How do you review a “game in development”? I’ve played this one for a while now, going through at least a half-dozen updates. In the more recent updates, the amount of content, stability, number of bugs, and play balance issues have all improved a great deal. As a fan of Master of Orion 2, I recognize the familiar races and technologies. I am impressed by the stunning graphics in all of the modes, from the galactic map to the planetary view and especially the tactical fleet combat. I generally run the game on “Ultra” graphic settings, but still manage to get a couple of hours out of my laptop before having to plug in. Since I was a fan of MOO2, I initially had some trouble getting used to the way that interstellar travel is handled in this edition. However, once over that hurdle, I found that it added an additional element of strategy. Both diplomacy and espionage have a level of depth that are impressive in light of how simple the interface and controls are. There are also some previously unfamiliar technologies that appear in this game that make for some interesting options and strategies when making your way through the galaxy and staking out your territory. I have already recommended this game to my friends and family that were fans of other Master of Orion games. It does have a few remaining bugs and play balance issues, but I fully expect those to be squashed in fairly short order. I’ll update my review and maybe even give it the final star - if I can - when it is released if it meets my expectations.
