It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
avatar
rtcvb32: Let's pull the quote up shall we?

avatar
MajicMan: islam has not been radicalized. islam is what islam has always been - a violent, terrorist, warmongering, oppressive, genital mutilating, pedophiliac, satanic-worshiping hate cult of non-human parasites.
avatar
rtcvb32: I have to agree with nearly all of the statement.

Nearly ALL terrorist attacks are from radicalized muslims; Even when they aren't they attack reporters and non-muslims and cover their faces.

They ARE oppressive, ESPECIALLY to women.

They DO genital mutilation especially to women, they also cut off your hand for stealing, and it's legal to behead their own wives for almost any reason at all.

A number of them ARE pedophiles as their koran texts encourages marrying as young as 9 yearolds, and having young boys as lovers (although being gay is punishable by death) and with regards to rape it was always the girl's fault. They have something called 'the rape game'.

I'm not sure about them being satanic worshipers, but they are considered by many to be a cancer.

http://www.billionbibles.org/sharia/sharia-law.html
"Civilized" nations perpetrate terrorism with fighter jets armed with cluster munitions. More efficient, more effective, and shittons more lethal.
Post edited March 26, 2017 by richlind33
avatar
rtcvb32: Let's pull the quote up shall we?
Or let's not do it. Because there are better places to discuss this. Not to talk about the fact that you obviously can't see the difference between islamist extremists and islam as a whole.

So no, I'm not going to swallow the bait. Discuss it with someone else.
avatar
PaterAlf: Or maybe you could visit a political forum, if you want to discuss this kind of stuff.
Totally agree with you .
I haven't counted, but most posts in this thread seem to be off-topic.
avatar
Shadowstalker16: We need a politics thread.
No, we don't, because even those threads devolve into intellectual crap-slinging. No one on this forum actually cares what anyone else on this forum thinks. They just want never-ending arguments -- never-ending because they refuse to let it end. They bicker back and forth attempting in vain to change the minds of people whose minds, like their own, are too stubborn to be changed. They only care about stroking their egos, whether or not they realize it.

Find another site (or maybe even make one yourself), and when someone wants to talk politics with you, invite them to take your debate there. Get it away from here, it's toxic, topic-derailing, and kills the atmosphere. I've been a GOGer since day one and stupid threads like this are what keep me from visiting and posting more often.
low rated
avatar
Shadowstalker16: We need a politics thread. Where things like this can be discussed. There is no other way. There are 3 or 4 posts at most discussing the JonTron topic in the last 3 pages.
Unfortunately, there are two problems with this idea:

1. Politics is too broad a topic to be confined to one thread.

2. What counts as "politics" and what does not is not something that people will agree on.

avatar
rtcvb32: Nearly ALL terrorist attacks are from radicalized muslims
That is actually incorrect, at least in the US:


http://www.globalresearch.ca/non-muslims-carried-out-more-than-90-of-all-terrorist-attacks-in-america/5333619
http://reason.com/archives/2017/03/24/do-muslims-commit-most-us-terrorist-atta
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/omar-alnatour/muslims-are-not-terrorist_b_8718000.html
Post edited March 26, 2017 by dtgreene
avatar
dtgreene: That is actually incorrect, at least in the US:
At least in the US. Well if the numbers confirm it for our country then I'm glad it's not higher. I'd rather have it at 0 worldwide. Still I wonder if it will stay that way if this continues.

But I'm not really interested in continuing this thought process, I'd rather talk about something lighter, preferably back on topic.
Post edited March 26, 2017 by rtcvb32
low rated
avatar
Pupcakes: Guess what? Walt Disney was a racist
And yet the Disney Corporation is making anti-racist statements literally by the minute and politically through their art (maybe you should boycott them for infusing their work with political stances?).

They have done so for many decades (I watched "Adventures in Babysitting" this week and their statement on gun culture in the US continues to greatly amuse me), though of course racist sentiments are still expressed in their art in older movies (I don't watch 'Peter Pan' any more – my favorite movie as a kid, because it just feels too icky).

What have we heard from JonTron in that respect? An "apology" that apologized for absolutely nothing. Fuck him. And fuck everyone who is STILL following him.

avatar
Pupcakes: Fine, I'll bite.
You really didn't. Please direct me to the Team17 and/or Playtronic tweets you were mentioning, in which they make additional statements about JonTron and the reason they're taking out his voice acting.

avatar
Pupcakes: Was Jon paid? Source? Proof of damages would be needed too.
One of the many unwritten laws of Kickstarter games is that participants are paid fairly. One of the unwritten and in part written laws of business is to not publish the extent of payment.

avatar
Pupcakes: I'm sorry, but this is what we call biting the hand that feeds you. You don't sit there with your hand out, and then expect people to be okay with you when you use the product as a political platform. Very stupid move, as proof by this whole debacle.
More finger pointing. What 'political viewpoint' Playtronic expressed I detailed above. Why wasn't JonTron biting the many hands that feed him when he expressed his?

He said that current immigration is to whites what apartheid was to South Africans.

Insinuated a Mexican plot to invade and take over parts of the US.

He's going with the narrative that the "white race is ending".

Unabashedly advocates for racial purity with the strictly racist idea of "incompatibility".

Insists the USA belongs to white people and was built by white people.

Voiced and consistently defended the absurd idea that black people are inherently more violent than white people.

Delves further and further into nazi eugenics.

