TM, ®, & © 2000 Paramount Pictures. All rights reserved. Star Trek, Star Trek Voyager and related marks are trademarks of Paramount Pictures. This product contains software technology licensed from Id Software, Inc. Id Technology ©1999, 2000 Id Softare, Inc. All rights reserved. Activision is a registered trademark of Activision, Inc. ©2000 Activision, Inc. The ratings icon is a trademark of the Interactive Digital Software Association. All other trademarks and trade names are the properties of their respective owners. © 2021 CBS Studios Inc. STAR TREK and related marks and logos are trademarks of CBS Studios Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Please Note: Multiplayer is available only via TCP/IP LAN.
Please Note: Multiplayer is available only via TCP/IP LAN.
Posted on: September 9, 2021
IceReaper
游戏: 314 评论: 1
Awesome and often overlooked gem!
I can recommend this game to not only Star Trek fans. It still plays and feels fantastic. It is basically the same engine as Quake3 or Jedi Outcast / Jedi Academy and also feels like them from a particular perspective. My literally only (personal) downside is, that the source code of this game never got released in opposite to the Jedi games or the base Quake 3 game :/
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: September 11, 2021
JOSHItheDrako
游戏: 666 评论: 2
Much better than the PS2 version.
If you played the game on PS2 like I did and hated it, give this version a shot. Controlls are smoother with mouse and keyboard and the game doesn't suffer from the attrocious loading times it had on the PS2! It can still be somewhat confusing at times about where to go or what to do, but it's well worth the effort to reach the later levels!
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: September 13, 2021
Th4rduz
验证所有者游戏: 274 评论: 2
One of the best
Thank you for bringing back this old gem, works perfectly on a new pc :D
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: October 14, 2021
briandoodo
验证所有者游戏: 236 评论: 38
Impressed by this old title
Of course the game is fairly old now. So, you can't expect the most realistic looking product. However, the map design in this game is quite impressive. I really enjoyed going to different locations that were brilliantly designed. For an older game, the map design was ahead of it' s time. I think it uses GTKRADIANT.... I've played other GTKRadiant games, Jedi Knight Academy, Outcast and Wolfenstein... This game was better designed than I think all of them. Which made it seem to age better. Whoever designed these maps (levels) props to you, very creative/ brilliant use of radiant for the time... It's rather short but it's pacing is pretty much nonstop. You do have very brief sequences where you get to sit in on briefings but... I wanted more exploration time but it's an older game and so I accept that it didn't have lots of extra content or exploration. (It tells a story and is limited to the size it can be...) You get to explore the ship but many doors are locked and there are no real holodeck programs to enjoy. I had to take breaks because of the pacing... but that meant I could enjoy it over a weeks time. The characters on your team can walk kind of slow, it's aggetitating to sometimes wait for them... Surprisingly you start to care about your team over time. There isn't alot of character development but it's an older game and probably couldn't be that scale when it first came out. The story is decent and it's a real pleasure to play a game voiced by the cast if you're a voyager fan. The character models aren't the greatest but once again this is an old title. Towards the end I was able to look past that and just enjoy the story... The combat is fun, the game is an enjoyable pass time, it's fun to shoot things. Because it's moddable and has a a community , it is more replayable, in theory you could play forever but sadly I can't find a lot of costum content for it. If you like playing older but special shooters I'd recommend.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: January 23, 2022
lowellbrit
验证所有者游戏: 815 评论: 2
OpenGL Issue workaround
In you take off full screen mode the issue seems to go away.
这对您有帮助吗？
出错，请尝试刷新页面。
没有与您的要求相匹配的评论
Error loading patrons. Please refresh the page and try again.
