Game length provided by HowLongToBeat
Posted on: October 13, 2017
Vargathon
Владелец игрыИгр: 209 Отзывов: 7
Bugs which don't get fixed
Me, as like many others on forums am having scaling issues with the game making it 100% unplayable. Mouse offset is so huge it's impossible to change any settings to even lower the scaling (which appears to be the problem). Extremely poorly made because this has been reported often and devs don't care.
вам это показалось полезным?
Posted on: September 2, 2018
Lookda
Владелец игрыИгр: 414 Отзывов: 53
Excellent tactical combat, poor campaign
The message that the devs would no longer work on BB left many in wonder: How good BB might have become? While not an easy message, I think they made the right decision. The game was not on a path to become great. It was better to start over and work on a title where (hopefully) all elements work together. So why? The first demo of BB contained a few single battle scenarios. These were excellent with beautiful head-figures, tension, last man stands, general routs and meaningful weapon and armor choices. All was in the demo, before they made the campaign, a sandbox to create continuity between battles. Most problems of the campaign can be fixed with additional content and minor changes. Examples are meaningless walking in an empty world, text-based events with a mere yes/no option that can leave your best archer with one eye, and a tedious grind for gold. However, the biggest problem is that tactical battles simply don’t work with a campaign. An overconfidently picked 3-skull contract puts you in a fun and tense battle, and with many useless and dead men. It takes half a day (real world time) of 1-skull contracts and boring pushover battles to make up for some of the losses. The devs call this, in one of the tips: Losing is fun! The battle was fun, yes, but the recovery afterwards feels more like a campaign reset. The risk of some contracts is not worth it, is another tip. I’m running from fights that might be won, but likely at severe cost. Where is the fun in that? I hope that the devs stopped investing in BB for this reason, only. Focus on their next game to make it more than the sum of its parts. BB’s demo was a straight 4.5 out of 5 for me. Unfortunately, the campaign brings it down to a lousy 3 stars :(. Imaging how BB would be if, instead of a campaign, they made 100 very unique scenarios? Various setups, troop compositions, equipment layouts, battles focusing on mechanics such as morale, aiming for the head, shield walls, etc. That would have been great!
вам это показалось полезным?
Posted on: June 18, 2021
FallenHeroX1
Владелец игрыИгр: Отзывов: 85
Flawed but maybe worth your time.
Battle Brothers is a fun strategy game where your men dying is as common as using the restroom or checking social media. It perfectly captures the quick brutality of death in combat and cleverly uses many different systems to simulate close quarters battle. The art design while offputting at first in screenshots, quickly grew on me. The music is absolutely wonderful, this is the kind of stuff you might find yourself wanting to listen to in your freetime. So why is the game 3 stars instead of 5? Well it's simple really. The game is very opaque in design. There are things going on behind the scenes that the devs didn't feel was neccessary to explain. For example, why does some armor drop by not others. There is a reason for this but the game sure didn't care to ever let me know. It was only with using outside sources and looking at youtube guides that I became fully aware of how much the game was hiding from me. There is something to be said for discovery and exploration in video games. Hand holding has become a major complaint over recent years, so I can certainly see the appeal of something that literally doesn't tell you the rules, but there is also something to be said about brick wall design that can only be over come by repeatedly banging your head for hundreds of hours or resorting to spoiling the discoveries anyway with hand holding online tutorials. For that, this game fails and succeeds. It succeeds at being a great game but fails at letting you actually play it. The challenge felt less like it was coming from managing resources or even battle, and more like it was coming from the developers who decided puzzles are most fun to put together while you blindfolded and sitting in the dark. Like Monopoly hiding the fact that you can buy property so you are forever rolling dice, I grew tired of spinning my wheels around the board. And what good is discovery if I need outside sources to learn what's going on anyway? It's okay to tell me the rules
вам это показалось полезным?
Posted on: August 6, 2017
someguys
Владелец игрыИгр: 169 Отзывов: 24
Already bugged
That's a problem with nowadays games: the're bugged. I've been playing for 15 minutes, I entered a town, left, and then tried to re-enter it, I can't, the game gets stuck on the map screen without displaying the town screen. Appart from that, the game feels extremely... cheap. All in all it's not the worst game here on GoG, but not the best either. I'd rather play M&B Warband.
вам это показалось полезным?
Posted on: May 3, 2023
idontmindreally
Владелец игрыИгр: 62 Отзывов: 1
Oof
I would avoid this game if you want a deep strategic squad base game. I got into battle brothers because I've played quite a few squad-based strategy games and looking at the game's systems it just seemed like a perfect game but turns out everything is dictated by a heavy-handed RNG system. First, you start a new game and the map will be randomly generated and the RNG can be heavy enough that the very seed you are in is unplayable. But lets assume it isn't then maybe the towns that have spawned in your seed might also make it unplayable, maybe your starting brothers are so bad that you would want a restart or maybe your seed has only bad brothers (for a time) and the occasional death-stack at the start of the game because some villagers got butchered by monsters and fed them. Maybe you roll poorly in fights and maybe it doesn't hit the body part you want, maybe you randomly get wounded or you roll dmg so low you end up not killing enemies in 2 hits but 5-6 hits, maybe you hit your own characters and maybe you don't drop anything. The core idea is that you are meant to mitigate some of the RNG but never all of it, which is a fine pillar to build a game off but you NEVER go this hard on the values. Also, the strategic elements of the game are too shallow (besides the terrain elements, like hill battlemaps or forest or just night-time for instance), say you want to go high ground to gain an advantage on your attacks, you will get up to 10% chance to hit, why even bother if a single hit can send you back to the main menu? The weapons are nice however, there's close to 20 different types which are distinct and matter a lot on how you approach combat, however it is a tier system, tier 2 is better in every way and tier 1 is now obsolete kind of jam. If you don't mind the graphics, a simple strategy system, very little music and general soundscape, if dont mind the story being very light and if you don't mind save scumming this is a fine game albeit not spectacular.
вам это показалось полезным?
Что-то пошло не так. Попробуйте обновить страницу.
Отзывов по данным критериям не существует
Error loading patrons. Please refresh the page and try again.
