checkmarkchevron-down linuxmacwindows ribbon-lvl-1 ribbon-lvl-1 ribbon-lvl-2 ribbon-lvl-2 ribbon-lvl-3 ribbon-lvl-3 sliders users-plus
Send a message
Invite to friendsFriend invite pending...
This user has reviewed 2 games. Awesome!
Iron Harvest

Not a fun game

Bought this early on GOG, hoping it would be good, but it's just hard to play: - The light infantry can't travel through thick woods and attack from well-covered terrain so they're almost useless. Light infantry with anti-tank weapons are deadly in tight terrain, and tanks will avoid them in real life - Balance is crazy difficult in the campaign, even under the easiest setting - Unit caps and production limits mean that the Poles are always overwhelmed by infinite hords of Russians attacking, and it's a complete grind to try to keep up as your units are slaughtered by perpetual waves of Russians - Unit movement is spongy and unresponsive; units will not seek cover or maintain cover while fighting - - so they just die - I wanted this to be a steampunk version of Supreme Commander, but instead it's just a grind house of trying to generate troop after troop while your forces are constantly killed off

20 gamers found this review helpful
GWENT: The Witcher Card Game

Ok, but Witcher III version is better

Have been playing off and on from the beta version to now, the changes in Gwent have made it much more complex and dynamic - but honestly deck-building is a mess and now there are just too many cards. Between "engine cards", "thinning cards" etc there is too much going on now. As a result every game I get trashed - which isn't fun... CDProjeckt - please help 1. Make deck-building simpler, not more complicated 2. Maybe fewer cards, with stronger plays and more animation instead of entirely new factions? 3. Witcher III 3 row approach seems to have more depth - maybe that's just a whole different game than this?

2 gamers found this review helpful