It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Cristigale gets 20 minutes lynch immunity for understanding me better than Bookwyrm.
Bookwyrm gets 20 minutes lynch vulnerability as punishment for the same. He gets 1/4 of vote from mod during that time.
Post edited July 06, 2015 by Vitek
avatar
Vitek: Cristigale gets 20 minutes lynch immunity for understanding me better than Bookwyrm.
Bookwyrm gets 20 minutes lynch vulnerability instead as punishment. He gets 1/4 of vote from mod during that time.
Pffft, there is no understanding you Vitek so stop hitting on poor Cristigale ;-)
Game stuff now.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: The obvious answer, then, is to think your way out of the circle. You can choose to (A) believe me, (B) disbelieve me, or (C) Provisionally select A or B while waiting for more information.
avatar
agentcarr16: You do have a point there. Actually, come to think of it, you have a really good point there.
Problem is that there's a circle in the first place. While you are telling the villagers to think their way out of the circle, I would prefer not to have created a circle in the first place. However, each to his own, and now that I understand your reasoning, (at least, I think I do) I can leave it alone.
Problem with trying not to create such a circle in the first place is that I've written posts in previous games that I thought were logically straight forward, with me outlining every step I took to get to my conclusion, and people STILL managed to end up in the WIFOM circle. No one ever quite disputed the logic, just that I'd said it (whatever "it" was). I've seen circles made out of some other people's posts that I thought were straight forward, too. So I pretty much assume that circles may happen regardless of what is said.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: You think one townie risking his life to draw information from half of town isn't worthwhile? When I die, and with my behavior I fully expect the question is "when", I think my actions will serve my side.
avatar
agentcarr16: Yes. But I don't think you're getting any information, besides vague reactions that could or could not have any relevance on the reactionary's faction.
I'm not expecting any sudden revelations that concretely prove someone's alignment. That isn't the point. The point is to get people reacting to things (on record, as some others have said). Then their reaction to this and other events, taken as a whole, might be good evidence of their alignment. The more data points that are gathered, the better the chances of getting a good read on the player.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: Final note: I'll be more serious about my voting point forward. As a last hurrah, I'll remove my vote on yogsloth when someone can identify the player that triggered my vote on him.
avatar
agentcarr16: I'm glad that you're going to be more serious...wait. Have you changed your mind between the period and the capital A? If you have a good reason for your vote to be on yogsloth, then why would you remove it for some trivia? If you don't have a good reason for your vote on yogsloth, then why wouldn't you take it off, without waiting for trivia?
To be clear, I'm actually amused when people make crazy votes. I do sometimes feel that this game takes itself a little too seriously. But, if you state that you are going to be serious, do it.
I haven't changed my mind. My current vote on yogsloth is an RVS vote, and holds approximately the same weight. I'll remove it when someone answers the trivia, or if something pressing occurs. As to why not remove it now: there is no need. He's in no danger of being lynched, and I haven't seen any strong candidates for scum. In the meantime, I'd like to see if anyone will actually take a few minutes to figure out why yogsloth got the vote in the first place. There is a method to the selection.

avatar
agentcarr16: Also, could someone post a link to the rules pages? Disclaimer: I HAVE read them. I just want to go over them again, and I can't seem to find a link in the game thread.
If you want the rules for this specific game, then check the first post in this thread. If you want the general GOG mafia rules, guidelines, and helpful guides, then check the Mafia Admin thread.

Pre-post edit: Looks like Krypsyn already answered this. The first post in the admin thread has some other links that might be of interest to you.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: JMich mentioned it at one point in passing. GOG's site seems to be crapping out on me, but I can't tell if the issue is GOG, my internet, or my computer. If I remember, I'll try again later.
avatar
cristigale: I think I can answer this one…RWarehall questioned JMich’s use of term “arsonists” here:
JMich's post 212 is where "arsonists" first came up.

Also, it appears that my modem and router needed to be reset; my internet is working much better again.
Holiday weekend is winding to a close, so I’m back in to try and catch up. Incredibly busy today - how amazingly fun is that? Fantastic! It will take me two posts to cover everything.

avatar
trentonlf: I tell you I prefer not to keep talking about roles or PMs, yet you want to specifically mention my name in relation to why we should. Are you just trying to antagonize me?
Who, me? Do what? No, no, no. Yes. No. NO. No, sorry. I meant no. What was the question again?

avatar
bler144: -Bullies suck. But was that ranting nutjob really our friend? I mean, s/he did call me a doucheface. Ironically, not to my face. And after all I did for him/her - man, the nerve of that c__ and/or c___!

Frankly I think the town is better off now that they've gone. Y'know, assuming they don't sneak back into town at night as a vigilante or something.

