It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
darthspudius: Tell me again guys... go on... just one more time... :P

Edit: Amazes me after all this time that people still don't have a sense of humour. *shakes head* There is no hope, none at all! You blew it all up!!!! Damn you!!!
Bethesda doesn't need DRM in the age of Steam Workshop, honestly. Their sales are assured. As far as their old IPs, it's in their best interest to get them on as many distribution services as possible.
avatar
gooberking: I think it just comes down to...
avatar
Crosmando: Modern Bethsoft releases like Skyrim and NV are built upon Steam, as Fallout 4 will surely be as well.

It's like saying Electronic Arts or Ubisoft are fine with DRM-free because they dump their old games on GOG. No, because all their new releases have their own DRM on them.
avatar
synfresh: This comes up everytime a new publisher is here and yet I have yet to see one of these publishers (Square, Paradox, WB, Beth) release a new game here. WB has been here how long, where is Shadow of Mordor? Paradox has been here how long, where is Cities: Skylines? I'll buy that these guys are full DRM-Free when they release games where they have to strip out steamworks or some other form of DRM to put it on here.

Maybe, just maybe these publishers view GoG as Good Old Games, a store that specializes in classic games (you can make the argument Morrowind is old enough to be a classic) instead of a equal footing competitor to Steam.
All good points. As much as it's nice to see the old classics on GoG it's hyperbolic to say these companies are moving away from supporting DRM - obviously they still do. It's a bit of Cinderella-thinking to believe the carriage is not a pumpkin.

(On a side note Paradox has no plans of going DRM free for Cities: Skylines according to their people - Steam is where it lives for the foreseeable future.)

What's interesting to me is the way game companies consciously or unconsciously (probably unconsciously) have rejected the windowed business model Hollywood follows. Hollywood makes a product, it goes to theater at top dollar prices, then VOD, then DVD/Bluray, and finally cable and Netflix. Each window contributes to recovering investment and turning a profit over the approximate 3-5yr lifecycle of a film. Game companies already discount heavily after 6-12months of a game's release but apparently don't see the 6-12month mark as a new opportunity to market a DRM free version. At that point anyone who wanted to steal the game already has meanwhile paying customers wanting DRM free versions simply get left out in the cold.
Post edited August 27, 2015 by xSinghx
avatar
darthspudius: Tell me again guys... go on... just one more time... :P

Edit: Amazes me after all this time that people still don't have a sense of humour. *shakes head* There is no hope, none at all! You blew it all up!!!! Damn you!!!
avatar
metaslugx: Bethesda doesn't need DRM in the age of Steam Workshop, honestly. Their sales are assured. As far as their old IPs, it's in their best interest to get them on as many distribution services as possible.
Steam Workshop, when used as Valve intend IS DRM. It chooses when the game lunches or not. Thats DRM.
Has anyone noticed that this thread which was started as a joke has actually turned into a serious debate? Seriously guys, let it go!
avatar
mechmouse: DRM is not executable verification, nor is it account validation.
<snip>
Steam is not DRM, it is a delivery system. Steamworks has DRM capabilities.
Not to disagree with you, but i sorta think of it more like a Swiss Army Knife. The Swiss Army Knife has a knife... and a can opener, a screw driver, scissors, etc, none of which are by themselves the Swiss Army Knife. But once they've been added to the package, you can't say 'The Swiss Army Knife is just a knife' anymore, because you KNOW it has other features to it, and those features can't be discounted from it's namesake since they've been there so long.

Since DRM is a main feature (although not it's only feature), DRM is in fact part of the package, whether it's utilized, or not. Look at two games side by side, one has DRM and one doesn't, both bought on steam... Even if it clearly labels if it uses DRM in the description, it's not easy to separate even at a glance and it's in fact much easier to assume there's DRM than not.


Heh... you know... i look at my Leatherman i bought while i was in the army, and it has a ton of tools on it. Only recently did i learn what the awl was (or even how to use it). Most Leathermans include an awl to my knowledge, along with a few knifes and several every day tools. Learned how to use the Awl, and it's great feature/tool! But the leather-man (like the Swiss Army Knife and Steam) is the entire product; It may not be useless to never have/use some of those features, but you can't really discount that they are in fact there.

Unlike a tool which you can modify and remove a useless feature or replace it, you can't just clip off the big can opener labeled DRM because you'll never get or use canned items, it's there... and it's not your choice.

But this half rant isn't really important, just a side thought... a view from another angle.
avatar
mechmouse: DRM is not executable verification, nor is it account validation.
<snip>
Steam is not DRM, it is a delivery system. Steamworks has DRM capabilities.
avatar
rtcvb32: Not to disagree with you, but i sorta think of it more like a Swiss Army Knife. The Swiss Army Knife has a knife... and a can opener, a screw driver, scissors, etc, none of which are by themselves the Swiss Army Knife. But once they've been added to the package, you can't say 'The Swiss Army Knife is just a knife' anymore, because you KNOW it has other features to it, and those features can't be discounted from it's namesake since they've been there so long.

