It is okay, but overrated. I guess a lot of people discovered crpgs the first time, so they don't know about better games. The story here in particular moves really slowly, there is a lot of dialogue but little substance to most of it.
I knew it would be bad but boy is it BAD. At least the game provides a good argument for universal basic income: Half the society could stop doing their jobs and nothing of value would be lost. Why? Because half of them are producing unnecessary junk such as this game.
It is okay, but the strange combat of this game just isn't very fun against an input reading AI. If it was turn based it might work, but as it is, it is pretty bad. Of course turn based would mean proper AI development and not just input reading so yeah that's why it isn't there.
It must have taken some kind of genius or crazy to come up with this creation. Scifi games of this type do not really exist. If ECHO was a movie, it would be closer to Solaris than Star Wars.
It's an art game with interesting atmosphere and good & animation.
A shooter with a bit of physics twist. Not much to say.
It's fun, maybe a little short but otherwise good. I had a lot of fun playing through it.
The game is filled with so many bugs and bad design decisions that it is impossible to give it a good rating. It is clear that Owlcat is decades behind studios such as Bioware, Obsidian or Larian. The only reason why the game is salvageable is because the Pathfinder rules give the game somewhat decent core. However, large amount of interesting Pathfinder features are missing or simply bugged. I have no doubt that professional studios could have implemented the Pathfinder setup much better than Owlcat did. I can carefully recommend the game to die hard fans who are desperate for new crpgs. But everyone else would be wise to stay far away.
