It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Hello all,

I am looking to start Witcher 3. I beat Witcher 1 and Witcher 2 (both Iorveth and Roche's path) awhile back and cant recall all the choices I made in the prior games. So I was thinking of simulating a Witcher 2 save using console commands instead.

According to the w2import.csv file these are all the choices that carry over from Witcher 2:

import_iorweth_path
import_council_exists
import_geralt_rescued_triss
import_letho_alive
import_radowid_has_anais
import_arjan_dead // (arjan = Aryan La Valette)
import_sheala_alive
import_henselt_alive
import_odrin_met
import_geralt_has_tattoo
import_geralt_drank_mysterious_potion

I know we can simulate some of those choices by answering the questions in Vizima except for the following-
Henselt being alive or not, meeting Odrin, drinking the potion and having the tattoo. For those choices I was going to set them via command line using addfact() and removefact().

My question though are there any other additional choices that carry over from Witcher 2 that are not listed in the csv file?
Do any of the choices in Witcher 1 carry over?

Lastly, does it matter if you choose to give Anais to Radovid or Natalis in Witcher 2?
It appears that Witcher 3 treats that choice as if you gave her to Radovid regardless if you chose to give her to Natalis. Evident by the "import_radowid_has_anais" item in the csv file.

Thanks.
This question / problem has been solved by Hickoryimage
When I say "irrelevant" it means it makes no difference in W3 or is never mentioned.
avatar
WarriorOfTheNight: import_iorweth_path
Irrelevant.

import_council_exists
Irrelevant.

import_geralt_rescued_triss
Irrelevant.

import_letho_alive
Imported (relevant).

import_radowid_has_anais
Irrelevant.

import_arjan_dead // (arjan = Aryan La Valette)
Only relevant in minor passing comment.

import_sheala_alive
Sile in English. Only relevant in minor dungeon scene.

import_henselt_alive
Irrelevant.

import_odrin_met
Irrelevant.

import_geralt_has_tattoo
Relevant. This can only be imported, not obtained through the questions.

import_geralt_drank_mysterious_potion
Only relevant in a very small, very easy to miss Easter egg (can't remember where).

My question though are there any other additional choices that carry over from Witcher 2 that are not listed in the csv file?
Not that I know of.

Do any of the choices in Witcher 1 carry over?
Apparently not, although, in Hearts of Stone and my encounter with Shani, she was quite clear that we (Geralt and her) had had a romantic relationship during our time in Vizima. A comment that she did not make when I imported a Triss romance save. That could have been missed by me, though. The official line is nothing carries over from TW1.

Lastly, does it matter if you choose to give Anais to Radovid or Natalis in Witcher 2?
It appears that Witcher 3 treats that choice as if you gave her to Radovid regardless if you chose to give her to Natalis. Evident by the "import_radowid_has_anais" item in the csv file.
Precisely so.
Post edited August 24, 2017 by Hickory
avatar
Hickory: When I say "irrelevant" it means it makes no difference in W3 or is never mentioned.
avatar
WarriorOfTheNight: import_iorweth_path
avatar
Hickory: Irrelevant.

import_council_exists
avatar
Hickory: Irrelevant.

import_geralt_rescued_triss
avatar
Hickory: Irrelevant.

import_letho_alive
avatar
Hickory: Imported (relevant).

import_radowid_has_anais
avatar
Hickory: Irrelevant.

import_arjan_dead // (arjan = Aryan La Valette)
avatar
Hickory: Only relevant in minor passing comment.

import_sheala_alive
avatar
Hickory: Sile in English. Only relevant in minor dungeon scene.

import_henselt_alive
avatar
Hickory: Irrelevant.

import_odrin_met
avatar
Hickory: Irrelevant.

import_geralt_has_tattoo
avatar
Hickory: Relevant. This can only be imported, not obtained through the questions.

import_geralt_drank_mysterious_potion
avatar
Hickory: Only relevant in a very small, very easy to miss Easter egg (can't remember where).

