Cross-platform multiplayer is supported.
Battlefleet Gothic: Armada. Copyright © Games Workshop Limited 2016. Battlefleet Gothic: Armada, the Battlefleet Gothic: Armada logo, Battlefleet Gothic, the Battlefleet Gothic logo, GW, Games Workshop, Space Marine, 40K, Warhammer, Warhammer 40,000, 40,000, the 'Aquila' Double-headed Eagle logo, and all associated logos, illustrations, images, names, creatures, races, vehicles, locations, weapons, characters, and the distinctive likeness thereof, are either ® or TM, and/or © Games Workshop Limited, variably registered around the world, and used under licence. All rights reserved to their respective owners. Battlefleet Gothic: Armada is developed by Tindalos Interactive and published by Focus Home Interactive. All logos, trademarks or registered trademarks belong to their respective owners. All rights reserved.
Please note: GOG GALAXY is required to access online features.
Cross-platform multiplayer is supported.
Please note: GOG GALAXY is required to access online features.
Cross-platform multiplayer is supported.
Game length provided by HowLongToBeat
Posted on: October 9, 2024
john1566
验证所有者游戏: 154 评论: 11
Simple and fun 40k Space RTS
I actually enjoy this one more than the sequel, though I only play the single player campaign. This game is very approachable for more casual RTS fans. The graphics still look great in 2024. The story, sounds and voice acting are all great and creative an immersive experience. Question: in the grim darkness of the far future, why are all torpedos dumb??
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: November 17, 2024
Polemarchos
验证所有者游戏: 1151 评论: 1
Tactical Space battles at their best
Story, feel, looks and immersion are all great here. Little redundance here and there but in total one my favorite space tactical games
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: December 25, 2024
ArcaniteM
验证所有者游戏: 90 评论: 22
Quite good story
The second one is far supperior. But if you want the story of this game, it is good, get this one as well.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: June 2, 2022
manio22
验证所有者游戏: 240 评论: 9
Plays like a charm
Plays fine and the missions are very interesting. Love the graphics and the sounds, specially the voices.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: January 27, 2024
LoFi Enchilada
验证所有者游戏: 69 评论: 15
Be prepared to... enjoy it!?
The game runs butter-smooth, even on my hardware from 2011-2016, which I'm using to play this @4K with everything on ultra. Regarding the gameplay, it's an adaptation of the minis tabletop game. People giving 1-star reviews because they assumed this was going to be Homeworld with a W40K skin should've at least read the product description before buying, let alone watching gameplay/reviews. Also, yes, the gameplay looks EXACTLY like the screenshots... you just need to use the middle mouse button to zoom in and pan the camera around. Now, the game is an RTS in a 2D plane in which you control a small fleet of ships in short, to medium-length battles. The strategy relies on optimal positioning and knowledge of each ship's weapons and skills, as well as split-second decisions regarding the ship's movement and operation. You get to upgrade the commanders of these ships and the ships themselves, and the campaign, while it won't change your life, it's super enjoyable. That being said, it's a game from Tindalos Interactive, which shows primarily on the sound quality. The voice acting and UI is good, the jankyness of its AA developer's DNA leaks into the quality. For example, voice tracks are awfully compressed both in file size, and in mastering. It sounds like they used a landline telephone to record the voices and SFX, and then used a compressor to flatten the volume differences. The sound as a whole is noisy but lacks punch, and it's almost devoid of bass or depth. In short, if you saw gameplay and thought it looked cool or fun, you should definitely get this game and the sequel as both are enjoyable spectacles. You can safely skip the DLC on this one since it's just two campaign-less factions that only work on skirmish and multiplayer modes.
这对您有帮助吗？
出错，请尝试刷新页面。
没有与您的要求相匹配的评论
Error loading patrons. Please refresh the page and try again.
