© 2020 Paradox Interactive AB, SURVIVING THE AFTERMATH, and PARADOX INTERACTIVE are trademarks and/or registered trademarks of Paradox Interactive AB in Europe, the U.S., and other countries. Developed by ICEFLAKE STUDIOS. All other trademarks, logos, and copyrights are property of their respective owners.
在游玩 Paradox Interactive AB 发布的游戏时，您 (i) 同意受到用户协议的约束，并且 (ii) 确认您已阅读并理解隐私政策。
Paradox 用户协议
https://legal.paradoxplaza.com/eula?locale=zh
Paradox 隐私政策
https://legal.paradoxplaza.com/privacy?locale=zh
在游玩 Paradox Interactive AB 发布的游戏时，您 (i) 同意受到用户协议的约束，并且 (ii) 确认您已阅读并理解隐私政策。
Paradox 用户协议
https://legal.paradoxplaza.com/eula?locale=zh
Paradox 隐私政策
https://legal.paradoxplaza.com/privacy?locale=zh
Game length provided by HowLongToBeat
Posted on: March 22, 2023
mistycoven
验证所有者游戏: 评论: 3
Not cool
Before I have even made it into the main menu, no less than three executable files are trying to phone home - the Paradox launcher, the game executable, and Unity. Why does a DRM-free title need three separate applications connecting to the Internet? And why doesn't the store page mention any of this before you purchase the game?
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: September 28, 2024
Zanstel
验证所有者游戏: 166 评论: 2
Mixed feelings
As a lover of the post-apocaliptic theme (from Fallout series) plus building games, like Surviving Mars, with a lot of similar mechanics, I should love this game. But... While I enjoy it, I see significant lacks in the game. First, the wiki lacks the quality of Surviving Mars by far. The embedded Tutorial doesn't explain a lot of things it should. The balancing is too rigid without good configurations that add versatility to the play (like the sponsors, and rules in surviving mars). As I saw in Internet, the game had a lot of changes since the release, and to make it longer, they make a lot of resources bottlenecks that risks to make it tedious and boring because ensure the development depends of too many variables and the non-bottleneck sources are limited which turns into a slow play. And in worse place, they explain NOTHING about how to mod the game. Just "install Unity version xxx and you have here an example". That's all. As expected, that turned into a number of mods ridiculous small, compared with thousands for Surviving Mars. Maybe the engine is not lacking (I know that Unity has a lot of things, but that doesn't ensure modding integration). But even if the engine has the potencial, you can do nothing if you lack documentation. This game with a great modding capabilities could fix all this problems and suits a lot more tastes than the original vanilla play. And extend a lot about the lore, that has a lot potential for people imagination, adding post-game new mechanisms. But... It's what it is. After some years after Paradox declare the game ended, I don't have hope they fix that and turned into a great game. And it's a pitty. These game with the moddability of Surviving Mars would turn really wonderful. Well... At least I can say that the music tracks of the default radio are superb. I really like them a lot.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: May 30, 2024
MethusalemOrion
验证所有者游戏: 478 评论: 25
In Sale Only
The game is pretty similar to "Endzone" but with older graphics. I also had 3 crashes in a row, but I think this is due a special quests since after finishing the sidequest I never had any issues again. I hate games with their own special launcher which makes everything annoying but there are instructions online how to get rid of the paradox launcher (it was pretty easy to do). About the game: as said before, this looks like a clone of Endzone (or vice versa). The buildings are nearly the same, the production line too etc. I think the only real difference is the world map and the specialists. The specialists are kind of super units which can build/collect and fight faster. You also use them on the world map to discover new territories. I liked that aspect. Was pretty nice (reminds me on civilization - hexagon map etc.). The difficultiy is quite good. But since I played this type of game before, I knew what to do. But I bet newcomers will die quite often. I only did the main campaign. I liked the idea that you need to discover your local map too and clean up all the waste and destroy the nests of the insects. Especially since you had first to research all this and this took quite some time. So you had to deal with the enemies in parallel to the catasrophes which occured here and there. There were moments where I wanted to give up ... but in the end ... this is the purpose of such a survival game, right? Just continue and try to find a solution. So I did and it worked. I give this 4/5. I read other reviews comparing it to "Banished" ... yes, I played Banished too. But I think these both games are quite different. It's like comparing Civilization and Cities:Skylines/SimCity. They are similar but still different. My ranking here is: 1. Endzone 2. Frostpunk 3. Surviving Mars 4. Surviving the Aftermath
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: November 9, 2024
WangChangZhang
验证所有者游戏: 评论: 1
Servicable, but certainly not great
Can't give 2,5 stars here... Coming from "Surviving Mars", this game here obviously had a much smaller team/budget/shorter development time. It does scratch the colony builder itch, but it does so far from its full potential. Everything from the UI, the mechanics (frequent "injury" and "radiation" cascades just to throw in some articial difficulty) to the tutorial/"help" menue (many things are simply not explained) is simply undercooked. Instead of taking time and budget to add some essential quality-of-life features (minimap; building grid view toggle; building keyboard shortcuts etc.) the developer pushed out 3 DLCs that focus on one gimmick each and are badly balanced with the main game. I did spend about 50 hrs with it (one playthrough on normal), but unlike "Surviving Mars" there's little here that will drag me to a 2nd playthrough.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: June 13, 2025
damianfett_8027
游戏: 5 评论: 1
Good game but
I think is a decent game but a little repetitive
这对您有帮助吗？
出错，请尝试刷新页面。
没有与您的要求相匹配的评论
Error loading patrons. Please refresh the page and try again.