Though really, there's only 14 of us, and presumably we don't all have amnesia. Wouldn't one of us remember who that was? Maybe they have really good makeup, or a Zorro costume or something.
Part 1. This might have been a little bit more than I was really asking for there. Should we mark this? Should we leave this for later? Until Part 2…

avatar
flubbucket: I got a rather galling letter from corporate reminding me to continue providing excellent service and to basically keep doing my job until the end.
I think you should burn the place down and steal their red Swingline.

avatar
RWarehall: I'm going to say this much. The game of Mafia is won and lost by the town, not the scum.
Well, I just want to point out the whole reason I got started doing this was watching Krypsyn and Mr. Meyow tie everyone in knots in the werewolf game.

avatar
agentcarr16: This is the kind of admissions that I like. Trentonlf is fairly certain Bookwyrm is scum, but he realizes that if Bookwyrm flips town, then trentonlf will be in a spot of hot water. (Rather sneakily, he still pushes that he is town with his "'unfortunate' next candidate" line.)
Why do you like this admission? What’s likeable about it? From what perspective?

avatar
agentcarr16: This is absolutely ridiculous. So because Krypsyn flipped votes around for no reason in the Space game, then Bookwyrm flipping votes around in the Gallows game must be scum.
There is absolutely no logic here. You cannot draw lines between two totally different players and expect results. Now, if 90% of scum flipped votes around for no reason, then I would understand. However, then we would also have a problem with Krypsyn, and maybe with bler144 as well. So, yogsloth, you have found 1 half-decent reason in 3 tries.
So I’m batting .167? That’s not too bad for a pitcher, though, right?

Here’s a thing: you think my logic stinks? I’ve already said I’m operating on gut here, but yes, I believe that someone flipping a vote on me when I’ve started piecing something together is a scum tell. It happened this exact way with Krypsyn in the space game, Sage in the milk game, Jmich in the game show game… it keeps happening. You don’t like it, fine, then YOU vote for somebody and wow me with your amazing logic on why you did so.

avatar
trentonlf: So you are thinking a disgruntled former townie has come back as a Vigilante or similar role to wreak vengeance on the bullies who wronged them. Would that automatically make them a third faction though? If they were a serial killer, or someone who had an action every night I could see a third faction. But, if they are a Vigilante they probably have limited shots and are still just a townie that is not happy with the way things are. But if they have returned and are a threat to town then I will do all I can to stop them.

I also see your point of the gender question, the default for most people is to say "he" in reference to anyone. I try and take it at face value, but there are times that a "he" is really a "she".
Now see… this is the type of clear, levelheaded thinking that we need when discussing our private messages. Good job, Trent, and thanks.

avatar
Krypsyn: yogsloth does have a problem with me.
Well, that sounds a bit meaner than it needs to. I’m less than thrilled about your juvenile delinquency, but at least you’re having fun with it.

avatar
RWarehall: As to PM discussion, I disagree with both JMich and Trent, assuming people are smart about it. (...)

People can discuss PMs responsibly and it does create useful discussion which helps town more than scum, assuming people don't slip and reveal their roles. In a normal game, the PM shouldn't even be an issue, as everyone should have the same one and its clearly posted in the OP. This game seems a bit different. It appears everyone has a slightly different one and its possible, we have all been given little clues about the enemy (or else Vitek is just completely yanking our chains).
…and yet you haven’t chimed in with any information from your PM, have you?

avatar
bler144: The most amusing 'unbalanced' scenario would be no mafia at all, and just several pro-town vigilantes and a few survivalists. It's highly unlikely one would have a mafia game with no mafia, but it's one potential explanation for Vitek's suggestion that 'no lynch might be a good play.' Or perhaps, and probably more likely, Vitek is recalling the last mafia game he moderated where there 3 lynches over the course of the game (based on the summary) and each time it was a townie who went down. Whoops!

I also don't really tend to believe no-lynch is a big mistake (and an anecdotal perusal of prior games doesn't seem to support that it is either), but I'm willing to play along if people are certain it's a must.
Here’s Part 2. I tell ya bler, I’m glad you’re in the game because you’re active and entertaining, but I really don’t know where you’re going with all this. What you’re doing is making it really REALLY sound like you know something you’re dying to share.

So what I would tell you is – and this may surprise sooooome of you – be very careful about sharing it. Despite what I’m being accused of, I don’t think it’s a good idea to discuss roles, for some of the very reasons pointed out by Trent and JMich. In this game, I think pooling flavor is a good idea… but don’t go too far and reveal something you don’t want Scum to know.

avatar
dedoporno: Everyone is scum, nobody is scum
I already commented on this one earlier.

