Since reviews for cyberpunk seem to be plagued by the type of person of :" I thought this was going to be the best game ever but it wasn't and now I have to vent my frustration but hide that fact" I thought I should add my review. The review of someone who did not have any expectations other than this being the next game from CDPR. And you can see that it is a CDPR game. With one difference: it's less buggy. I know quite the shocker right? I am ofc talking solely about the PC release and not the old gen console release. I played this game on release date. I played almost 90hrs of it, without a single game breaking bug and maybe one crash. Now compare this to my recently started fresh playthrough of Witcher 3 GOTY edition. Within 18 hrs I had 3 freezes/crashes and several quest softlocks (I had to reload to continue). That game has been out for 7 years already and has had more than enough patches and is still way more buggy than CP. So why is it then, that everyone loves Witcher 3 but hates CP? Quite simple really. No one expected anything from CDPR before Witcher 3. Expectations skyrocketed after the success of Witcher 3. Additionally the setting of Witcher is way more intriguing in general compared to that of CP. Nowadays we are almost LIVING CP. CP is not some fantasy it is pretty much reality, besides the whole cybernetics and sci-fi stuff ofc. The setting and stories you can create are all too familiar und you can immediately tell where they are going. The Witcher however is foreign to everyone, thus the stories are more unexpected and more intriguing. So since all of you probably played Witcher 3: the gameplay is very similar tbh. Just with guns. You tick boxes on a big map (remember the question marks? yea they are in here too) and you do side quests. All in all it is pretty much Witcher 3 with a different setting, worse story and more stable.