© 2007–2009 Ubisoft Entertainment. All rights reserved. World in Conflict, Massive Entertainment, the Massive Entertainment logo, Ubisoft, Ubi.com, and the Ubisoft logo are registered trademarks of Ubisoft Entertainment in the U.S. and/or other countries.
MULTIPLAYER NOTICE: Online servers have been shut down, multiplayer is accessible only through a LAN connection.
MULTIPLAYER NOTICE: Online servers have been shut down, multiplayer is accessible only through a LAN connection.
Posted on: March 7, 2019
Sizonia
验证所有者游戏: 12 评论: 1
Bought it for the story (gameplay helps)
As the title suggests, the story is great: I've played through it twice (first on easy, then on normal), and it never fails to be engaging. Gameplay is also great; The point allocation is, in my opinion, vastly superior to base-building. I'd strongly recommend it. Multiplayer is probably also fun, but I haven't tried it.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: August 4, 2023
magoggames
验证所有者游戏: 1 评论: 1
I am not big on RTS games as a whole
Mainly because of the micromanaging aspect (esp. resources and base or unit building). I would classify WiC as an RTT (real-time tactics) game. I first got into this genre via Tom Clancy's EndWar, but even I felt that one was kinda lacking something (too arcadish, but I blame it on the fact that it was made with consoles in mind). I credit WiC for bringing me closer to the RTS genre, due to its accessibility and user-friendliness. However, once you master this game, you're left wanting more. This inadvertently drew me back into playing games like Warcraft 3 (which I am currently addicted to). This game is the perfect stepping stone to finer things and will make you appreciate it more as you look back and see how far you've come with this genre.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: November 18, 2016
SpinningCone
验证所有者游戏: 459 评论: 44
Too much action, little strategy
Despite all the good reviews i wasn't really able to get into this game. I like strategy games to have pauses , chances for strategy, to know the units, to plan an attack. This is not that kind of game. maybe the later levels change but the first few are non-stop action and goal oriented play. basically go to spot A shoot enemies hold position b no go to spot c and kill more. every few minutes the camera is flying around and commanders are barking orders and it's onto the next objective. no reprieve, no chance to think about your troops or what to do just go-go-go and with very specific directives all the time i rarely felt that I was actually in control, just grunt following orders. Combined with the constant chaos of explosions and allied units and the similarity between the units I'm controlling everything is just a messy blur. For some this seems fresh and interesting and they will enjoy the constant action but it's just not my style of "Strategy" , for me I like something more deep.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: September 3, 2021
lotig
游戏: 11 评论: 1
Excellent and unique rts
This is still my favorite RTS since it came out back in 2007. Holds up extremely well. Single player is solid with high production value. Multiplayer is very fun and still functional because of fan support. Go to massgate.org to get it running. Can still find multiplayer matches in 2021 as well as games against bots.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: November 9, 2021
NuclearKangaroo
验证所有者游戏: 146 评论: 5
best story ive seen in an RTS
first things first, you are getting this for the single player, its a good thing its a good one, this is an RTS that is very easy to pick up and play, no resource gathering, its all about the tactics with an obvious focus on modern mobile warfare the single player is very varied and it has one great story to tell with very memorable characters, it is also a real nostalgia trip for anybody who lived through the late 80s/early 90s
这对您有帮助吗？
出错，请尝试刷新页面。
没有与您的要求相匹配的评论
Error loading patrons. Please refresh the page and try again.