avatar
bler144: 2) The OP in this thread notes that this person insulted everyone in town. Being in town, I would have been insulted. That's right out there on the table. It's possible the specific language I stated having been called was PM info and I revealed something of value, or perhaps it's just narrative color I pulled out of my behind to deepen the story, as it were.
Part 3. See Part 2.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: That's true, bad guys might use it too. So you need to examine the content of my posting to figure out if I'm a bad guy. Just don't forget to examine all of the people that talk about my posting, also. You not only have what I've said, you now have what half a dozen other people have said about what I've said to consider.
But what about what you’ve said they’ve said about what you’ve said I said? Should I consider that? I keep asking you to help me here, and this is what I get from you.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: You think one townie risking his life to draw information from half of town isn't worthwhile? When I die, and with my behavior I fully expect the question is "when", I think my actions will serve my side.
Except that if you are Town and get yourself lynched because of douchebaggery so impossible to ignore than even the hardiest Town players feel compelled to point it out over and over again, and then lynch you for it, it spoils the information. Call it the “HijacK Conundrum”. If you ARE Town Wyrm, and get yourself lynched, what the hell am I supposed to learn from your wagon, except that the overwhelming consensus was that you deserved it? As you pointed out, if you flipped Town, do you really think anyone is going to assume Trent is scum for starting your wagon? I think your information you’re trying to draw stinks, and I think you’re smarter than that. Vote stays.

Cutting it off here – it’s getting too long, but I’ll be back probably in ~2 hours.
avatar
Vitek: Cristigale gets 20 minutes lynch immunity for understanding me better than Bookwyrm.
Bookwyrm gets 20 minutes lynch vulnerability as punishment for the same. He gets 1/4 of vote from mod during that time.
Other than the limited lynch immunity, I'm not sure if understanding Vitek better than Bookwyrm is a good thing or a bad thing. ;-p
avatar
Vitek: Cristigale gets 20 minutes lynch immunity for understanding me better than Bookwyrm.
Bookwyrm gets 20 minutes lynch vulnerability as punishment for the same. He gets 1/4 of vote from mod during that time.
10 minutes have passed.

I AM THE PRETTIEST PRINCESS! (for less than 10 more minutes)
Attachments:
avatar
yogsloth: Well, that sounds a bit meaner than it needs to.
Did it? It wasn't intentional.

avatar
yogsloth: I’m less than thrilled about your juvenile delinquency, but at least you’re having fun with it.
Book covers can be distracting, I suppose.
avatar
yogsloth: In this game, I think pooling flavor is a good idea… but don’t go too far and reveal something you don’t want Scum to know.
What do we want scum not to know about the PMs? I've been wondering if there is some distinct difference between the town and scum PMs or objectives. If we all start sharing, then the question is whether scum will simply keep their mouths shut and "go last".

avatar
Bookwyrm627: That's true, bad guys might use it too. So you need to examine the content of my posting to figure out if I'm a bad guy. Just don't forget to examine all of the people that talk about my posting, also. You not only have what I've said, you now have what half a dozen other people have said about what I've said to consider.
avatar
yogsloth: But what about what you’ve said they’ve said about what you’ve said I said? Should I consider that? I keep asking you to help me here, and this is what I get from you.
What about it? Yes.
I'm not asking you not to scrutinize me. I'm asking you not to tunnel vision on me. Did I miss a specific question from you? If so, state it. If not, then come up with something I can answer.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: You think one townie risking his life to draw information from half of town isn't worthwhile? When I die, and with my behavior I fully expect the question is "when", I think my actions will serve my side.
avatar
yogsloth: Except that if you are Town and get yourself lynched because of douchebaggery so impossible to ignore than even the hardiest Town players feel compelled to point it out over and over again, and then lynch you for it, it spoils the information. Call it the “HijacK Conundrum”. If you ARE Town Wyrm, and get yourself lynched, what the hell am I supposed to learn from your wagon, except that the overwhelming consensus was that you deserved it? As you pointed out, if you flipped Town, do you really think anyone is going to assume Trent is scum for starting your wagon? I think your information you’re trying to draw stinks, and I think you’re smarter than that. Vote stays.
It shouldn't spoil the information. I've explained what I did and why I did it. If I get lynched, then you can see I was telling the truth, and look at people's reactions in that light. I don't expect ANYONE to get lynched based solely on their reaction to me. If you'd read my posts, you should be able to see that I've said this, over and over and over and over and...

