trentonlf: Again I will hold your hand and explain, we have only had one lynch not lynches.
JMich: While English is not my first language, I am quite certain that when speaking generally, you can use the plural form of a noun. So if a team's quarterback fails to touchdown, a statement of "It seems that their quarterbacks can't score even in the bedroom" is valid, even if only one quarterback has exhibited said behavior. Feel free to correct my grammar, in case I'm mistaken.
trentonlf: You are also not including the possibility that we only get a flip if a townie is killed.
JMich: So you say that TwilightBard was scum? Then how did our coroner die? Town vigilante that has not owned up to his mistake? Or could TwilightBard be a townie that went and investigated Robbeasy, and died due to PGO, while scum Night Killed Darko13? Or do we have two scum factions, along with at least 2 neutrals? How many would be left that are town then?
The plural form infers multiple lynches and there has only been one. In your example if only one quarterback had been playing you would not use the plural form in reference to how he played, unless he was the teams only quarterback.
There is a possibility that TB was scum, no one but the scum knows so I have no idea if he was. All I have said is your argument is we need to assume there will be no flip on a lynch so a no lynch should be considered. Your reasoning as to why discounts every possibility except the one that makes a no lynch seem the best option. As I have already said, a no lynch allows scum to manipulate the situation and you are pressing the no lynch angle too hard.
As to how many scum or neutral parties are left, I have no idea. All I can say is at this time I believe yog's, Robb, and CSPVG. I also feel that adalibooks, sage, and cristigale are strong town. The rest I am unsure about. You pushing the no lynch is too scummy, more scummy than how I feel ddickinson has been playing so my vote is on you and will stay.