews were littered with rage posts about being locked to 30 fps.
---------------------
AnimalMother117: I would say that no one will want to play a Battlefield 6
No one needs yet another team vs team realistic modern war simulator. Those are more overdone than a burnt steak.
-----------------------
Emob78: ...a Nanny bot can assist you. Just remember that if you resist,...
the Coalition will remotely disable your nano-implants and you will no longer be able to experience virtual reality until you make a detour to Hong Kong and get them reactivated.
Stuff like that is why the original Deus Ex should be mandatory literature study.
-----------------------
clarry: It's feasible in theory, but in practice the internet connectivity around the world is just too spotty and unreliable for a good experience across the board.
They could always lock the resolution and frame rate to a very cinematic (whatever that means) 400x300/20fps.
----------------
Trilarion: The whole game logic will probably be server-based. The graphics effects... generate them on the client side
So it's a s***ty 1-player MMO. That already exists, it's called Diablo 3.
----------------
It's time for people to boycott Electronic Assholes, Ubi$**t, and similar control freak companies until they go out of business.
Also: even if the megacorporations make everything stream-only, there will always be plenty of indie devs who wouldn't.