Since DRM is a main feature (although not it's only feature), DRM is in fact part of the package, whether it's utilized, or not. Look at two games side by side, one has DRM and one doesn't, both bought on steam... Even if it clearly labels if it uses DRM in the description, it's not easy to separate even at a glance and it's in fact much easier to assume there's DRM than not.

Heh... you know... i look at my Leatherman i bought while i was in the army, and it has a ton of tools on it. Only recently did i learn what the awl was (or even how to use it). Most Leathermans include an awl to my knowledge, along with a few knifes and several every day tools. Learned how to use the Awl, and it's great feature/tool! But the leather-man (like the Swiss Army Knife and Steam) is the entire product; It may not be useless to never have/use some of those features, but you can't really discount that they are in fact there.

Unlike a tool which you can modify and remove a useless feature or replace it, you can't just clip off the big can opener labeled DRM because you'll never get or use canned items, it's there... and it's not your choice.

But this half rant isn't really important, just a side thought... a view from another angle.
I have to say, that was a very well written post. A fairly unique comparison, well done. :P
avatar
darthspudius: I have to say, that was a very well written post. A fairly unique comparison, well done. :P
I mostly just let my hands type what i was thinking, then revised it before finally posting it.

I'm not calling death to DRM (although i have in the past when i had a lot more pent up anger), and i'm not trying to spread hate for Valve; But the big wart/troll that seems to give us so much trouble is there while the potential of it not being used i constantly see as debunks for if 'Steam is DRM' or not because somehow Steamworks (that requires Steam) makes Steam not DRM.

This makes me scratch my head, It's like saying a truck is still a truck if you take away all the wheels. In theory they are technically correct, but there's too many obvious cases where you don't run the truck without wheels (or steam without steamworks/DRM).

I guess i want everyone to agree to a point of view and move on, so only the trolls will troll eachother... maybe then, they will finally go away...
avatar
darthspudius: I have to say, that was a very well written post. A fairly unique comparison, well done. :P
avatar
rtcvb32: I mostly just let my hands type what i was thinking, then revised it before finally posting it.

I'm not calling death to DRM (although i have in the past when i had a lot more pent up anger), and i'm not trying to spread hate for Valve; But the big wart/troll that seems to give us so much trouble is there while the potential of it not being used i constantly see as debunks for if 'Steam is DRM' or not because somehow Steamworks (that requires Steam) makes Steam not DRM.

This makes me scratch my head, It's like saying a truck is still a truck if you take away all the wheels. In theory they are technically correct, but there's too many obvious cases where you don't run the truck without wheels (or steam without steamworks/DRM).

I guess i want everyone to agree to a point of view and move on, so only the trolls will troll eachother... maybe then, they will finally go away...
Moving on is something this lot does not do.
avatar
darthspudius: Moving on is something this lot does not do.
Sorry :(
avatar
darthspudius: Oh just admit you were wrong. The lot of you were, nothing wrong with admitting it! :D
There is finality to wrongness. Admittance means the chase is over, and the journey that has honed your beliefs comes to an end. For what would you be without the naysayers, the pessimists, and the detractors? For who now is your father if not me? I am the well spring, from which you flow. When I am gone, you will have never been. What would your world be, without me, my son?
avatar
darthspudius: Oh just admit you were wrong. The lot of you were, nothing wrong with admitting it! :D
avatar
markrichardb: There is finality to wrongness. Admittance means the chase is over, and the journey that has honed your beliefs comes to an end. For what would you be without the naysayers, the pessimists, and the detractors? For who now is your father if not me? I am the well spring, from which you flow. When I am gone, you will have never been. What would your world be, without me, my son?
Happier? ;)
avatar
darthspudius: Moving on is something this lot does not do.
avatar
rtcvb32: Sorry :(
and so you should be! :P
Post edited August 27, 2015 by darthspudius
I do hope they do release more current titles.

If titles were released 2 years later sans DRM, i'd happly wait until then to buy them. Mind you not at original RRP though.
avatar
Enebias: First I want to see some games that previously had DRM released here. Then I'll change my mind.
So far, all the released games have already had a DRM-free version, and not selling them here would have just been a commercial nonsense.

Edit- I'll give you this, though: they are not as unreasonable as I thought, so who knows.
Yes they are. Cut them no slack. Like you said, until they release previous games that have DRM without said DRM, they haven't done anything that hasn't already happened.
avatar
kblazer883: Yes they are. Cut them no slack. Like you said, until they release previous games that have DRM without said DRM, they haven't done anything that hasn't already happened.
Patience young padawan. Those will come as well.
avatar
mechmouse: Enough sales, may convince them to release something newer. but thats just a hope.
avatar
rtcvb32: Maybe... But the prices they've set for the games... $10 per fallout, and $20 for Morrowind... Seems a bit high, like getting a new Xbox copy of the GOTY version of Morrowind... I'd say the prices should be half of what they are to be honest. Although we'll see during the Fall/Winter DRM-Free sales if the discounts make them worth getting.
I know, Bethesda's prices are on par with Blizzard. Newer games are about right, but classics are way too high. Want to have a go at Fallout but will wait till the next sale on either Steam or GOG, preferably GOG.