JoeSapphire: I said I'd reread dedo and vitek didn't I? I haven't done.
And yet dedo is your top pick...
dedoporno: . @Lift, is that the point you're making?
Approximately, yes. I think Yogs thought that he had a convenient target. He admits, that he hasn't really read the rules. And yet he tries to use them as an argument. What's even worse are the other two points, however. They show that he didn't even really read the replys of the person he is targeting. That, again, shows that he wasn't really interested in analyzing Scene, just in making him a convenient target, because Scene always looks scummy enough to be a convenient target.
Carradice: Or the updates about Lift.
Vitek: Yeah, about LIft, it kind of seems your town read is based on the fact he is not going after you if I read that right. It feels like a bit too much selfish reason. Even more considering you supposedly wanted to cop him.
Yes, I noticed that too. Carradice seems to base his reads at least partially on OMGUS/Defense reaction. And when the threat disappears, he lets up. That is definitely selective perception which can be due to a scummy mindset. Actually his D1 defensiveness still looks scummy.
However, I have to keep in mind that I have a bit of selective perception too. I guess everyone has and it's something I try to work at. I tend to only really notice the players who directly interact with me. I find it very hard to get a read on someone who doesn't discuss with me. For example, I keep meanin to get a better read on Flocke. But they are so little present that that is really hard. The little that is there looks reasonable, I guess. There is nothing that screams 'scum' but nothing that screams 'town' either and without direct interaction my gut feeling doesn't seem to kick in. So all I have is a 'leaning scum due to lurkiness'.
JoeSapphire: so
b - would "you target someone and they will become copproof" exist as a role? The answer is yes that sounds unreliable but interesting. Would probably work better if the players knew that such a role could exist? Would pooka put one in his game? Perhaps...
c - would "you make yourself immune to investigation" exist as a role, without "and all other actions" as in the commuter? Yes that's copproof, it's a role only mafia would have which is a great reason to give it to a town player. lololol
An example for b would be the variant of the Jailer who makes their target untargetable for all other night-actions.
An example of c, beyond Commuter, would be any role with the 'Ascetic' modifier.
However, as ZFR pointed out, this speculation is moot anyhow. Scum most likely wouldn't leave a claimed real Cop alive, unless they have a reliable way to make him useless. They couldn't know whom Carradice would target. So scenarios b and c would be unreliable. So if Carradice is Town, the presence of a scum role-blocker is the only reasonable explanation for leaving the claimed Cop alive. Or in other words, Carradice was either blocked or is scum. (that was one of the reasons to ask, whether there was any clear flavour of having been blocked)
ZFR: If I knew scum were very powerful themselves then I wouldn't call Doc-Cop-Com-etc overpowered.
I seriously doubt that. Even if you, as scum, knew the setup to be balanced, you could still try to make that argument to doubt the veracity of a Cop-claim. The Town-players don't know the role setup. So I trust that scum!ZFR would be totally able to make a case out of a powerful role setup, even if he knew the scum powers.
This is one of those 'I wouldn't do that as scum!' sentences that make me very wary. Because I have too often successfully used such an argument myself when I were scum.
Current read update:
ZFR, after clearing up our mutual misunderstanding, is less scummy. However, still leaning scum. Too much focus on role speculation, posts like the last one I quoted and an overall feeling, that his scum hunting is faked. Still in the 'would lynch pool', though at a low priority.
Joe, with making dedo his top pick without good reasons, yes, even admitting that he didn't re-read him as he meant to, joins the 'would lynch' pool.
- incidentally @ZFR: what is your read on Joe now?
trent - no change.
Yogs - no change. Still my top pick.
Carradice - no change, still a reasonable lynch, especially since his flip would enable us to analyze some connections. However, I'd prefer to hit scum and not only go for an 'information gain flip'. And to my feeling, hitting scum is more likely when lynching Yogs than when lynching Carradice.
Note @all: the weekend is coming again and that means I won't be present much until Sunday evening.