Posted April 20, 2018
Yes i found it (its not the one he was quoting which is what confused me)
What I meant there was that P might be suspicious of C and want to investigate him, but if C wasnt passed 2F policies, this no longer becomes necessary.
Anyway Im stopping now because this is becoming a farce. Im beginning to suspect this whole thing's purpose was just to tarnish my image. "Cant trust this ZFR. No smoke without fire".
My posts and reasonings ate there for all to see. Make up your own minds. I would care more if we werent in such a good position anyway.
Yes i found it (its not the one he was quoting which is what confused me)
What I meant there was that P might be suspicious of C and want to investigate him, but if C wasnt passed 2F policies, this no longer becomes necessary.
Anyway Im stopping now because this is becoming a farce. Im beginning to suspect this whole thing's purpose was just to tarnish my image. "Cant trust this ZFR. No smoke without fire".
My posts and reasonings ate there for all to see. Make up your own minds. I would care more if we werent in such a good position anyway.
Yes i found it (its not the one he was quoting which is what confused me)
What I meant there was that P might be suspicious of C and want to investigate him, but if C wasnt passed 2F policies, this no longer becomes necessary.
Anyway Im stopping now because this is becoming a farce. Im beginning to suspect this whole thing's purpose was just to tarnish my image. "Cant trust this ZFR. No smoke without fire".
My posts and reasonings ate there for all to see. Make up your own minds. I would care more if we werent in such a good position anyway.
What I meant there was that P might be suspicious of C and want to investigate him, but if C wasnt passed 2F policies, this no longer becomes necessary.
Anyway Im stopping now because this is becoming a farce. Im beginning to suspect this whole thing's purpose was just to tarnish my image. "Cant trust this ZFR. No smoke without fire".
My posts and reasonings ate there for all to see. Make up your own minds. I would care more if we werent in such a good position anyway.
Yes i found it (its not the one he was quoting which is what confused me)
What I meant there was that P might be suspicious of C and want to investigate him, but if C wasnt passed 2F policies, this no longer becomes necessary.
Anyway Im stopping now because this is becoming a farce. Im beginning to suspect this whole thing's purpose was just to tarnish my image. "Cant trust this ZFR. No smoke without fire".
My posts and reasonings ate there for all to see. Make up your own minds. I would care more if we werent in such a good position anyway.
Yes i found it (its not the one he was quoting which is what confused me)
What I meant there was that P might be suspicious of C and want to investigate him, but if C wasnt passed 2F policies, this no longer becomes necessary.
Anyway Im stopping now because this is becoming a farce. Im beginning to suspect this whole thing's purpose was just to tarnish my image. "Cant trust this ZFR. No smoke without fire".
My posts and reasonings ate there for all to see. Make up your own minds. I would care more if we werent in such a good position anyway.
Post edited April 20, 2018 by ZFR