"It is literally a groomer type "MAPs are okay" game." - Please, show me, one refernce in game where an adult is having a sexually-themed conversation with an underaged kid. - Show me one "MAP" adult that we feel positive toward to, while knowing he's a Minor Atracted Person. "It is made to apeal to groomers and children." - No, MAP is a Minor Attracted Person, an adult that is attracted to a minor, the title shows no such images, it shows you a child that may be atracted to another child in a more or less childish way. You do not play as an adult in game, and a MAP person would not find out this game interesting in pedophile way, as you imagine it. "It is simply a gay digital version of the movie "Cuties". " - No, the movie "Cuties" was mixing a show-busines, almost porn industry with an underaged children, this title is showing a very normal topics, that some people might have missed, because they were rised by parents like you. " Anyone who gave this game 5 stars needs to stay away from children." - Anyone who gave this game 5 stars, was looking for things they have missed, due to living with a parent like you, some bounds or connections they have missed, because their drunk catholic daddy beat them for not being heterosexual, so it's more like feeding nostalgia and missed chances, than what your miniscule mind created. ". Anyone with this game in their library should be investigated by law enforcement." - Anyone with this title in the library, should be more happy, as they lost something and look in this title as a nostalgia. You need to learn how to drive a car and do some test to pass, to simply drive a car, but to make another human being, you just need some alcohol and people like you to make it, and everyone is happy... resulting in simple beings like you, stating there opinions. :) prove more wrong, debate? PS. I am not gonna defend any pedophile, but you're making an accusations toward me as well, so I'm gonna talk back.