Lied that poor white people would be less criminal than rich black people.

Signal boosted the racist viewpoints of Steve King, i.e. the racist "us vs. them" narrative.

Watched Stefan Molyneux. Wishes that Le Pen wins the French elections.

Seems to think that Germany is on the verge of becoming an Islamic country.

Thinks that there's no discrimination in Western countries.

Falsely states that courts don't show bias against people of color.

There's not a single thought seed here that hasn't been implanted in that empty brain cavity by white supremacists. But, hey, let's bash the people that don't want the guy in their game, thanks.
Post edited March 26, 2017 by Vainamoinen
low rated
avatar
Shadowstalker16: We need a politics thread. Where things like this can be discussed. There is no other way. There are 3 or 4 posts at most discussing the JonTron topic in the last 3 pages.
avatar
dtgreene: Unfortunately, there are two problems with this idea:

1. Politics is too broad a topic to be confined to one thread.

2. What counts as "politics" and what does not is not something that people will agree on.
What we need is some forumware that has a modicum of functionality. Freeware would be a huge improvement over what they're running now. It takes minutes to set up additional forums. Not months or years.

avatar
Vainamoinen: He said that current immigration is to whites what apartheid was to South Africans.

Insinuated a Mexican plot to invade and take over parts of the US.

He's going with the narrative that the "white race is ending".

Unabashedly advocates for racial purity with the strictly racist idea of "incompatibility".

Insists the USA belongs to white people and was built by white people.

Voiced and consistently defended the absurd idea that black people are inherently more violent than white people (that's literally eugenics).

Lied that poor white people would be less criminal than rich black people.

Signal boosted the racist viewpoints of Steve King, i.e. the racist "us vs. them" narrative.

Watched Stefan Molyneux. Wishes that Le Pen wins the French elections.

Seems to think that Germany is on the verge of becoming an Islamic country.

Thinks that there's no discrimination in Western countries.

Falsely states that courts don't show bias against people of color.

There's not a single thought seed here that hasn't been implanted in that brain cavity by white supremacists. But, hey, let's bash the people that don't want the guy in their game, thanks.
Maybe someone should remind him that he's half Iranian. lol
Post edited March 26, 2017 by richlind33
May I interest you authoritarian-left and alt-right people in duking it out over there:
http://hatebook.org/
?
low rated
avatar
rtcvb32: And discrimination for the most part HAS been removed from my experience (although the media would have you believe all whites are inherently racist and blacks can't be racist, and women are being overtly oppressed by the wage gap myth, among other things).
So the war on drugs has finally come to an end?

No? Well, let me know when it does, K?
Post edited March 26, 2017 by richlind33
low rated
avatar
richlind33: Maybe someone should remind him that he's half Iranian. lol
Iranian literally means "Aryan", and the culture has, historically, favored its lightest skinned people to the detriment of darker skinned. Just last year we had a shooter of Iranian descent in Munich, an unabashedly xenophobic little dude who exclusively shot at and killed darker skinned persons. That confused a lot of people, particularly those who desperately wanted to cling to that "us vs. them" narrative. It's of course absurd of JonTron to talk about racial purity and "assimiliation into the gene pool" while still being of Iranian descent. It's absurd that he thinks America belongs to and was built by "his people", i.e. whites.
Post edited March 26, 2017 by Vainamoinen
low rated
avatar
rtcvb32: Germany at this rate will become an Islamic country. I watched a UN presentation (2007-2008) saying it would by 2050 be an Islamic Republic.
Right at the moment there are 4.4 to 4.7 million muslims living in Germany. That's 5.5 to 5.7% of the whole population. Out of those about one million are so called "cultural muslims", which means they come from country where the islam is common, but don't practice their religion anymore.

[url=http://www.deutschlandfunk.de/zahl-der-muslime-in-deutschland-wie-viel-millionen-sind-es.886.de.html?dram:article_id=375505]http://www.deutschlandfunk.de/zahl-der-muslime-in-deutschland-wie-viel-millionen-sind-es.886.de.html?dram:article_id=375505[/url]

So how exactly will Germany become an Islamic Religion in just 30 years???
low rated
avatar
PaterAlf: So how exactly will Germany become an Islamic Religion in just 30 years???
We'll all convert to Islam, obviously. Doesn't work any other way, because those Muslims don't even reproduce quickly enough for rctvb32's big scare, and there aren't enough migrants even if we basically take all of them. So, you and me, wam, Muslims. Soon. Better to buy the hijab today.

DAMMIT it's Sunday all stores are closed

DAMN THE CHRISTIAN OPPRESSION WHEN WILL THIS FINALLY END
Post edited March 26, 2017 by Vainamoinen
low rated
avatar
PaterAlf: So how exactly will Germany become an Islamic Religion in just 30 years???
Immigration and breeding.

It sounds silly, but it's not. It's said you need a birth rate of 2.11 in order to maintain a civilization, this is that when two people marry they have 2-3 kids, which replace them when they die keeping the population more or less stable. In Germany has a 1.3 and France 1.8. So they are having fewer kids, and under 1.9 it's already irreversible to fix (as it takes 80-100 years to self-correct), so you have immigration to fill in those numbers. And who they are bringing in, the birth rate is 8.1 per household...

This has nothing to do with fertility, purely on birthrate. (so factoring in abortion, etc)

I believe this is the right video, I originally watched it on a different platform.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrA_9SoCitk