Ahh, how I love to make a stir and see what rises to the top. Let's not dilly-dally any longer, ladies and not-ladies, we need to come to a decision openly and intelligently, not just have everyone tossing votes around in a frenzy. I'll try to address all issues that were had with my issues of the issues.

@dedo #114 just seems all sorts of antagonistic with no purpose

You're confusing intent with effect.

How are you a professor if you can't even read words accurately? COULD, not DO.

Because if everyone has the name of someone, then that just happens by default that some people have scum names as their dislike.

Please pay more attention. This is a serious matter. If you aren't going to devote yourself to this institute, you shouldn't be here. To me, it is scummy if you don't pay more attention.

Curious because the information has been revealed, even if that it hasn't been from a flip. Indicates to me that you could be lying about your name, though I don't find that very likely at all.

Yes, that's basically my issue with dedo currently.

I asked if they would to see if they would, not to find out who they are (that would have been a bi-product, obviously, but not my intent when asking the question.) My guess is that they wouldn't, and they haven't. It was more of a rhetorical thing. However, if they do/did come out and identify themselves after I asked if they would, I would find it more possible that my read on dedo's behavior would have become more irrelevant, but that is not what has happened.

WOW, that is filled with all sorts of scummy, HSL. I tire of talking and no one listening and if they do they are just using it as a means to paint me in a bad light and twist things around rather than try to understand them (as it seems to me you are doing, not actually trying to understand my issues, but looking for any reason to raise issue with my issues.) In the past I might have given a more thorough response. Now, simply know that you've pinged my scumdar hard a few places here and have moved up my suspicion list.

I find all of your counter logic to be moot because you disregard the possibility that meaningful information is hidden within the flavor. Meaning: some people could have dislike information in their PM that is pure flavor and means nothing other than to add a layer of intigue to the game, BUT, others could have dislike info. in their PM that points to scum, obviously the town player does not know that it is pointing them to scum, and to them it is essentially flavor, but I think it remains a high possibility that some people are pointed to scum, while others are pointed to pettiness. I think it could be related to intellect level, some teachers here are obviously smarter than others. This adds MORE to the intrigue, especially for the moderators watching, which is something I would consider yogsloth to have done and why I think it is not actually helpful to share this information currently. Then you go on to try and make me look more scummy by suggesting I've not considered a possibility that seems like the obvious thing to consider. No, I'm just being cautious IN CASE, because obviously name information doesn't help town much right now, and it could (I find this more possible to be the case) help scum plan and plot against us/turn us against each other.

I'm also much less interested in "doing myself favors if I'm town" (which I am) and more interested in doing what is pro-town so that we can win, whether that gives me heat or not or makes people dislike me, is fine, as long as it is pro-town.

I believe it could be sensible to share that information once the person has died. PlayerD dies, they flip NameName. PlayerB comes out and says "I didn't like NameName." Just information at that point to be added to information of future points. It could be useful, it could be distracting. Right now it is a bit of both, and I think that is what yogsloth intended.

Umm, you are a teacher, right? You do know the difference between a period (.) indicating a statement/declaration and a question mark (?) indicating a query? I ask because, NO, I didn't jump to any conclusion, I asked a question, trying to understand agentcarr's behavior. I'm scummy because I'm trying to understand? You obviously misrepresent me. Yeahhh, you were already quite high on my suspicion list, and there you will remain.

And if this is the case, dedo doing what he did does nothing but confuse and distract the real matter. Hence my vote on dedo.

We need to decide, are we going to make the name-stuff be what we vote around, or are we going to try and figure something else out to figure out who is likely to be most scummy? I want to know everyone's thoughts here. If we vote for name-stuff, my vote stays on dedo. If not, I'm curious as to what other avenue of voting we could/should take.

There's not much else to go on that I see, really, as D1 goes, and I'm sufficiently comfortable with voting any of 3 different players at this point for most-likely-to-be-scum. They are dedo, hunter, and HSL. Trentonlf, krypsyn, and agentcarr have also pinged my scum-dar every so slightly.

Agreed, hence my vote on dedoporno, it was just scummy distracting behavior with no ability to have the revealing of the dislike mean anything solid. This again re-iterates my logic. Had dedoporno waited until someone was dead and had that person in their PM, it would have made sense to say "hey, I didn't like them", doing it in the reverse only causes confusion/distraction.

Ummm, what? I'm not focused on that. I'm focused on the people who were focused on that/using it as a point of discussion when I didn't think it should be. Now because of my focus on that, it has become a point of discussion. Wade through the mess, see the original of the confusion. Unless you're scum and trying to make my wagon roll, of course.

Contradictory much? Confusing the situation much by interchanging player name with character name?
Why do you care about people's names and dislikes? Fishy.