FlockeSchnee: Why are you only asking me that question? Take a look at:
(bolding by me)
So, that "you are actively looking for any reasons to find me scummy because you want to come to that conclusion" (1139) right back at you.
Unless of course my theory in 918 might actually be right and you're on a Mafia team with Dedo and that's why you didn't notice, he did the same thing.
dedoporno: Funny thing this. I explicitly made sure to use the word "assuming" in that very sentence because earlier Lift gave me hard time about a similar statement where I uses "considering" instead "of assuming". Talk about "no winning".
My point is that he corrected your "considering" into "assuming" and "if" is just the short version of "assuming" (someone correct me if I'm wrong on this). So he souldn't have taken issue with that. Or is that what you meant?
About the in-between bit: It just seemed to me, that this possibility fell under the table. And that could have been deliberatly. That's why I brought it up again. Otherwise Fair enough.
FlockeSchnee: Honestly: I still think it's suspicous to state things explicitly "for the record". Everyone (who wants to) can read up on this. Why emphasize this? I don't understand the need to point that out unless to appear towny.
dedoporno: To each their own. Feel free to see it however you see fit but that's how I play. I like to be as honest as possible when I can (regardless of alignment).
So you do that every game as you see fit, and regardless of alignment?
Can those who have played with dedo before confirm this, if they may?´That would be one (useless) thing less to clock up my mind from now on then.
FlockeSchnee: I'm suspecting WIFOM (from Carradice's point of view). So I'm taking who he voted for and refused to vote for into account. I stated a possible Lift-Carradice connection in my post 918.
Why are you (Vitek) acting like I want to lynch them both "just to be sure" or something? It just seems to me that either of them could give valuable info to review possible suspects/find new ones as appropriate. (Or they are both town.) If you now want to know why I voted ZFR for wanting info: See my previous posts (and the very top and bottom of this post) on that.
...
Vitek: I said nothing like that.
It was that you called Lift scummy because Carradice voted for him as well as you called scummy Microfish because Carradice returned to vote him.
It seems like you were just looking for comfirmation for your view of them being scummy (or looking for any reason to accuse them) and any of those actions made them look scummy to you.
Damned if they do, damned if they don't.
? You mean because Carradice
refused to vote him
at the end of Day1? Like I wrote.
Yes, I stated, that I'm willing to vote Lift, because Carradice voted him at the end of Day1. (could be distancing (MafiaLift), could be shading (TownLift), could be nothing at all (TownLift, but Carradice didn't care for shading, not sure if a MafiaLift would make sense here)).
Yes, I stated, that I'm willing to vote Micro, because Carradice refused him at the end of Day1. (could be being worried about it looking like distancing (MafiaMicro), could be shading (TownMicro, but hoping people might view it as the former MafiaMicro scenario), could be nothing at all (TownMicro, but Carradice didn't care for shading, not sure if a MafiaMicro would make sense here)).
from 1069 (note how I'm only talking about the vote count for when Day1 ended)
"Going of Carradice's actions
at the end of Day1, right now, my main suspects are
05. Microfish_1 (Mohamed Salem) (Carradice refusing to vote him
at the end of Day1)
and
02. Lifthrasil (Lathif ben Rasil) (Carradice opting to vote him at the end of Day1) + His way of twisting things around and a possible coordinated play of Carradice and Lift as stated in post 918.
In 1138 I just saw I didn't excplicitly state that my former stated reasons in regard to Micro also apply here (not just Lift), but they do. That never changed for me. (see quote and explanations above.
Unless stated otherwise, former reasons remain.
trentonlf: https://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_67_mamlakat_al_shams/post1160, why state "Well no counter claim from me", it almost looks like a "Don't look at me" statement.
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_67_mamlakat_al_shams/post1071, This post looks bad now too to me, it looks like Flocke is trying to cast shade on Micro.
About 1160:
I posted that one and then saw the avalanche of posts that came in between. Namely: Micro's claim and Lift stating to wait for a possible counter-claim. So I dropped that post before going to sleep, to keep people from wondering if I had even seen it.
About 1071: I messed up the quote in 1069 and I wanted to keep it all in one because they all have they have the Micro-dedo-connection in common.
(1138) "I just wanted to see what you answered to my questions. If it stays consistent/if my thoughts were right."
And that bolded line thing struck me just as odd as dedo's "for the record".