© and TM Rebellion. All Rights Reserved.
Notice: German language support is only available for Lords of the Realm (CD Version) and Lords of the Realm II.
ATI/AMD compatibility notice: Lords of the Realm: Royal Edition requires graphic card drivers version 13.4 or older.
Multiplayer notice: The game's multiplayer servers have been taken offline, however, multiplayer over LAN is still available.
Please be advised that Windows 10 operating system will receive frequent hardware driver and software updates following its release; this may affect game compatibility.
Mac notice: The game is 32-bit only and will not work on macOS 10.15 and up.
Notice: German language support is only available for Lords of the Realm (CD Version) and Lords of the Realm II.
ATI/AMD compatibility notice: Lords of the Realm: Royal Edition requires graphic card drivers version 13.4 or older.
Multiplayer notice: The game's multiplayer servers have been taken offline, however, multiplayer over LAN is still available.
Please be advised that Windows 10 operating system will receive frequent hardware driver and software updates following its release; this may affect game compatibility.
Mac notice: The game is 32-bit only and will not work on macOS 10.15 and up.
Posted on: June 20, 2013
SirRealSC
验证所有者游戏: 365 评论: 1
Great Strategy game!
I played the SNOT out of this game in college. Heck, my roommates and I fought over who'd get the computer to play this. One friend macro-managed everything and another micro-managed each individual person to set up the perfect position. built huge castles and dared large armies to attempt to overthrow them. This is one of those games you will keep picking up and playing year after year
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: July 2, 2013
Shnuffle
验证所有者游戏: 214 评论: 3
Great game, but beware micromanagement
This game is great—fantastic combination of tactics and logistics. Balancing production, happiness, and military is difficult and rewarding. Only problem is the micromanagement. When growing wheat, you have to make small adjustments to the number of people growing grain in each territory in each turn, or else you get wasted labour or an insufficient harvest. Why not just have a button that allows you to do the minimum required work to harvest the entire crop? It'd save so much time.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: August 1, 2015
rdominici
验证所有者游戏: 266 评论: 1
Great game
Old but great. Simple and addictive. Played too many hours and repeated those maps. Now i am ready to repeat it all again.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: April 29, 2022
USER8569
验证所有者游戏: 63 评论: 2
Painfully Slow To Play
I've given this game a good go and do actually enjoy it but progress even three maps into the campaign just becomes painfully slow. As others have pointed out the Ai is a bit overpowered to say the least and the game is in no way forgiving on the player. As such the only consistent stratergy to win seems to be to turtle down defend what you have and slowly grind the Ai down through attrition to its economy. The only problem is this will take you 5 or 6 hours even by the third campaign map. There is some fun to be had on some of the skirmish maps once in a while, and the fundermentals of the gameplay are fun but unfortuantly play out in a way that makes the game horrifically slow to play on the campaign especially.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: May 24, 2010
HauntedQuiche
验证所有者游戏: 253 评论: 2
Let slip the cows of war
Cows are central to my war effort. Swords and soldiers, weapons and warriors? They matter as well. I mean, they certainly have their place in the grand scheme of things, but cows are the real backbone. My war-drums are the thunder of a thousand bovine hooves. Because Lords of the Realm 2 is a game of economic balancing masquerading as a game of military warfare. Battles are won with strong armies, but armies don't feed themselves and troops don't grow in vats. The same population that provides your soldiers also makes your blacksmiths and your farmers. If everybody is drafted into your army, who will feed and arm them? On the flip side, if everybody is busy tending turnips then who goes off to war? It's this balancing act which lies at the base of every decision. It's very easy to misjudge things – you send half the town away to war, knowing it'll be an easy win, and six months later they are still sieging the castle while the harvest rots in the field. Should you have sent less people? Would a smaller army have had a chance at capturing that county? Like I say, it's a constant economic balancing act. As for the rest of the game, it holds up well. The battles are fun and the characters nicely defined – you can recognise the difference between, say, the treacherous Countess or the brash Knight. The controls haven't aged very well and some of the difficulty options are quite well hidden, but there’s an easy charm to the game that transcends its creaking bones. So give 1996 another chance, but remember - the sickle is mightier than the sword.
这对您有帮助吗？
出错，请尝试刷新页面。
没有与您的要求相匹配的评论
Error loading patrons. Please refresh the page and try again.
