The usual decisions Does the game work? Does it have a deep history? Does it deliver what it promises or amuse it? To all that... Let's look at it this way: If you played Fallout 3, do you want to play it again with all the good and bad it has or a copy that clashes after playing it? It depends on anyone. That is to say, what to expect from "Bugthesda Crashworks"? It is too similar to the third: some polished game mechanics along with other small additions that leave it lazy and monotonous (like a new installment. Like Spin-Off, not so much), new and well-known factions, an environment (map) that is a little varied but not so gloomy, convoluted and variable story well Fallout, passable secondary missions (The DLCs are worth it), optimized for “cheap weight”, dubious difficulty (BEWARE of the tricksters), very good soundtrack (Inon Zur does not disappoint) and sound, A.I. funny, strange physics, dubbing errors and Spanish text, etc. "It neither pricks nor cuts" For me, If this had been one or more Fallout 3 DLCs, I would have loved it. It wasn't quite like that. What's more, if I played this one first, I would have disliked the third game. Who is interested in long, irritating, free-choice, "post-apocalyptic atomic punk western" types of games that combine survival, role-playing and pvp, Let's say it's worth it in a juicy offer (get it with the saga package).