Was my method a good idea? Maybe, maybe not. It was an idea, and I tried it out. If you don't like new ideas, then...something. I don't know what, you figure it out!
avatar
Bookwyrm627: I'm asking you not to tunnel vision....
:P
Part 2. Turns out there wasn’t much left.

avatar
dedoporno: The broken clock wasn't meant as an insult, but in my eyes you are one of the few who tend to wrap themselves up in crazy conspiracy theories more often than not but one doesn't know when the craziest one of the bunch will turn out to be true. I hope I didn't offend you but if I did I apologize.
No offense taken at all. Lol, I’m way past that point. But seriously – show me one crazy conspiracy theory (that didn’t involve HijacK) I had that didn’t turn out to be exactly correct. Can ya do that, eh?

avatar
Bookwyrm627: I haven't changed my mind. My current vote on yogsloth is an RVS vote, and holds approximately the same weight. I'll remove it when someone answers the trivia, or if something pressing occurs. As to why not remove it now: there is no need. He's in no danger of being lynched, and I haven't seen any strong candidates for scum. In the meantime, I'd like to see if anyone will actually take a few minutes to figure out why yogsloth got the vote in the first place. There is a method to the selection.
Your current vote… is a Random Voting Stage vote… random vote… but it has a purpose and a method? I wait with baited breath.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: Was my method a good idea? Maybe, maybe not. It was an idea, and I tried it out. If you don't like new ideas, then...something. I don't know what, you figure it out!
We’ll find out, I suppose. I appreciate the entertainment if nothing else. If we lynch you and you flip Scum, then no, acting as Scummy as possible to try to not look Scum wasn’t a very good idea for you. If we lynch you and you flip Town, we’ll have to see at the end-game if the info you flushed out was helpful or not.

However, if you don’t get lynched at all and get to continue doing what you’re doing, then it was a great idea and I wish I had thought of it.

General notes:

Lots of people giving Krypsyn grief over his inexplicable votes. I don’t think one single person has asked JMich about who he’s voting for, or why. Why is that?

I don’t take the slightly whimsical nature of Vitek’s rules too seriously. I highly doubt anybody got a flagrantly mistaken PM, and I don’t think he’s going to suddenly change any rules. Great catch on the potential double-voter, though. Wrym does score some points there.

I would, however, like to throw out something a little crazy. Not to discuss to death now, but just to make us all aware: Back in the signup thread, Vitek let us know when he sent out [url=PMs]http://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_28_sign_up_thread/post128[/url]. There was no announcement of a game thread, however. One quietly appeared, but I was one of the players that didn’t even notice it. It was in the game thread, not the signup thread, that there was some kind of announcement (now erased) that the game couldn’t start until certain players acknowledged or confirmed their PMs somehow. Apparently, I wasn’t one of them, since I didn’t know one way or the other until it was pointed out to me back in the signup thread.

This process of Vitek getting the confirmation he needed took quite some hours.

Who had to confirm and why? Was there a Night Zero for some players? I was a little aggravated at the time, as that was the first thing I thought of.

It may make zero difference today, but I strongly suspect some of you do have more information that the typical Day one nothingness. Just a thought. Sleep soundly. Don’t let the bed bugs… BITE!!!!
avatar
yogsloth: Lots of people giving Krypsyn grief over his inexplicable votes.
Which votes have I made which I haven't explained in whole or in part. Examples, please.
avatar
yogsloth: Lots of people giving Krypsyn grief over his inexplicable votes.
avatar
Krypsyn: Which votes have I made which I haven't explained in whole or in part. Examples, please.
PFFFfjfhhhfhfhhfhht. Excuse me.


And obviously, I horribly borked the url above. Just go back to the signup thread.
avatar
yogsloth: And obviously, I horribly borked the url above.
Well, that's what happens when the process gets politicized... maybe your next nominee will fare better. :)
avatar
yogsloth: One quietly appeared, but I was one of the players that didn’t even notice it. It was in the game thread, not the signup thread, that there was some kind of announcement (now erased) that the game couldn’t start until certain players acknowledged or confirmed their PMs somehow. Apparently, I wasn’t one of them, since I didn’t know one way or the other until it was pointed out to me back in the signup thread.

This process of Vitek getting the confirmation he needed took quite some hours.

Who had to confirm and why? Was there a Night Zero for some players? I was a little aggravated at the time, as that was the first thing I thought of.
I quite enjoyed your past two posts. On this point you raise an interesting question.

Up til game start point there wasn't really anything to the see in the game thread, just the OP more or less as is now with a "GAME NOT YET STARTED - DO NOT POST!" message at the end. So I suspect that if I hadn't already linked the game thread over to the sign-up (for trent? someone asked about it) that Vitek would have don so when it was underway.

As for why he was waiting for everyone, it's possible there were key roles he was waiting for, Dunno - but then I wasn't one of them. Also possible his overall design just required 14 bodies - some of the guides I was looking at had this huge array of wacky roles that weren't recommended with fewer than 14,15,16+.

I tend to think he just wanted 14 people in the fray, but you could well be right that those last few are more significant. IIRC there were only 5-6 of us gabbing in the sign-up thread in that window (which is what drew the early accusation from CSP), so best case scenario, even if your theory is right, I think you'd be hard pressed to suss out who the 2-4 last responders might have been.

/shrug
avatar
yogsloth: I don’t think one single person has asked JMich about who he’s voting for, or why. Why is that?
RVS vote due to last game? I assume most people can understand that.
Or are you worried that scum got voted in the very first post of the game? :P