My question though are there any other additional choices that carry over from Witcher 2 that are not listed in the csv file?
avatar
Hickory: Not that I know of.

Do any of the choices in Witcher 1 carry over?
avatar
Hickory: Apparently not, although, in Hearts of Stone and my encounter with Shani, she was quite clear that we (Geralt and her) had had a romantic relationship during our time in Vizima. A comment that she did not make when I imported a Triss romance save. That could have been missed by me, though. The official line is nothing carries over from TW1.

Lastly, does it matter if you choose to give Anais to Radovid or Natalis in Witcher 2?
It appears that Witcher 3 treats that choice as if you gave her to Radovid regardless if you chose to give her to Natalis. Evident by the "import_radowid_has_anais" item in the csv file.
avatar
Hickory: Precisely so.
Thanks for the Reply. its sad to see that your choices from the past games have little impact on Witcher 3. Especially Iorveth's path. From what I recall defending Vergen from Henselt's army was one of the most epic moments in the Witcher saga for me.

I heard that at most you just get some dialogue references from some Temarian fighters when you encounter them if you sided with Iorveth. Also, depending if you import Henselt is alive or dead all you get is references in conversation as well. Guess that is what you mean by being irrelevant.

I forgot to ask about Saskia. In the csv file their is a reference to Saskia being alive or not- setting import_saskia_alive. Does importing that choice have any relevance?

Thanks
avatar
WarriorOfTheNight: I forgot to ask about Saskia. In the csv file their is a reference to Saskia being alive or not- setting import_saskia_alive. Does importing that choice have any relevance?
The only mention of Saskia is a short dialog where Geralt asks Philippa Eilhart where she is and if she managed to break free of Philippa's spell. Her response is, "I lost control of her when the war broke out. I've no notion where she is."
Thanks Hickory for your help I started playing Witcher 3 and I am loving it so far.
One thing I wanted to ask about is that I heard that if you simulate a save rather then import a save the game treats you as a newcomer and hides parts of the lore from you. Is this true?
If so does it hide the lore pertaining to the choices that we discussed that are carried over form Witcher 2? Or is it backstory from the previous games that are hidden?

Thanks again!
avatar
WarriorOfTheNight: Thanks Hickory for your help I started playing Witcher 3 and I am loving it so far.
One thing I wanted to ask about is that I heard that if you simulate a save rather then import a save the game treats you as a newcomer and hides parts of the lore from you. Is this true?
If so does it hide the lore pertaining to the choices that we discussed that are carried over form Witcher 2? Or is it backstory from the previous games that are hidden?

Thanks again!
I don't know where you've heard that from, but it's nonsense. That would require making (in effect) two distinct versions of the game. Choices and consequences, simulated or not, are the same. Having said that, there are plenty of instances where a person who played (and presumably imported) prior games, as opposed to somebody playing 'clean slate', will *recognise* more of what is said, done, shown etc. There is the distinction. Nothing is hidden. Both type of players see exactly the same content, all other factors being equal.
avatar
WarriorOfTheNight: Thanks Hickory for your help I started playing Witcher 3 and I am loving it so far.
One thing I wanted to ask about is that I heard that if you simulate a save rather then import a save the game treats you as a newcomer and hides parts of the lore from you. Is this true?
If so does it hide the lore pertaining to the choices that we discussed that are carried over form Witcher 2? Or is it backstory from the previous games that are hidden?

Thanks again!
avatar
Hickory: I don't know where you've heard that from, but it's nonsense. That would require making (in effect) two distinct versions of the game. Choices and consequences, simulated or not, are the same. Having said that, there are plenty of instances where a person who played (and presumably imported) prior games, as opposed to somebody playing 'clean slate', will *recognise* more of what is said, done, shown etc. There is the distinction. Nothing is hidden. Both type of players see exactly the same content, all other factors being equal.
I read it on a Reddit post. The person claimed that they beat the game twice once using an imported save file and another time using the simulate feature. They stated that some of the lore was hidden in their simulated playthrough. I was skeptical myself but just wanted to confirm with others who played the game.