Having played the for countless times I can say that this remake is worth it. While it does not change any of the gameplay (which is good) it does add the countless amount of features. All expansions + countless graphical settings and new gameplay settings that were not there before. Also, it is very easy to host a multiplayer game and join one. There appeared to be no lag at all when I hosted a game which is great! Suggestion to the devs: Please take a look at BloodGDX mod for the original blood and see the Multiplayer settings. There is a way to help up a fallen teammate which made it Incredibly fun and made the game feel very dated with a feature like that. There is also a way to change the friendly fire damage % from 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 or full. Other than that it is an excellent remake that I am happy to support.
I won´t trash the game rating by giving it 3 or whatever just because i can´t play it.. However I tryed to play it a bit and It´s way too hard for my mind i think and it requires alot of time which nobody haves... I don´t mind that the graphicks are crappy ( well its 1986 ) So yeah .. I am not a cod fanboy to lololo shity graphicks and so on ... however If i get time i try to look into it once more and make the commands clear on paper .. so i know what to press :D
I rate that game with 5 stars just because i love blood 1 and the blood 2 is not bad at all BUT Blood 2 well it has some flaws i think ( im not much of mistake finder hehe so i dont give a fuck if some model glitches sometimes or something like that ) Anyways...Its not good as Blood (one unit whole blood) because B1 is just awesome and the graphicks are better in some angle haha and well its just excellent game with alot of graveryard style creepy stuff .. cultist screaming ( one of my favorite things ) then creepy ass zombies . good atmosphiere and very very good soundtracks ! BUT Blood 2 is very good as shooter its kinda intresting id say and the game is not short at all comparing to new games.. if you see one weird person sayingh here that b2 is 1/5 star game then he can F Off u know just F off and i dont care .. because blood 2 is worst than blood 1 because Blood 2 is EARLY 3D AGE .. think about that for second .. instead of 2D sprites theres 3D graphicks and stuff .. and the game is made in 1998 so its very amazing graphicks in that time... SO THINK BEFORE RATING IT with 1/5
The game is actually not just FPS its like . you can´t really describe it .. but that game my friends That fucking game beats any damn game ever made so far! theres alot of games that are good but.. Blood , Blood is just something so good i must say.. it does not have good graphick setup ( but the graphicks are more than awesome imo) the game has veeery much humour and cool things in it and its just so epic.. i know it :D played it for 10 years ( grew up with it and finished the game like 1 year ago with all expansions... worth every sent you will pay for it..
