Why can't casual gamers review games? Because they don't know what's important. All these people bit**ing about this game have no idea how hard it is to create such a MASSIVE and full of activities world. Is Cyberpunk 2077 bugged? Yes. Could it be optimised better? Yes. Could the vehicles drive better? YES. But, is it an RPG/FPS or a racing game? A game can't be perfect in every way, it's simply not possible. It wasn't the case with The Witcher 3, and most certainly isn't for Cyberpunk. Yet somehow, despite W3 not being perfect, people all over the world announced it the best RPG ever. Why? Because of the story, that's what matters the most in an RPG, right next to character development. These 2 very important aspects are OUTSTANDING in Cyberpunk. And that's why I recommend this game to people who liked The Witcher 3. Bugs will go away and it will be even more amazing than it is now. Sure, you may call me a fanboy or whatever, but at least I'm not giving 1/10 or 2/10 to a game that objectively deserves at least an 8/10. That kind of behavior is just really, really immature. For me personally, it will be 10/10 once they remove the bugs. (PS. I would rate it 4 stars for now and change it to 5 when they fix the bugs, but I wanna even out the 1/5 and 2/5 reviews)
